• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

BvS All Things Superman and Batman: An Open Discussion - - - - Part 73

Status
Not open for further replies.
^I got screwed cause people didn't get why I laughed. When Mrs. Kent explained it, and everybody saw they were wrong... nobody acknowledged it. :(
 
How am I hitting strawmen when it's you posting images of a burnt out hellscape and calling it Metropolis?

And after TWO FREAKIN' YEARS I think the center of Metropolis is not going to be a crater that ZOD INFLICTED on it.
 
Here's a game i'd like to play: Lets get through part 73 without mentioning:
Superman Returns
How Man of Steel Flopped
Batman was added to this movie because MOS underperformed
Superman destroying Metropolis
 
If the rumor is true and indeed some significant time has passed since the events of MOS, then I don't see a problem with showing Metropolis fully rebuilt.
 
Here's a game i'd like to play: Lets get through part 73 without mentioning:
Superman Returns
How Man of Steel Flopped
Batman was added to this movie because MOS underperformed
Superman destroying Metropolis

Why must you ask for the impossible?
 
I think it has a lot to do with the man inside the suit rather than the suit itself. Brandon Routh, who I'm sure is a nice guy, just lacks the Superman aura. His eyes give off a blank stare.

Henry Cavill has a certain aura that screams "Superman". His eyes can look innocent, sad, kind and world-weary all at the same time.

man-of-steel-23.jpg

I love that picture. Perfect, friendly superman face. That whole scene was classic Lois and Clark magic.

Thanks, but I felt kinda bullied when out of nowhere I got called an odd kid by Kane. Obviously my laughing wasn't odd when you understood where it came from and why I laughed. *sigh*

I see and I get what you're saying. It's probably best to move on though.

Only half a joke. Seriously, you're not going to see a difference in aesthetics between two beautiful cities, because I'm certain Metropolis is going to still be mostly rubble in the sequel, and if it isn't, that's really undermining the the first film.

I don't think most of Metropolis was destroyed and it's rumored that BvS takes place 2 years after MOS.
 
How am I hitting strawmen when it's you posting images of a burnt out hellscape and calling it Metropolis?

And after TWO FREAKIN' YEARS I think the center of Metropolis is not going to be a crater that ZOD INFLICTED on it.

Yeah, remember... Superman himself destroyed the WHOLE of Metropolis. Not ONE building or person survived.

Two things I never said, and two things the image does not depict.
 
^I got screwed cause people didn't get why I laughed. When Mrs. Kent explained it, and everybody saw they were wrong... nobody acknowledged it. :(

I just explained in the last thread why your post was misinterpreted. Yes, people thought you were laughing at something else. It's a misunderstanding. A new thread has started now. MOVE ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
I love that picture. Perfect, friendly superman face. That whole scene was classic Lois and Clark magic.



I see and I get what you're saying. It's probably best to move on though.



I don't think most of Metropolis was destroyed and it's rumored that BvS takes place 2 years after MOS.

I think it is absolutely unbelievable that Metropolis could be cleaned and rebuilt in two years. It's more ludicrous than believing a man can fly.
 
Playing the victim again, eh?

How so? I laughed at something, Mrs. Kent backed up what I was laughing about. You and others misinterpreted it and messed with me. Is it playing victim or being annoyed that you all did the mob mentality treatment over something you didn't get?
 
I think it is absolutely unbelievable that Metropolis could be cleaned and rebuilt in two years. It's more ludicrous than believing a man can fly.

The whole thing doesn't need to be rebuilt. It's a huge city. There can be sections that are still recovering or abandoned and other sections that still thrive like that pic I posted.
 
^I got screwed cause people didn't get why I laughed. When Mrs. Kent explained it, and everybody saw they were wrong... nobody acknowledged it. :(

I'm acknowledging it. He called you odd. You called him a name. T'was a misunderstanding.
 
How so? I laughed at something, Mrs. Kent backed up what I was laughing about. You and others misinterpreted it and messed with me. Is it playing victim or being annoyed that you all did the mob mentality treatment over something you didn't get?

Who cares, drop it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"