t: Good week ahead.
29 seconds in that video.
, who's the woman supposed to be that's speaking at the 1:57-1:58 mark saying the "Trust in your friend..." line (she's shown briefly, wearing a hood/cloak)??who's the woman supposed to be that's speaking at the 1:57-1:58 mark saying the "Trust in your friend..." line (she's shown briefly, wearing a hood/cloak)??
The budget is not only 100m.CGI looks absolutely incredible in those latest featurettes, even with the crappy Youtube quality.
Budget is only 100 M, this is going to make some serious bank overseas.
All we know is that it is over 100m. But considering the amount of sfx, yeah I don't think it is any less then 150m. I really do get a Pacific Rim vibe from this in that regard.I seriously doubt that the budget is only 100 million. Wouldn't surprise me if we find out that the budget is like 175 million.
All we know is that it is over 100m. But considering the amount of sfx, yeah I don't think it is any less then 150m. I really do get a Pacific Rim vibe from this in that regard.
I don't like to include marketing in budget. It is definitely a hefty expense, but no what we are talking about here. But yes, that is another cool 100m at least.And the marketing expenses.
I don't like to include marketing in budget. It is definitely a hefty expense, but no what we are talking about here. But yes, that is another cool 100m at least.
Depends on corporate sponsorship and such. Like a movie like Civil War or BvS has a lot of its marketing covered by those relationships. But I can't imagine Warcraft is making big bank off Hostess or Sears.Does marketing costs not come out of the box office profits?
Reading people's opinions on the film. Doesn't look like critics will like it (not a big surprise here). Visuals and production - the most praised thing (surprisingly, since trailers don't really impress with visuals). Compared to the best examples of recent, like DotPotA. The story seems to be confusing for those unfamiliar with the games. And cliched at times. Action is brutal and well-staged (good stuff!). Orcs are praised. Garona is criticized (if you didn't like her in the trailers, you won't like her in the film either). As well as other human actors. Some cringy dialogs here and there, stupid romance subplot...
t:What a tough to translate to film, IF the movie isn't well liked. I mean, there are dense movies and TV shows, like Game of Thrones, Lord of the Rings, but I wonder if Warcraft was a book series in an alt universe, if it would've been easier to adapt? Because with a game series, it just...sprawls...endlessly..sometimes with no endgame. And with no real main leads, it's tough to condense.
I wonder if Warcraft would've worked better as a series (as expensive as it would be)..I wonder if Starcraft would be easier to adapt?
Looking at the tweets, here is what I am getting. It is primitive, in that it is super cliched. The problem of confusion probably comes with the crap ton of names and words for things that probably aren't explained indepth. And well if you don't care, you start zoning out and things get confusing. Batman v. Superman isn't confusing. But it is so boring that people just lose track of what is going on because they don't care.I don't really understand how a primitive thing like Warcraft can be confusing... Also, about main leads. WC 1-3 had main leads.
Seems like the problem is that it doesn't differ from other stories.I think you can definitely put all important things from the WarCraft games into the film. This is about the beginning, the first time Orcs and Humans met and why. How does that differ from any other story?