• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Fantasy Disney Developing Live-Action 'Snow White' (Exclusive)

If it can stay in the 40s, honestly a win at this point. Also going to be that guy and say, it's probably better then the original. As the original isn't much of anything honestly.
From a storytelling perspective, the only Disney animated movies from that era that actually hold up 80+ years later are Pinocchio and Bambi. The original movie is revered for being a pioneer in feature length animation, as well it should, but there's not a whole lot of meat to the story. Snow White is such a useless protagonist in it that the movie might as well be called The Queen and the Seven Dwarfs.
 
I’m actually surprised at their restraint for not doing live action Atlantis with Tom Holland and Zendaya yet. :sneeze:
b818328d-9f0a-4bec-a08d-de1f3c0ce07a_text.gif


They're making Nolan money now. :o
 
It's an interesting world we live in when she has one and Robert De Niro doesn't.

Some actors don’t want it. I forget which actor declined because he didn’t want to be ‘’stepped on’’ or something of sorts. Orange Man has one, but can’t tell you why.
 
Someone get ChatGPT to make the teaser poster. :o
 
Just got out. I can see why this has the reviews it has lol. Why they let this be written by a writer who only has one well reviewed movie I’ll never understand. Zegler I thought could’ve played around with the role more but she was fine. The Dwarves you get used to. Gadot, well…she really tried lol.
 
Last edited:
Just got out. I can see why this has the reviews it has lol. Why they let this be primarily written by a writer who only has one well reviewed movie out of five I’ll never understand. Zegler I thought could’ve played around with the role more but she was fine. The Dwarves you get used to. Gadot, well…she really tried lol.
At least she got to showcase her abilities while playing the Hag, right? :o
 
I watched it. It was ok. Nothing special.
Rachel was perfectly good as Snow White.

Gal was ok as evil queen. She wasnt downright terrible but didn't elevate the material. Her worse bit was her big song...just the moves and the "dancing" were....lacked charisma, uniqueness, nerve, and talent as Ru would say. She needed to camp it up more. But I also question them keeping the evil queen such a one-note villain. They could've at least added something about why she is obsessed with her looks.

Disneys recent thing about downgrading the Princes is weird (Prince Eric was adopted) and Jonathan was practically Flynn Rider. They very easily could've kept him as the Prince since we hear mention of another kingdom. Giving him his own supporting cast was....useless as hell. There's like 5-6 of them and only 2 of them have lines but they try to create a subplot that just....is useless. Make him The Prince and those his guards...it makes more sense.
JOnathans people are made up of like 4 guys and a woman. One of the guys is in love with the woman and vice versa. The girl aint got no lines. But they get together in the end and it was stupid. They could've and should've had that role be the little girl that little Snow gives her crown to as a child and seeing how kind Snow White was back then leads her to joining the rebellion. That adds depth

The dwarves were fine apart from their creepy CGI renderings. Still a stupid move by Disney.

Shame they didnt do more with the creepy forest.

Maybe upon a rewatch (that likely wont be happening ANYTIME SOON so correct me if I missed it) this doesnt seem as mary sue-ish
Snow knowing everything about the guards could've been set up better. We should have met them pre-being part of The Queens army. Though that one guard was serving FACE in his close up...he was hot. I think he was a farmer beforehand?
 
I watched it. It was ok. Nothing special.
Rachel was perfectly good as Snow White.

Gal was ok as evil queen. She wasnt downright terrible but didn't elevate the material. Her worse bit was her big song...just the moves and the "dancing" were....lacked charisma, uniqueness, nerve, and talent as Ru would say. She needed to camp it up more. But I also question them keeping the evil queen such a one-note villain. They could've at least added something about why she is obsessed with her looks.

Disneys recent thing about downgrading the Princes is weird (Prince Eric was adopted) and Jonathan was practically Flynn Rider. They very easily could've kept him as the Prince since we hear mention of another kingdom. Giving him his own supporting cast was....useless as hell. There's like 5-6 of them and only 2 of them have lines but they try to create a subplot that just....is useless. Make him The Prince and those his guards...it makes more sense.
JOnathans people are made up of like 4 guys and a woman. One of the guys is in love with the woman and vice versa. The girl aint got no lines. But they get together in the end and it was stupid. They could've and should've had that role be the little girl that little Snow gives her crown to as a child and seeing how kind Snow White was back then leads her to joining the rebellion. That adds depth

The dwarves were fine apart from their creepy CGI renderings. Still a stupid move by Disney.

Shame they didnt do more with the creepy forest.

Maybe upon a rewatch (that likely wont be happening ANYTIME SOON so correct me if I missed it) this doesnt seem as mary sue-ish
Snow knowing everything about the guards could've been set up better. We should have met them pre-being part of The Queens army. Though that one guard was serving FACE in his close up...he was hot. I think he was a farmer beforehand?
The Prince in Snow White has a name! 👀
 
I'm confused, were the Seven Dwarfs always going to be in the movie along with the Seven Bandits? Because they meet and interact in the movie.

I'm just confused how this went from costing $210 million to $270 million. It makes no sense. The Dwarfs don't even look that good, and they barely do anything except sing, dance, and march along a little.

They remove the scene where they chase the Evil Witch in her hag form and she falls off a cliff to her death.
 
I'm confused, were the Seven Dwarfs always going to be in the movie along with the Seven Bandits? Because they meet and interact in the movie.

I'm just confused how this went from costing $210 million to $270 million. It makes no sense. The Dwarfs don't even look that good, and they barely do anything except sing, dance, and march along a little.

They remove the scene where they chase the Evil Witch in her hag form and she falls off a cliff to her death.
If I had to guess they originally filmed the 7 bandits as the 7 dwarves, got pushback, went back and retooled them as the 7 bandits while adding back in the 7 dwarves.

That would explain why the cost jumped so much.
 
Martin Klebba, who voices Grumpy, stated that the dwarves were always going to be in it and done with cgi.
 
Then I wonder what accounts for the film going over $60 million in budget. Because nothing about the movie looks especially expensive other than the CGI dwarves and critters, which don't even look all that good. They didn't shoot in a real castle or anything.
 
1742664785246.png
Now I have to succumb myself to watching all the different versions again to see which one I like the best
 
Yikes. Most of those are probably bottom of the barrel.

Mirror, Mirror *shudder*
 
Yeah, it still trips me out Tarsem Singh directed Mirrror, Mirror.


It's the guy who made this:



made this:

 
Yikes. Most of those are probably bottom of the barrel.

Mirror, Mirror *shudder*
You cant top Snow White being awoken by "true loves kiss" and it being a bear licking her before turning back into the prince lol
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,557
Messages
21,989,626
Members
45,783
Latest member
mariagrace999
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"