For half a friggin issue. Do your homework X fans. This was not Dark Angel Saga haha.
This was throw a hot girl in the movie to get us suckers into the film and make a horrible display of her powers. Caliban had more character.
oh come on! what has time to do with it? Which horsemen works a longer time for Apocalypse? Apocalypse is the dumbest villain in X-Men history. He normally shows up, transforms an X-Men and is defeated again. (very good adaptions in this movie for exactly that!)
the problem is not that Psylocke was an horsemen. The problem is that they did not used her at all!
What made the horsemen like Archangel stories awesome is that they had character development with the X-Men. It ****ed them up to see their friends like that. Here they are mute statues. Brings nothing to the table. Nothing.
Using the excuse that Betsy was a horseman for 1 comic in any fashion is bs. She was a horsemen for a reason in that one book and it had to do with a relationship that was built upon for quite sometime and had heavy ramifications.
I agree. But it is EXACTLY the same situation in the comic books! Archangel is the only horsemen who ever got an interesting story arc because of his horsemen status and lost of wings. Let's not pretend the comics are more interesting in this regard. Apocalypse is a horrible villain and the only good stories with him are Age of Apocalypse and The Dark Angel Saga. Every other story is utterly garbage and so are normally his horsemen!
Yeah he was definitely a better defined villian Then some are making him out to be. Another Ironic thing about his statement is his whole calling them children, when he's just using them for his own end.ApophènX;33730281 said:Apocalypse was a good vilain despite everything seems to see. he is connected to every characters.
He is opposite of Mystique in the role of leader figure, through Storm, and he always take his horsemens where she went.
Magneto often had a christic figure in the X-men and Apocalypse is that and more. Plus Erik just lost his "home", like Apocalypse who sees a world full of "false idols", machins and buildings. He wants to go back to nature and the center of the world. (This is why it is important Erik daughter's is connected to nature, he lost "nature", "home" and wants to get back to it, before super powers and civilizations, as civilizations is a result of the super power of human kind: creation)
Apocalypse incarnate that as well, he can model matter as he wants. He see himself as a god. But he lacks connections and the telepathic habilities wich goes along side with empathy (as Jean and Charles show to both have). He lacks connections, he is alone. Where Charles and his xmen are a family, a "home".
The word of the mouth is really good about this movie. Regular people don't read reviews.
The word of the mouth is really good about this movie. Regular people don't read reviews.
if thats the case why do alot of badly reviewed films flop? catwomen, fan4stic?
then again well recieved movies fail to like dredd and then there are the transformers movie that get bad reviews but break in so much money that it makes you wonder why and now!
And I think not everyone read the same reviews. After seeing the movie I posted on Facebook to ignore the bad reviews and just enjoy the movie and I my friends were surprised by my post, saying they have only read good reviews. I guess it depends where you get your reviews. Everything I've read in local newspaper indeed gave it a good score.
I'd say pretty much any horsemen in the comics is better then what this film gave us man.
Ichisunmi, Sunfire, Gambit, Polaris whatever. They had character prior or had stonrg motivation. This was all pretty much nothing with questionable motivation coming from a contrived script.
OW my range 70M-90M
Total WW my range 700M-900M
It was not as bad as Fantastic 4 in the slightest you are really reaching with that comment. By no means is it a flop or failure so your list is obsolete.Yeah they aren't gonna reboot. This isn't like Spider-Man or Fantastic Four. Fox would probably make smaller films with smaller budget and they still have Deadpool 2. Like if X-Men: Apocalypse only cost Fox $178 million to make then thats quite cheap (though IMO that is just part of their damage control and that the film cost more). Though Apocalypse is shaping up to be THE disappointment of Marvel films this year.
2014: The Amazing Spider-Man 2
2015: Fant4stic
2016: X-Men: Apocalypse
God, I pray to God that Wolverine 3 will be amazing and that it will be the greatest Wolverine film evah! Okay!
It was not as bad as Fantastic 4 in the slightest you are really reaching with that comment. By no means is it a flop or failure so your list is obsolete.