Bryan Singer's X-Men 3

gambitfire said:
Well we didn't meet her other family we just walked into an empty home so we don't know what's up with that. and i'm not going to automatically assume anything.

You don't have to assume anythng.

Her family was weary of her "But what about Jean, what about her illness."

The family that she did trust, Xavier, and the X-Men, wanted to control her. With the Phoenix persona now in charge, she failed to see the reasoning behind Xavier's control, only that she was being controlled. She wasn't going to stay with the X-Men and be caged again.

gambitfire said:
Support?! how so?
Logan clearly offered the same kind of help and she didn't do go with him.
and i know that he wasn't going to "cage the beast". So then why didn't she just go with him?

Because going with Logan meant going back to the X-Men. And did you just plain forget the part that Jean did call out to Logan telepathically so he could come to save her? Phoenix didn't want to be caged. Jean wanted to be saved. Jean called out to Wolverine because she knew he'd try to save her. Phoenix, however, did not want to be caged, and thus didn't go back to the X-Men.

How did Magneto support Jean? "I want you to be what you are, as nature intended"........

There's no looking into anything here. It's spelled out for you in all CAPITOLS and bold lettering.

gambitfire said:
Yea but he's also scared s#!tless of her. :p

Yes, because he respects her power... and knows her capability. Xavier was scared ****less of her as well. The difference is, Xavier tried to control that power (for good reasons, but for reasons Phoenix failed to want to understand), while Magneto encouraged her and her powers.

gambitfire said:
I don't get this?
I felt the Phoenix was above this but w/e this isn't the comic books.

You're right, this isn't the comics. It's a much more realistic, serious tone. This isn't an all powerful cosmic entity inhabiting Jean's body. It's Jean herself. Jean is very much human. And with that come very human emotions. The seeking of acceptance, which Magneto provides, is a very huge and dominate human emotion.

gambitfire said:
Like i said before indirectly he's controlling her, he's clearly using her for his own cause. She can read minds but it seems like she never uses this to her advantage. I think she can be free on her own.

The difference is though, his "using" her is the means towards and end that they both want. So while he may want her for his own personal gain, his personal gain is also her personal gain.

gambitfire said:
no he said Jean....JEAN!! :whatever:

No, he said "I want you to be what you are, as nature intended"

gambitfire said:
and then bam Jean came back that's it. Did she read his mind? i dunno she can no longer do that or so it seems. :cmad:

What is most important to Magneto? His mutancy. She threatened that. She toyed with him, by dangling the most important thing to him and threatening to yank it away. He begged and pleaded with her. She said he was trying to control her. He said he wanted her to be what she is, as nature intended, and that the cure is meant for all of them. That remark touched a nerve.

I think that scene shows that she is a bit skeptical about siding with him. But he reveals his true colors, and makes a statement that touches her. She reacts to it.

gambitfire said:
so your saying she needs a cheerleader?
She's tortured because she just killed the man she loves and has a split personality dillema but she needs to be cheered on?
I'll take it that the Pheonix may want too but i don't see why or for what, she's clearly powerful enough as it is.

When you set out to do something, don't you want support, motivation, and encouragement? If you try out for your high school football team, don't you want your friends and family to be in your corner?

In Jean's mind, Xavier and her family weren't in her corner. Magneto was. She sided with the people who supported her in her goals (to be all powerful).

gambitfire said:
She was toying with Magneto...................................So i'm so supposed to also believe she's doing this for the good of mutant kind when what we see is a Phoenix who destroys anything for any reason...........(she did kill some brotherhood members remember ;) )

She's not doing it for the good of mutantkind, she's doing it for her own personal lust. And I mentioned that above. Phoenix is a mix between human emotion and lust for power. Both things can be true. And both are true.

Magneto is really out for personal gain as well... he wants to rule over everyone... mutants superior to humans. If he really had mutants' best interest at heart, he'd want co-existence. But he doesn't. He wants to be in power over humans.

gambitfire said:
Oh yea that really compares too a whole character purpose lost in an entire second act.

It's not lost. It might not be as well developed as it could be, but it's hardly lost.

gambitfire said:
The writers themselves said they didn't like where they went with her but they had no choice.

The writers said they wanted more Jean, but that the studio dictated more Magneto, Wolverine, and Storm. That's not the writers' faults.

gambitfire said:
Sure it makes sense for the plot, not the character.
Oh and Magneto gave her a home? Yea the woods are real nice. Maybe for encouragment but not a place to make permanent home amongs friends and things ( i don't mean literally but in the sense of it wasn't really a home as far as family goes)

It makes perfect sense for her character.

And a home is more than wood and walls and ceilings. A home can be just as much an emotional home as a physical home. Hence why Jean left the mansion, which was her "home", physically, because emotionally, she no longer had a home there.

gambitfire said:
But she was a Zombie...............:csad:

Her motives weren't explored as well as they could have / should have been. She wasn't a zombie.

gambitfire said:
Like the real Pheonix did?

Real Phoenix was a cosmic entity as well...

gambitfire said:
What motive she kills those she fought for, at that point the motive dies.
and your calling a piece of the source boring great.
She's a psycho we are made to assume she wants one thing but her actions speak differentley. Your looking way tooo into it.

I don't think you're looking enough into it.

gambitfire said:
and she was going to get this from the brotherhood ppl who have tried to kill her before?

Obviously, since she did.

And Magneto didn't try to kill her before...

gambitfire said:
Human emotions? the same chick who was shown toying with other ppl?
Magneto encourages her sure, but like i said he was USING her and was obviously scared of her, he knows better you either have this almighty entity on your side or you don't in which case your F*ed....................that sounds like a real loving motive.....COULD JEAN NOT SEE THIS?!

Yes, human emotion.

Much better than all powerful cosmic entities in my book.
 
X-Maniac said:
I wasn't addressing you personally. Where i said 'you' i meant it generally, replace it with 'a person'. You're being oversensitive!
I'm supposed to know that how?


X-Maniac said:
I know I'm a good person. I don't need affirmation from the anonymous world of the internet. Some people in real life say I'm the nicest person they've ever met - that's good enough for me!
Well it's the internet alot of things may just be misunderstandings. :meow:

X-Maniac said:
It would have been nice to ask them other things... But being able to ask them so much was a luxury we haven't really had before anyway. How many times can you ask the screenwriters questions like that? And, maybe, they didn't want to add anything else.

That's fine i'm just saying ppl where disrepectful that's all and they didn't couldn't properly back up some of their statements, wheather we are priveleged or not it doesn't change that.
 
Wow that's the lamest interpretation of the Phoenix personality if that's what the writers really intended, pls don't degrade the Phoenix any futher from the all-powerful cosmic entity to such a state of wimpiness. If Magneto is a powerful mutant the Phoenix is freakingly a Goddess (albet an very evil one). I would have liken what you say if the Phoenix wasn't a Level 5 mutant with immersely superior psychic and telepathic abilities! That's why I absolutely hated the mental block explanation and caged beast analogy because of how it perfectly fit the description of a madwoman just escaping from a mental institution going home to kill her husband and daddy who's trying to help her (misinterpreted as caging her), but ran off with their enemy instead who's obviously trying to make use of her (misinterpreted as helping her). Why should she even be afraid of being controlled, fixed, caged or cured when she's vastly more powerful than anyone in the whole universe. Can a Goddess be controlled, fixed, caged or even cured? You know what, after killing Xavier the Phoenix should have gone back to the mansion and mind-wipe Wolverine and Storm to be her domestic slaves. Now that's really what a really evil Goddess will do instead of walking ard doing nothing and looking confused.
 
kg576094 said:
Wow that's the lamest interpretation of the Phoenix personality if that's what the writers really intended, pls don't degrade the Phoenix any futher from the all-powerful cosmic entity to such a state of wimpiness. If Magneto is a powerful mutant the Phoenix is freakingly a Goddess (albet an very evil one). I would have liken what you say if the Phoenix wasn't a Level 5 mutant with immersely superior psychic and telepathic abilities! That's why I absolutely hated the mental block explanation and caged beast analogy because of how it perfectly fit the description of a madwoman just escaping from a mental institution going home to kill her husband and daddy who's trying to help her (misinterpreted as caging her), but ran off with their enemy instead who's obviously trying to make use of her (misinterpreted as helping her). Why should she even be afraid of being controlled, fixed, caged or cured when she's vastly more powerful than anyone in the whole universe. Can a Goddess be controlled, fixed, caged or even cured? You know what, after killing Xavier the Phoenix should have gone back to the mansion and mind-wipe Wolverine and Storm to be her domestic slaves. Now that's really what a really evil Goddess will do instead of walking ard doing nothing and looking confused.

In the movieverse of X-Men, we don't have cosmic entities. So it's not a question of her being 'vastly more powerful than anyone in the whole universe.'

Even comicbook Phoenix was able to be manipulated, corrupted, defeated, restrained and destroyed. Magneto twice defeated Phoenix in the comics, for instance. On one of those occasions, he killed her.

She has to be given some humanity, some weakness, or there wouldn't be a story. Readers/viewers have to be able to relate to the characters of they won't bother with the story.
 
X-Maniac said:
I agree it wasn't as explicitly stated as it could have been, but there are parts that hint at what is going on.

1) In the mansion infirmary - 'I don't wanna fix it'... then she leaves the mansion. This tells us she doesn't want to be controlled or fixed, and that she doesn't want to be at the mansion any more

2) At her parents' house - 'I have no home'... this tells us she feels she does not belong at the mansion or with the X-Men, because of what happened to Cyclops, because of what the mansion is associated with in her mind (many years of being controlled and repressed).

3) At her parents' house -'You'd think you want to cure her Charles' (or something very similar)... this ties in the cure with the mental blocks, both being forms of control that the recipients do not want!

4) 'My dear, come with me' - this tells us that Magneto knows Jean from long ago, that he empathises with what has happened to her (despite his regret over Xavier's death).

5) At the forest encampment, she finds a home, empathy (though Callisto is unsure), freedom ('I want you to be what you are, as nature intended') and she reminds Magneto that she does not want to be controlled, threatening him with the cure darts.

6) 'This cure is meant for all of us' is what he tells her at the forest camp and you can see her thinking about what he says. Her feelings on control of mutants are pretty obvious... And again at Alcatraz 'This is what they want for all of us' as Magneto is cured to stop him. The attempt to cure her with multiple cure darts is the final trigger.

I agree that more dialogue might have helped in places, but the information is all there in the above scenes.

Yes, but... she's an important character. You can't give 'hints' like they did with Beast, ( :cmad: ) that he once was part of the X-Men with the "I can't believe this once fit me" or that he once was human (see, we don't even know, in the Leech scene, if he wants to be human to get easily adapted, or he wants to be like he was before, or other reasons... :( )
How they handled that information is something, how I saw it, quite vague and vulgar. Phrases are way too obvious and there's no depth on them. They could've made something deeper, to demonstrate that the director/writer is willing to communicate what he wants to say. What I interpretated from Phoenix (not Jean) is a badass chick without personality who wants more power than what she already has, and kill anyone who stands in her way. And I'm sure the mythological goddesses weren't just that. I'm glad though, they didn't choose to do the planet eater or whatever with her lol.

gambitfire said:
Besides you've clearly seen this movie dozens of times Nell if the message wasn't sent across the first time around then it may not have been properly sent.

Yeah, that's it. I really tried liking the movie, watching it again and again, cuz Damn! it's X3! They were going to mantain loyalty over X2! And finally Beast included! But... no. It wasn't a Hulk, it wasn't a Spiderman, not even a 4F. Cuz a least the 4F had a clear story.
 
LostSon88 said:
You already posted that?! :huh:

No kidding. The reason I will continue to post this message is because I have no interest in debating X3 lovers anymore. I joined this forum in June and was hoping to finally have a friendly discussion over why I dislike X3. But after arguing with so many X3 lovers who are hostile towards everything I say my interest in debating them has completely evaporated. Some of the blame for the constant rudeness displayed in these threads is the result of X3 haters who bashed X3 lovers. Kuruwsa and thevileone were always rude towards X3 lovers by constantly attacking them. Thelastsunrise was also rude towards some X3 lovers and he was temporarily banned for his attacks. However, I believe the X3 lovers have treated the X3 haters with more disrespect than vice versa. X3 lovers like antarish, horrorfan, and blinfurry were downright viscious in their profanity laced tirades towards anyone who disliked X3.

One interesting thing I have noticed since joining this forum is most of the debates I got into were initiated by X3 lovers who were angry at my commentaries and wanted me to change my opinion about the film. It was never my intention to change anyone's opinion with my posts. I will admit that I have been rude towards X3 lovers but, all of the rudeness was instigated.

In retrospect, I've enjoyed most of the debates I've had with the X3 lovers on this forum. Even the ridiculous 7 day debate I had with X-Maniac was amusing. That debate took away most of the motivation I once had for discussing my X3 complaints and proved what I had suspected about many of the X3 lovers for a while. The love they have for X3 is just as fanatical as the hate the X3 haters have.

Finally, my objective for joining this forum in June was to be a voice against movie companies that abuse their power and rip of fans to make a quick buck. 20th century Fox knows about these types of websites and the fans who post in these threads. The former VP of Warner Brothers who was responsible for hideous films(Batman Forever, Batman and Robin, Catwoman) and ideas(Superman Lives) lost his job because of fanboy negative feedback. I think Tom Rothman should lose his job for not only being responsible for the development of numerous bad comic book movies but, for being so wishy-washy about his ideas for the future of Fox films. Here are some of the things Rothman has done in regards to X3 in the last 5 months:

Bragging about being happy with X3's box office numbers in mid June.(Suggesting that Fox was happy with Ratner and the X-Men series may continue.)

Confirming that Fox wouldn't make anymore X-Men films in August.(So Fox is not happy with Ratner and the box office numbers?)

Confirming that Fox is interested in hiring Singer to do X-Men 4 after he is done with Superman.(Fox wants to rehire someone they never respected and banned from the company lot?)

Confirming that Fox wants to hire Singer to do Wolverine even though rival studio Warner Bothers have him locked up for at least 2010 and possibly 2012.(Fox wants to rehire someone they never respected, banned from the company lot, and has no time to produce movies for them.)

These don't look like the actions of someone who knows how to successfully run a business. If my boss constantly changed her mind about me and my co-workers involvement with projects then I wouldn't get any work done and the company would lose money.

Therefore, I will keep posting my messages that bash X3 so pressure will be put on Fox to either get their act together or fire Rothman and the rest of his cronies that are ruining this company.




Here are some of the things that still bother me about X3.


Magneto inconsistently showing no compassion towards one of his best friends(Mystique) who got cured and showing compassion towards the death of one of his enemies(Xavier).

Jean irrationally killing off Cyclops.

The 2 second scene in which Xavier tells Logan and Oro to go to Akali Lake without any further explaination. WTH?!!!!

Magneto's convincing Jean to join his group brotherhood by saying "Come with me".

Magneto not being afraid of Jean joining his group after she just killed one of her friends(Xavier).

Jean's unclear motivation for joining Magneto's group. Unless acting like a zombie and doing almost nothing around the brotherhood for the rest of the film was her motivation.

Magneto wanting Jean to stay with the brotherhood after Callisto warns him that she is dangerous and after Jean threatens Magneto with the cure needles.

Magneto hiring an army of mutants who have useless powers.

Jean standing around in the end battle scene doing nothing for the majority.

Jean inconsistently killing everyone when she is threatened by the marines behind her with the cure guns but, not killing anyone at the beginning of the attack when she was also threatened by the same marines firing their cure guns at her, Magneto, and his army.

Jean hurting Logan but, not killing him. She killed Xavier because he threatened her by trying to get into her mind but, she was not threatened after reading Wolverine's mind in the final scene?!!!!

Using the mutant cure as a plot device to push the movie forward and then show it's irrelevance in the final scene with Eric at a park.

The horrible looking wire work of beast at the end. Those scenes reminded me of the killer rabbit scene from Monty Python and the holy grail.

Magneto deciding to waste his army on something he, Jean, or the both of them could have done all by themselves.
 
I have to add something to this TheWeePeople. I believe posters purposefully misunderstand my opinions and reasonings.

First of all, I never attacked anyone for a difference of opinion. I only attacked when my friends or myself was put down or attacked because we were disappointed in X3. I never called anyone a moron, a cyber terrorist, a loser, or made any sexual innuendo insults towards them or any of their family members. My posts while they were harsh I admit, never really got personal or were made to hurt anyones feelings.

I admit that perhaps I should've been a bit more calmer and more intelligent in my posts, but it was hard when you were attacked and called a "fake superhero fan" for simply expressing disappointment. I made mention that I felt the Saw trilogy, Pirates of the Caribbean, and Superman Returns were infinitely better than X3 in general.

In response a poster told me to go "*********e myself into a stupor over serial killers, pirates, Superman, and Spider-Man". That response was from an X3 supporter who, still to this very day, continually posts in a thread for those who didn't like the film and still defends it as though he has a personal stake in it.

I did in fact call some people "loyalists". I admit that I shouldn't have resorted to any name calling and I was wrong for that, but in the end they would start the flame war and would run to a mod when people called them on their lies.

It's because of X3 supporters that some people are afraid to voice their opinion for fear of being attacked. I will not stand down or shut up because some X3 supporter gets upset, gets defensive, and feels as though if they defend it enough Ratner, Kinberg, or Penn will give them a cookie. I stand by my opinion. I believe this film isn't good and that for it to be a closer it's very anti-climatic, not emotional, no character development, and just mindless action over mindless action.

If people enjoy it that's fine. But in the end what matters to me is what I like and what I consider great. It didn't meet my expectations after the final result and that's the way it'll be until a restart or a sequel is made.

My initial hate and disappointment isn't with the movie itself.

Believe it or not, my hate and disappointment is really towards Ratner, Penn, Kinberg, and Rothman for intentionally misleading fans with empty promises when certain things were revealed. For example Xavier dying, Mystique being cured, Cyclops dying, Wolverine being the savior again, and Rogue taking the cure.

It's not my fault that I expected a 2-3 hour epic film that would rival Return of the King. Penn, Kinberg, and Ratner continually compared it to Return of the King and because of their words I expected it that particular result. I gave them all a chance, as a fan I was pumped for the film and even defend them several times when fans would put them down.

I paid my money and I was disappointed with the result. As a fan of the comics, as a fan of the first two films, and as a fan of the animated series I felt that they spit in my fave with spite and venomous hate.
 
Wow that's the lamest interpretation of the Phoenix personality if that's what the writers really intended, pls don't degrade the Phoenix any futher from the all-powerful cosmic entity to such a state of wimpiness.

Wimpiness? We are talking about the same character right? The one that...every time she was threatened...put a serious whooping on whoever did it, or scared the crap out of them? The one that was disingitrating almost everything and everyone with a thought at the end of X3? The one with the godlike powers?

Why should she even be afraid of being controlled, fixed, caged or cured when she's vastly more powerful than anyone in the whole universe. Can a Goddess be controlled, fixed, caged or even cured?

Why should she be afraid of being controlled, caged, etc? Because she HAD been in the past. Because that's how emotions and psychology works. Because she (Dark Phoenix the personality) WAS controlled and caged. For years. Inside Jean. When you're say, a woman who has been abused in the past, what do you tend to fear most? That's right. Abuse. So if you're a personality who has been caged...do you want to go back to being caged?

It's a lot like what happened in FLOWERS FOR ALGERNON.

In the movieverse of X-Men, we don't have cosmic entities. So it's not a question of her being 'vastly more powerful than anyone in the whole universe.'

Seems like she is a pretty damn powerful cosmic being anyway (she can take things apart on the atomic level, that's pretty impressive), so any issues with this should really be a moot point. No other characters in the X-movies have been shown to have the ability to alter matter itself.

Even comicbook Phoenix was able to be manipulated, corrupted, defeated, restrained and destroyed. Magneto twice defeated Phoenix in the comics, for instance. On one of those occasions, he killed her.

Exactly. Phoenix is not really immortal in the strictest sense.

She has to be given some humanity, some weakness, or there wouldn't be a story. Readers/viewers have to be able to relate to the characters of they won't bother with the story.
Exactly.

Yes, but... she's an important character. You can't give 'hints' like they did with Beast.

They didn't just "give hints". They showed you these things. See, here's the thing I find interesting. Bryan Singer "hints" at things in X-MEN and X2 (Pyro's feelings toward Bobby and the X-Men's values) and people call it subtle. Brett Ratner does almost the same exact thing, or better, flat out puts overt stuff in the movie that you're supposed to figure out easily, and people go "It's not even there".

How they handled that information is something, how I saw it, quite vague and vulgar. Phrases are way too obvious and there's no depth on them.

This is quite simply incorrect. There absolutely depth to a lot of the dialogue found in X3. Even some of the puns have some depth to them.

No kidding. The reason I will continue to post this message is because I have no interest in debating X3 lovers anymore. I joined this forum in June and was hoping to finally have a friendly discussion over why I dislike X3. But after arguing with so many X3 lovers who are hostile towards everything I say my interest in debating them has completely evaporated. Some of the blame for the constant rudeness displayed in these threads is the result of X3 haters who bashed X3 lovers. Kuruwsa and thevileone were always rude towards X3 lovers by constantly attacking them. Thelastsunrise was also rude towards some X3 lovers and he was temporarily banned for his attacks. However, I believe the X3 lovers have treated the X3 haters with more disrespect than vice versa. X3 lovers like antarish, horrorfan, and blinfurry were downright viscious in their profanity laced tirades towards anyone who disliked X3.

"He/she started it!"

You know what I find amusing? We're on a message board, discussing a movie where the main thematics are about tolerance and seeing both sides of an issue...and yet so many people resort to a form of what boils down to bigotry...labels like "X3 haters" or "X3 lovers", and spit them out with so much venom and hatred. Didn't you all learn anything from years of X-Men comics and movies? Obviously not how to be objective about anything. Or tolerant.

Bragging about being happy with X3's box office numbers in mid June.(Suggesting that Fox was happy with Ratner and the X-Men series may continue.)

Rothman can't brag about fantastic box office numbers? X3 was a huge financial success. Why shouldn't he be pleased?

Confirming that Fox wouldn't make anymore X-Men films in August.(So Fox is not happy with Ratner and the box office numbers?)

I don't recall him "confirming" anything. He's said that this is the end to the trilogy Bryan Singer began. But the man's helped greenlight WOLVERINE and YOUNG MAGNETO. Don't believe everything you hear, or read too much into it unless you're considering all the angles.

Confirming that Fox is interested in hiring Singer to do X-Men 4 after he is done with Superman.(Fox wants to rehire someone they never respected and banned from the company lot?)

Who says that FOX never respected Singer? HE stopped working for THEM and jumped to a rival company during an important project's development, so of course he wasn't permitted on the company lot. He'd just screwed them over, and he didn't work for them anymore. They're allowed to be upset with him.

Confirming that Fox wants to hire Singer to do Wolverine even though rival studio Warner Bothers have him locked up for at least 2010 and possibly 2012.(Fox wants to rehire someone they never respected, banned from the company lot, and has no time to produce movies for them.)

You make a lot of major assumptions about people.

These don't look like the actions of someone who knows how to successfully run a business.

Then why has the business he's been running been so successful?

If my boss constantly changed her mind about me and my co-workers involvement with projects then I wouldn't get any work done and the company would lose money.

Who says Rothman ever changed his mind about Singer? It was, if you will recall, Singer's decision to leave X3 to do SUPERMAN RETURNS for a rival studio. FOX didn't ask him to leave, or fire him. Singer chose to leave of his own free will. And various FOX spokespeople have said since Day One that maybe they'd like to have him back.

Therefore, I will keep posting my messages that bash X3 so pressure will be put on Fox to either get their act together or fire Rothman and the rest of his cronies that are ruining this company.

That's not gonna happen. Especially if you just keep insulting the company. Go fight a battle you can win.

Magneto inconsistently showing no compassion towards one of his best friends(Mystique) who got cured and showing compassion towards the death of one of his enemies(Xavier).

We've discussed this. You showed a complete lack of common sense regarding the scene. I'll try again. Magneto absolutely shows compassion toward Mystique (just not much) and he shows reverence for the person she was as a mutant, and he never actually shows COMPASSION about Xavier's death. He shows REGRET, and reverence for who Xavier was. Regret and compassion are not the same thing.

Jean irrationally killing off Cyclops.

Of course its irrational. She's just been reborn as an irrational creature of instict. Rationality doesn't really enter into it that much. That's part of the characterization. She's supposed to be irrational.

The 2 second scene in which Xavier tells Logan and Oro to go to Akali Lake without any further explaination. WTH?!!!!

It's called a bridging scene. It's so the audience doesn't go "How'd they know to go to Alkali Lake"? It's short, because a long character development scene ending with Xavier asking the X-Men to go to Alkali Lake would kill the tension of the previous moment. As such, the scene indicates that something horrible has happened, and that it must be investigated immediately.

Magneto's convincing Jean to join his group brotherhood by saying "Come with me".

It seems to me like that's just what he used to convince her to leave the house. Not to join the Brotherhood. It's more likely that his speech to her about being a goddess is what convinces her to join up (which she didn't seem to do anyway in any real fashion).

Magneto not being afraid of Jean joining his group after she just killed one of her friends(Xavier).

Who says he's not afraid? Clearly he respects her power, and he doesn't want to control her (as Charles did) so why should he be afraid of her? Just because you're afraid someone might possibly hurt you somehow if you piss them off doesn't mean you can't interact with them.

Jean's unclear motivation for joining Magneto's group. Unless acting like a zombie and doing almost nothing around the brotherhood for the rest of the film was her motivation.

Several people have explained this to you. The reasoning is made clear in the film. And by the way, it's amusing that this bothers you so much, because if you think about it, Jean's motivations for joining the actual X-Men team in this franchise are equally "unclear".

Magneto wanting Jean to stay with the brotherhood after Callisto warns him that she is dangerous and after Jean threatens Magneto with the cure needles.

The biggest risks often net the biggest gains. And it speaks to Magneto's ego, and belief that what he is doing with Jean is going to work.

Magneto hiring an army of mutants who have useless powers.

Magneto's army did not have useless powers. We just didn't SEE what powers each mutant had, or if they had amazing powers. They were defeated, yes, but that doesn't make their powers useless. It means the X-Men beat them. Without the X-Men there, though, Magneto's army would have rolled right over the government's.

Jean standing around in the end battle scene doing nothing for the majority.

She is, as others have pointed out, supposed to be surveying what she considers lesser beings in their petty conflicts which don't seem to affect her. You can't bring her into the battle as a writer and start having her just do godlike things, because then it would be over, and the X-Men would be dead, and humans would be screwed. Besides, Dark Phoenix is shown not to care what happens if it doesn't involve her. And she clearly doesn't care about what's going on until she herself is directly threatened.

Jean inconsistently killing everyone when she is threatened by the marines behind her with the cure guns but, not killing anyone at the beginning of the attack when she was also threatened by the same marines firing their cure guns at her, Magneto, and his army.

Maybe she knew full well that Magneto could handle it. Magneto did handle it. Had he not, odds are Dark Phoenix would have, had SHE been threatened. She wasn't, in any real way. The needles never got near her.

Jean hurting Logan but, not killing him. She killed Xavier because he threatened her by trying to get into her mind but, she was not threatened after reading Wolverine's mind in the final scene?!!!!

Ah, but Xavier didn't just want to get into her mind...he wanted to IMPRISON her again. Wolverine DIDN'T want that (and couldn't have anyway), and that's made clear earlier in the film. He just wanted to tell Jean that he'd do anything for her, and that he loved her, and would do what he had to to help her. And it's entirely possible that Jean was fighting Dark Phoenix for control because she didn't want to hurt her friend. Entirely possible.

Using the mutant cure as a plot device to push the movie forward and then show it's irrelevance in the final scene with Eric at a park.

You really just don't get it. You continue to think the cure is just a plot device, and it's not. There's more depth to it than that. The cure wearing off at the end of the movie is the POINT. It's the entire resolution of the cure thematic. The point is that things go in cycles, and that the world is going to have the same problems it always had. "Curing" someone of their "differences" or ideologies doesn't work.

The horrible looking wire work of beast at the end. Those scenes reminded me of the killer rabbit scene from Monty Python and the holy grail.

And what exactly does an incredibly agile man look like when leaping over a rooftop and landing hard yet gracefully?

Magneto deciding to waste his army on something he, Jean, or the both of them could have done all by themselves.

This is an assumption on your part. Seeing as how the movie makes it obvious that he isn't about to be able to TELL Dark Phoenix to do anything, and would have been screwed to high heaven without Arclight to take out the cure weapons, had he tried to go in alone. Magneto's not dumb enough to march into battle and think he's got all the advantages. Which he didn't. He made a smart move testing out the army's strategies with his first wave, and having Juggernaut there to go after Leech. It's much safer for Magneto himself, which we know he likes from X-MEN.
 
Theweepeople said:
I think Tom Rothman should lose his job for not only being responsible for the development of numerous bad comic book movies but, for being so wishy-washy about his ideas for the future of Fox films.

Yes, but Rothman also allowed the hiring of Bryan Singer and his vision for the X-MEN films. And he support Ratner and his approach, which was exceedingly close to what Singer had done with the first two installments. People tend to forget this.

They make Rothman out a giant monster when in fact his unsuredness was completely founded before the success of X-MEN and X2. X-Men and comic-books were an untested property on the big screen. And some of Singer's ideas for X2 was exceedingly costy. Just look at SUPERMAN RETURNS, whose budget balloned to over $200 million. And look how much that film made.


Here are some of the things Rothman has done in regards to X3 in the last 5 months:

Bragging about being happy with X3's box office numbers in mid June.(Suggesting that Fox was happy with Ratner and the X-Men series may continue.)

What's wrong with that? X3 was a success, so Rothman should be appropriately happy.

Confirming that Fox wouldn't make anymore X-Men films in August.(So Fox is not happy with Ratner and the box office numbers?)

He said it was the end of these "cycle" of films, and not the last X-Men film period. Even Ralph Winter said that X3 isn't the last X-Men film and that there will be more.

Confirming that Fox is interested in hiring Singer to do X-Men 4 after he is done with Superman.(Fox wants to rehire someone they never respected and banned from the company lot?)

Rothman didn't say ANYTHING in regards to that. That was some report from a Hawaiian website which they said (and not derived from a quote by Singer) that he was "approached" to direct X4 and that he expressed interest in "reading" the script for WOLVERINE. Basically says that Singer is still interested in the franchise and nothing more.

Confirming that Fox wants to hire Singer to do Wolverine even though rival studio Warner Bothers have him locked up for at least 2010 and possibly 2012.(Fox wants to rehire someone they never respected, banned from the company lot, and has no time to produce movies for them.)

Where are you reading this? Singer said (in a report) that he was interested in READING the WOLVERINE script. Big difference then "Fox want[ing] to hire Singer to do [WOLVERINE]".

These don't look like the actions of someone who knows how to successfully run a business.

...and you know how to run a major cooperation?

If my boss constantly changed her mind about me and my co-workers involvement with projects then I wouldn't get any work done and the company would lose money.

Rothman has remained consistent for months. He said X3 would be the end of these "cycle" of stories and it was. He said that he wouldn't discount X4 but said that it wouldn't be anytime soon. Nothing new or inconsistent.

Therefore, I will keep posting my messages that bash X3 so pressure will be put on Fox to either get their act together or fire Rothman and the rest of his cronies that are ruining this company.

Yes. I'm sure they'll listen to you. Because you have so much business experience, knowledge and expertise where Rothman and his "cronies" don't...?


Here are some of the things that still bother me about X3.
Magneto inconsistently showing no compassion towards one of his best friends(Mystique) who got cured and showing compassion towards the death of one of his enemies(Xavier).

Magneto was building an army for a war. He would save "compassion" for lost comrades like Mystique and Xavier when the war was over. When you lose soldiers, you momentarily mourn (which Magneto did) then move on. You don't spend useful time mourning incessantly. You have a war to win. And Magneto was deadset on that mission of supremacy over the homo sapiens who were threatening to strip him of his indidivuality.

And I guess you missed where Magneto gave Pyro a lecture about the importance of Xavier in the mutant state of affairs and how even quietly Magneto expressed regret for his death.

Jean irrationally killing off Cyclops.

Jean was out-of-control. The Dark Phoenix was nearly always out-of-control in the movie. Her arc was about repressed power and how letting it unleashed is completely and utterly dangerous. She wasn't safe around anyone. The Dark Phoenix represented both internally and externally the corruption of power when you repress something that needs to be let out constructively and not as it was in X3.

The 2 second scene in which Xavier tells Logan and Oro to go to Akali Lake without any further explaination. WTH?!!!!

Logan and Storm knew something was wrong. Thus the physic disturbance that EVERYONE in Xavier's Mansion felt. There was no further explanation needed.

Magneto's convincing Jean to join his group brotherhood by saying "Come with me".

Jean was obviously confused over what has just happened -- most likely the Dark Phoenix side of her had ceased and Jean had returned, like how Logan confronted her over Scott's death and she was confused. She turned to Magneto, a regal, father figure in a complete and utter state of confusion and he guided (aka mantipulated) her to his side.

Magneto not being afraid of Jean joining his group after she just killed one of her friends(Xavier).

If he was, do you really expect him to show it?

Jean's unclear motivation for joining Magneto's group. Unless acting like a zombie and doing almost nothing around the brotherhood for the rest of the film was her motivation.

She didn't need to have a motivation. She was Phoenix, doing whatever she pleased. She wasn't Magneto's "puppet" or his "underling". She was there because she wanted to be. And she reacted when she was tested, but Magneto didn't test her, so she could (and did) remain emotionless, because the Phoenix doesn't really have any emotion -- she's all fury and rage. And when she's not, she's calm.

Magneto wanting Jean to stay with the brotherhood after Callisto warns him that she is dangerous and after Jean threatens Magneto with the cure needles.

Magneto probably felt that Phoenix was better on his side than anyone else's, aka the X-Men. If they had got to her, he'd lose an advantage. But with her on his side, even if he didn't use her, it left the X-Men and everyone with a disadvantage.

Thus the line "And we have ours" in regards to weapons as he speechifies in the forest to his followers.

Magneto hiring an army of mutants who have useless powers.

Power in numbers. Magneto wanted to create the allusion of an army, to show the X-Men and the humans that mutants aren't a force to be messed with.

Jean standing around in the end battle scene doing nothing for the majority.

She wasn't provoked. When she was, she acted.

Jean inconsistently killing everyone when she is threatened by the marines behind her with the cure guns but, not killing anyone at the beginning of the attack when she was also threatened by the same marines firing their cure guns at her, Magneto, and his army.

Because Magneto repelled them. If he hadn't, Phoenix would've destroyed them also.

Jean hurting Logan but, not killing him. She killed Xavier because he threatened her by trying to get into her mind but, she was not threatened after reading Wolverine's mind in the final scene?!!!!

Phoenix was toying with him. And Phoenix deliberately wanted to kill Xavier for what he did to her. Logan hadn't expressed that type of control or violation of boundaries, in fact he expressed the complete opposite. And Logan screamed out to Jean, and in her confusion, she responded. Thus her line "Save me". Jean was struggling to break free of the Phoenix entity and subconsciously perhaps a part of her was keeping Logan alive to free her.

Using the mutant cure as a plot device to push the movie forward and then show it's irrelevance in the final scene with Eric at a park.

Magneto is a strong mutant, perhaps one of the strongest. It's quite possible that the really strong mutants like Magneto could show some dominance over the cure whereas other less powerful mutants like Rogue don't develop a dominance over it. Remember, we only saw Magneto SLIGHTLY gaining his powers...of course, it could've just passed, a little moment that Magneto had managed to grasp. We don't know. The filmmakers wisely left it ambigious.

The horrible looking wire work of beast at the end. Those scenes reminded me of the killer rabbit scene from Monty Python and the holy grail.

Nonsense. The wire work was A LOT more sophisticated and better executed than anything in any Monty Python movie and you know it.

Magneto deciding to waste his army on something he, Jean, or the both of them could have done all by themselves.

Power in numbers, like I said before. Magneto wanted to create an army to show the humans and the X-Men that mutants can and are an unstoppable force. Magneto was like a terrorist in X3, and don't terrorists care desperately about keeping the infrastructure of their organization to create an allusion of "a unit"? I think so.
 
LastSunrise1981 said:
I have to add something to this TheWeePeople. I believe posters purposefully misunderstand my opinions and reasonings.

First of all, I never attacked anyone for a difference of opinion. I only attacked when my friends or myself was put down or attacked because we were disappointed in X3. I never called anyone a moron, a cyber terrorist, a loser, or made any sexual innuendo insults towards them or any of their family members. My posts while they were harsh I admit, never really got personal or were made to hurt anyones feelings.

I admit that perhaps I should've been a bit more calmer and more intelligent in my posts, but it was hard when you were attacked and called a "fake superhero fan" for simply expressing disappointment. I made mention that I felt the Saw trilogy, Pirates of the Caribbean, and Superman Returns were infinitely better than X3 in general.

In response a poster told me to go "*********e myself into a stupor over serial killers, pirates, Superman, and Spider-Man". That response was from an X3 supporter who, still to this very day, continually posts in a thread for those who didn't like the film and still defends it as though he has a personal stake in it.

I did in fact call some people "loyalists". I admit that I shouldn't have resorted to any name calling and I was wrong for that, but in the end they would start the flame war and would run to a mod when people called them on their lies.

It's because of X3 supporters that some people are afraid to voice their opinion for fear of being attacked. I will not stand down or shut up because some X3 supporter gets upset, gets defensive, and feels as though if they defend it enough Ratner, Kinberg, or Penn will give them a cookie. I stand by my opinion. I believe this film isn't good and that for it to be a closer it's very anti-climatic, not emotional, no character development, and just mindless action over mindless action.

If people enjoy it that's fine. But in the end what matters to me is what I like and what I consider great. It didn't meet my expectations after the final result and that's the way it'll be until a restart or a sequel is made.

My initial hate and disappointment isn't with the movie itself.

Believe it or not, my hate and disappointment is really towards Ratner, Penn, Kinberg, and Rothman for intentionally misleading fans with empty promises when certain things were revealed. For example Xavier dying, Mystique being cured, Cyclops dying, Wolverine being the savior again, and Rogue taking the cure.

It's not my fault that I expected a 2-3 hour epic film that would rival Return of the King. Penn, Kinberg, and Ratner continually compared it to Return of the King and because of their words I expected it that particular result. I gave them all a chance, as a fan I was pumped for the film and even defend them several times when fans would put them down.

I paid my money and I was disappointed with the result. As a fan of the comics, as a fan of the first two films, and as a fan of the animated series I felt that they spit in my fave with spite and venomous hate.

We all need to just get over ourselves, really.

I believe many of the same things about X3 "haters" that you believe about X3 supporters. As an X3 supporter, I also acknowledge that the attitudes of some of the other supporters can be just as condescending. I don't speak out on it, perhaps because it's not directed towards me, but I find myself rolling my eyes at many of the things that Guard and X-Maniac say because, yes, they can be very condescending.

But the honest truth, is that we're all acting like a bunch of school children (and that includes myself). We are all playing the "he started it" excuse to justify our hostile attitudes towards each other. I know I have felt, not offended, but personally attacked and disrespected, and I don't appreciate that.

On the same hand, I also know that many arguing for the same things that I have have done the same thing to others who disagreed.

We need to get out of the "he started it" mentality, and just be the bigger person.

I honestly feel that some of the reasons that people use to complain about this film are utterly invalid. It's absolute absurdity what these people are arguing. And that's why I've been aggressive in my own arguements.

I also acknowledge that this film has done things that upset fans of the X-Men. Hell, they upset me. I understand there are legitamate reasons for disliking this film (as there are for any film). And a lot of those legitamate reasons are things I'd agree with, even if I like the film.

I love the film, personally. I believe it told the best story of all the 3 films.

I also feel that in terms of actual storytelling, it wasn't the best. Singer's stories weren't better, but he was a better storyteller with them. He developed them more, and gave them the depth they needed.

Ratner and his team, while telling a better story, didn't give it the depth and development they needed. They told us something, and then never built on it. They left what they told us to carry through the rest of the film. Those are definate flaws in the films.

Overall, I think the story that it told, and the events that it portrayed, carried the film, and made it just as good as X2, and better than X-Men. I may even say it's my favorite of the movies, simply because of the story being told.

In terms of a piece of filmmaking, X2 and even X-Men are better. X-Men: The Last Stand did not give payoff to plot developments, and even ignored others, while giving us the bare bones to establish the important ones.

Those bare bones are there. They work in the story. And by putting the rest of the pieces together, I am able to understand the story, connect it to X-Men and X2, and enjoy it.

But the film didn't put any meat on those bones, and really, the film did suffer because of it. Not to the point where I dislike it, but obviously for others it did reach that point.

As an adaptation, I'm torn, because it's the best and the worst at the same time. Where X-Men and X2 got details wrong, yet maintained the essence, X-Men: The Last Stand made some changes to the essence of the stories they were telling. Yet, at the same time, they got many of the details right that Singer could never dream of getting. And in some ways, captured another essence...

My complaint with people who ***** about the film isn't the fact that they disagree with me... it's what they use to support their cause. I think it's absurd reasoning and logic behind not liking the film. To be blunt and honest, I think it's totally incredible. It's not reasoning and logic that I can take seriously, by any definition of the phrase.

Again, that's not to say that disliking the movie is wrong. It absolutley isn't. But if the reasoning for disliking this film are the reasons that have been stated, then that's more on the end of the viewer not being able to suspend belief and accept sci-fi fantasy storytelling, not on the end of the film maker for making a flawed product.

Because there are real flaws in this film that don't boil down to sci-fi fantasy suspension of belief... flaws that I as a lover of X-Men: The Last Stand totally see when watching the film, flaws that bug me when I am watching and enjoying the film. Filmmaking flaws that weren't in Bryan Singer's films. Filmmaking flaws that could turn somebody off of enjoying the movie, because it is actual filmmaking flaws.

Not things that require suspension of belief, something that should be a given when watching sci-fi or fntasy films.
 
Here are some of the things that still bother me about X3.


Magneto inconsistently showing no compassion towards one of his best friends(Mystique) who got cured and showing compassion towards the death of one of his enemies(Xavier).

Jean irrationally killing off Cyclops.

The 2 second scene in which Xavier tells Logan and Oro to go to Akali Lake without any further explaination. WTH?!!!!

Magneto's convincing Jean to join his group brotherhood by saying "Come with me".

Magneto not being afraid of Jean joining his group after she just killed one of her friends(Xavier).

Jean's unclear motivation for joining Magneto's group. Unless acting like a zombie and doing almost nothing around the brotherhood for the rest of the film was her motivation.

Magneto wanting Jean to stay with the brotherhood after Callisto warns him that she is dangerous and after Jean threatens Magneto with the cure needles.

Magneto hiring an army of mutants who have useless powers.

Jean standing around in the end battle scene doing nothing for the majority.

Jean inconsistently killing everyone when she is threatened by the marines behind her with the cure guns but, not killing anyone at the beginning of the attack when she was also threatened by the same marines firing their cure guns at her, Magneto, and his army.

Jean hurting Logan but, not killing him. She killed Xavier because he threatened her by trying to get into her mind but, she was not threatened after reading Wolverine's mind in the final scene?!!!!

Using the mutant cure as a plot device to push the movie forward and then show it's irrelevance in the final scene with Eric at a park.

The horrible looking wire work of beast at the end. Those scenes reminded me of the killer rabbit scene from Monty Python and the holy grail.

Magneto deciding to waste his army on something he, Jean, or the both of them could have done all by themselves.
 
The Guard said:
Like I said, in one ear and out the other.

This is from Ian Mckellan official site, and I quote...

Q: I saw "X-Men: The Last Stand" tonight and enjoyed it very much. However, after I'd gone home and visited a website where the film was being discussed, I learned that the last scene in the film was inserted after the final credits. Like many in the theater, I opted to leave when the film appeared to be over and I'd read the main credits. I'd be most grateful if you'd convey this message to the film's director, or to whoever is responsible for this stupid arrangement.
A: Not having seen the concluding epilogue at Cannes where I and the rest of the audience assumed, like you, that all was over when it appeared to be, I share a little your irritation. Perhaps it was a device to lure audiences back for a second look. Perhaps it was a bit of a joke. Perhaps it meant nothing at all. All complaints to Brett Ratner.
Hes right you know

From http://www.mckellen.com/epost/x3/060830.htm
 
Silvermoth said:
This is from Ian Mckellan official site, and I quote...


Hes right you know

From http://www.mckellen.com/epost/x3/060830.htm

Yet more grasping for external justifications. But at least you haven't lapsed into a self-parody of repetition like Theweepeople, who appears to have his keyboard stuck on 'copy and paste' functions because he has nothing else to say. He must the love the taste of spam.

McKellen said that in August and most of us knew about it, as many of us here check that site. I've even had questions answered on there - several of them! He merely means he was entirely unaware of the final scene - as he was supposed to be, as Ratner and Patrick Stewart did it in secret.
 
A question for those who are still interested or "in-the-know" about Singer's version: how was he going to approach it? I don't mean to cut into the current argument, just curious. I figured that if there was a place to ask how this (and the supposed sequel) would have been from a plot POV it would be here.
 
ChibiKiriyama said:
A question for those who are still interested or "in-the-know" about Singer's version: how was he going to approach it? I don't mean to cut into the current argument, just curious. I figured that if there was a place to ask how this (and the supposed sequel) would have been from a plot POV it would be here.

Without meaning to sound rude, it's been asked and anwered countless times. If you read this thread, you will see what he intended. Read it and discover!

However, I will answer briefly. He says he only had a rough story mapped out on his computer. He apparently planned Gambit and Emma Frost and wanted the Phoenix story spread over an X3 and X4. He also wanted more of Wolverine's origin and there were question marks over Halle/Storm. He didn't do the character justice, Halle was aware of fans' disappointment, she probably wouldn't have come back if the role wasn't larger than before, he might have written Storm out or reduced the role to a cameo anyway. Storm and Singer don't seem to go well together.

But he left the project, taking with him an actor who is key to the Phoenix saga. Which explains why - poltiically and practically - Cyclops gets a small role in X3.
 
The writers said it themselves scheduling problems wasn't why Cyclops got a small role in X3.....he was given enough time the writers didn't take the time in to consideration....
 
X-Maniac said:
Without meaning to sound rude, it's been asked and anwered countless times. If you read this thread, you will see what he intended. Read it and discover!

However, I will answer briefly. He says he only had a rough story mapped out on his computer. He apparently planned Gambit and Emma Frost and wanted the Phoenix story spread over an X3 and X4. He also wanted more of Wolverine's origin and there were question marks over Halle/Storm. He didn't do the character justice, Halle was aware of fans' disappointment, she probably wouldn't have come back if the role wasn't larger than before, he might have written Storm out or reduced the role to a cameo anyway. Storm and Singer don't seem to go well together.

But he left the project, taking with him an actor who is key to the Phoenix saga. Which explains why - poltiically and practically - Cyclops gets a small role in X3.

What a lie. He said countless times that X3/X4 would be James and Famke's film. Wolverine would be there, but he wouldn't be there in the fashion that YOU want him to be in.

As for taking with him the actor who is key to the Phoenix Saga. You have Fox to blame for waiting so long to sign Singer again, lock up the actors, and so forth. In the end the company and the film you support shot themselves in the foot by giving people the runaround.
 
Mike059jig said:
The writers said it themselves scheduling problems wasn't why Cyclops got a small role in X3.....he was given enough time the writers didn't take the time in to consideration....

Producer Lauren Shuler Donner herself says on the DVD 'We didn't have him [Marsden] for very long.'

We've also heard that the writers were told to just write him out as having died between X2 and X3, they fought to include him but were told exactly how many scenes and how many minutes Cyclops was to have in the movie.

If they were playing revenge or politics for Marsden leaving for SR, they will never admit it.
 
LastSunrise1981 said:
What a lie. He said countless times that X3/X4 would be James and Famke's film. Wolverine would be there, but he wouldn't be there in the fashion that YOU want him to be in.

As for taking with him the actor who is key to the Phoenix Saga. You have Fox to blame for waiting so long to sign Singer again, lock up the actors, and so forth. In the end the company and the film you support shot themselves in the foot by giving people the runaround.

As far as I understood, Singer did want a bit more exploration of Wolverine (but not a central part) - perhaps he was doing that to try to appease the studio. I'm not lying, I'm repeating information stated elsewhere on here.

I agree, Fox did take too long to sign up and lock the actors. It can't be easy though with this huge cast. And i don't 'support' Fox, but I can understand their business decisions like keeping the release date and working with the actors who were available. There were those who weren't available for long (Marsden, Paquin) and those who expressed the view this would be their last X-movie (Stewart, Romijn). They didn't necessarily need to dead-end those actors' characters though.. that's the controversial bit.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"