Rorschach2012
Batman is my Dad
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2006
- Messages
- 19,645
- Reaction score
- 2,521
- Points
- 103
i just think it's weird to count on a writer to make John better than he is in the comics. Why not just adapt the hero that's already a strong character in the comics? What you're saying just seems illogical to me.Well Dwayne McDuffie, Bruce Timm, and Paul Dini made John better then he was in the comics.
I agree it's more important for a writer to know the comics then the director but a writer also has to be creative.
Let's think of Batman for a second. Think about how Year One changed everything about Batman and added so much to his character and the character of Jim Gordon. Who's to say a writer can't do that to John?
and John Stewart on GL TAS was likable but he had no personal ties to Sinestro or Star Sapphire. The two big GL centric episodes featured John vs the Manhunters and John vs Despero. If you replace John with Hal in those stories, they would pretty much be exactly the same, there is no advantage to using John, while there is an advantage to using Hal.
Why would any GL fan want to see a GL movie series that doesn't feature Sinestro? And doing a Sinestro/John Stewart movie would be weird unless they did some extensive rewriting, and at that point.... it just seems silly to not use Hal.
You're a big fan of John Stewart, and you're even saying that you think he has to be reworked to lead a movie series... that says a lot that a big fan admits that major changes would have to be made...
With Hal, virtually no changes have to be made when adapting him into live action, the goldmine of material is already there in the comics to draw from.