obvious WB told him to say this. they dont want negative articles about their actors.
Yeah, I can absolutely see WB hitting up Hardy's cell asking him to apologize for rattling a few posters on some message boards.
obvious WB told him to say this. they dont want negative articles about their actors.
Too bad this doesn't apply to half the actors that have played these roles. That is an argument easily refuted.the same like how actors from comicbook movies are always comicbook fans. they were the biggest fans when they were young. this is all made up for promotion. studio asks those actors to talk in interviews about thier passion for comicbooks
is this post for me? did you read what i wrotte? WB the studio doesnt want articles where they talk how Hardy doesnt take their movie serious. i never said that Hardy doesnt care.Just because Hardy likened a big-budget blockbuster film to Starbucks in no way suggests that he doesn't take his work in those types of films seriously. That is putting words in his mouth.
If you actually listen to what he says, his analogy actually isn't that far off. Like a blockbuster film, Starbucks is mainstream. It's a franchise. It's meant to cater to a wide demographic. Yet for some reason, people assume that this automatically means a mediocre product. I would, in no way, consider Starbucks "mediocre."
He wants to bring art to a type of film that, at large, is meant for mass-appeal entertainment. What exactly is the problem with that?
In layman's terms: you're wrong. I can name you plenty of actors who have admitted to not reading/liking comic books prior to receiving their roles.what?
That egg has not remotely hatched yet.I swear, some people can be so damn uptight. Hardy's not a die-hard comic-book fan, and likens blockbuster films to a popular coffee franchise. Seriously, who gives a ****? The man's one of the best actors of his generation. He's going to deliver the goods.
In layman's terms: you're wrong. I can name you plenty of actors who have admitted to not reading/liking comic books prior to receiving their roles.
Calling his body peak for Bronson is a bit of a stretch.
With the big coat on it doesnt make him look as big. It hides it.
tthe problem to WB is when articles are realesed that the actor from their franchise doesnt take the work serious. they want the public to think that every actor thinks this is the best movie.
the same like how actors from comicbook movies are always comicbook fans. they were the biggest fans when they were young. this is all made up for promotion. studio asks those actors to talk in interviews about thier passion for comicbooks

Well he looks bigger in Bronson and absolutely jacked in The Warrior.
The coat hiding his look is sort of my point. Smoke and Mirrors. Absence makes the heart grow fonder kind of thing.
When he does take of his coat off (maybe just before fighting Bats), and venoms up, its going to be terrific!
That egg has not remotely hatched yet.
One of the greatest actors of his time? Im not sure if im convinced of that just yet.
I don't think his filmography is strong enough to hold up against the heavyweights. He's had a few good supporting roles and a strong standout lead performance, but it takes a lot more to be up there with the big dogs.That may be the case for American audiences, who think of Tom as this new emerging talent who just hit it big with Inception. But for a lot of Brits, Tom Hardy has been tearing it up in British film and TV for the last decade or so, and has built up a reputation as one of our most reliably great actors. I wouldn't hesitate in calling him one of the best actors of his generation. And not just because he's playing Bane. In fact, a couple of years ago I was on these boards talking about how he was one of the very few actors of that generation capable of matching Heath Ledger if they were looking to recast The Joker.
Me either, though it probably says more about his competition than his acting skills themselves.
That being said, I doubt anybody not frequenting SHH really cares what Hardy thinks about TDKR. Regardless of how cool it might seem for us to partake in a film like this, I'm pretty sure there's a side of it that seems a bit silly no matter how much you love comics or who's at the helm.
His only job is to perform to the best of his abilities and deliver on Nolan's vision. As long as he does that, it won't matter what his personal thoughts are. It's not like Harrison Ford loved making Blade Runner
Harrison was working on a very different film with a much smaller budget (also, he made up with Ridley).
What people don't mention is the part of the article where Hardy says the challenge is bring character-work to this big-budget airport-like atmosphere. However, in another interview, Hardy said Nolan manages to make everything feel personal and more like an indie project. Hathaway said the same.