SuperDaniel
Superhero
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2001
- Messages
- 9,782
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 56
He looks pretty big to me.
He is bigger than he was in the imortals his neck is thicker too. He will look good and so will his suit..... I hope.
That's not really an accurate way of gauging it, but let's just say that he'll have a nice athletic build. No, he won't look like Hemsworth or Evans or jackman...or even Routh...without some visual enhancement. But if he's good enough in the role, it may not matter as much, ultimately.another one...
![]()
...while he's not as big as a lot of people would want him to be, if he looks about as big as my projection then i'd say he's just about perfect. remember, he's just starting out so he doesn't have to be huge. there's plenty of time for Cavill to fill out for the sequels.
while he doesn't have the broad shoulders of Evans or Hemsworth, i think he's plenty big...
![]()
here's an Immortals pic for comparison.
![]()
...also keep in mind that this is him in his relaxed state. he hasn't done anything to pump up his muscles so that he looks as his maximum size.
edit: a lot of people were saying that they would be happy if Cavill got to the size that he looks like in my manip...
![]()
...looks like he's pretty close to me.
He better get a new trainer and nutritionist, and start putting on some serious muscle fast...or maybe they'll enhance him digitally in the movie. Then again, with his frame and proportions, more muscle might just make him look too stocky like it did with Bale.
No offense Kalmart but you keep posting the same **** about Cavill being not big enough. Is Clark suppose to look big in a shirt? Cavill has said he is 25lbs heavier than he was in Immortals. If you've seen that trailer then that is actually a lot of weight he has put on. Why do you keep judging him based on what he looks like in a loose shirt?
More like 'artistic license' in this case, actually. And I have plenty of sense and reference of physicality and athleticism to gauge from those pics...'talent' maybe another story, depending on who you aski didn't say it was accurate, but if you have artistic talent and solid knowledge of anatomy along with how clothes act (all of which i have) then i'd say it's a good guesstimate/projection. it's not supposed to represent EXACTLY how his build will look in the movie but more or less give you an idea of what it COULD look like using the resources that we've been given.
I'd actually disagree with the comparison to Evans (not sure about Hemsworth). Chris Evans, despite carrying lots of lean muscle, actually strikes me as not a very big guy (at least in the traditional wide shoulders, barrel chest sort of way eg. Arnold).
Hrmmm.... he is probably wider than Cavill, but he often appears "thin" to me (from front to back). Like in the the most common shirtless shot of Evans from Captain America. I think Cavill, even if proportionately smaller, will look bigger and more iconically Superman-esque because he has a bigger ribcage and just better overall structure.
I think he will also outdo Routh and (please don't kill me) Reeve in this regard -quite simply because he shorter. You don't find many 6'3 to 6'4 people who are actually as wide and thick as Superman is traditionally drawn. You can probably better pull off the illusion of both width and height using a shorter actor like Cavill.
no, ACTUALLY "artistic license" is taking Superman's belt and making it a "V" shape instead of straight or doing away with his trunks. artistic license is when you take something that is established and put your own spin on it. what i did was take the images from Comic-Con and provided an illustrated x-ray of his build based upon what i've observed on how clothing reacts to the human body. i took my best educated guess. please don't try to detract from my abilities.More like 'artistic license' in this case, actually.
that's fine and all and i'm not doubting you...but if so, please tell me how i've projected an inaccurate depiction of his build. tell me why his biceps can't be that big or why his chest wouldn't be that shape or size. if you're going to discredit my projections then you're going to have to do a lot more than just saying that i'm taking artistic license and throwing out that you have your own sense of anatomy. i normally don't like being so blunt but in this case....put up or shut up.And I have plenty of sense and reference of physicality and athleticism to gauge from those pics.
And imaginary bulging muscles, apparently.no, ACTUALLY "artistic license" is taking Superman's belt and making it a "V" shape instead of straight or doing away with his trunks. artistic license is when you take something that is established and put your own spin on it. what i did was take the images from Comic-Con and provided an illustrated x-ray of his build based upon what i've observed on how clothing reacts to the human body. i took my best educated guess. please don't try to detract from my abilities.
that's fine and all and i'm not doubting you...but if so, please tell me how i've projected an inaccurate depiction of his build. tell me why his biceps can't be that big or why his chest wouldn't be that shape or size. if you're going to discredit my projections then you're going to have to do a lot more than just saying that i'm taking artistic license and throwing out that you have your own sense of anatomy. i normally don't like being so blunt but in this case....put up or shut up.
now you're just being a d***...And imaginary bulging muscles, apparently.![]()
well when all you do is come back with empty arguments, then yeah...i don't have to worry about you discrediting my projections.Don't worry, your abilities are safe.![]()
because his sleeves would be more folded and loose than they are in those pictures if his biceps and triceps were any smaller. most business shirts are less than 1/8 of an inch thick so it's not as if it's a thick material that would add mass to the size of his arms. that's only PART of the reason why...Tell me why they can't NOT be as big as you're depicting...
yes...BECAUSE MY ENTIRE POST LOOKED LIKE THIS, INDICATING THAT I WAS YELLING AND LOSING CONTROL OF MY EMOTIONS WITHOUT PROVIDING LOGIC OR REASONING!!! ARRRGGGHHHFDFFLASDF!!! *ends sarcasm*and try chilling out. Then we can have a discussion.![]()
Maybe it just seems that way to a b@by.now you're just being a d***...
A bit sensitive about your 'abilities', no?well when all you do is come back with empty arguments, then yeah...i don't have to worry about you discrediting my projections.
But you can see how loose fitting it is in a lot of areas. There's no reason to think that it can't hang straight and not be against his skin at every square inch of the arms. Look at the pic of Evans and how that thin shirt is around his arms and shoulders.because his sleeves would be more folded and loose than they are in those pictures if his biceps and triceps were any smaller. most business shirts a less than 1/8 of an inch thick so it's not as if it's a thick material that would add mass to the size of his arms. that's only PART of the reason why...
Hate to break it to you, but you don't present much of a challenge....since you tried to divert attention and dodge my challenge, i STILL await your reason why he can't be as big as i depicted.
yes...BECAUSE MY ENTIRE POST LOOKED LIKE THIS, INDICATING THAT I WAS YELLING AND LOSING CONTROL OF MY EMOTIONS WITHOUT PROVIDING LOGIC OR REASONING!!! ARRRGGGHHHFDFFLASDF!!! *ends sarcasm*
I'll judge whether he's big enough for my taste or not once we've seen an ACTUAL PICTURE of him as SUPERMAN...
I mean, look here:
![]()
I'd say Evans looks bigger here than Hemsworth.
There is nothing remarkable about how he looks in normal clothes.
![]()
And he turned out fine
![]()
Maybe it just seems that way to a b@by.
sensitive?? not really...i'm confident in them. that's why you haven't discredited them despite your empty assaults.A bit sensitive about your 'abilities', no?
By the way, I never discredited them.
it's not really loose fitting around his shoulders and upper arm. it's not like Evans' boy-band type shirt that was CLEARLY meant to show off his physique because Cavill is wearing a BUSINESS shirt that was meant for HIDING his physique (he was there to talk promote Immortals, not Superman), however, if you look at the thickness of Cavill's upper arms at Comic-Con compared to his forearms there's quite a difference especially when you compare them to his arms from the Immortals picture where his upper arms are more proportionate with his forearms.But you can see how loose fitting it is in a lot of areas. There's no reason to think that it can't hang straight and not be against his skin at every square inch of the arms. Look at the pic of Evans and how that thin shirt is around his arms and shoulders.
yeah, that's why you keep replyingHate to break it to you, but you don't present much of a challenge.
no you just insinuated that i was taking 'artistic license' with human anatomy and clothing behaviorI never said it can't be the way you depicted...as in impossible...
boy you sure have got me figured out don't ya? well regardless of whether i'm chill or riled up, i play by the rules of the board and i'll continue to provide my views and insight regardless of who likes them or not. i'm not gonna "chill" just to have a discussion with you but if you want to keep going, then let's dance!You don't need caps to betray your hand. A for effort, though.![]()
![]()
oh okay, well i guess you're done.Seriously, enough though.
Priceless.is that how you handle being called out? by calling the other person a baby.......with an @, as if it's a cuss word?
sensitive?? not really...i'm confident in them. that's why you haven't discredited them despite your empty assaults.
it's not really loose fitting around his shoulders and upper arm. it's not like Evans' boy-band type shirt that was CLEARLY meant to show off his physique because Cavill is wearing a BUSINESS shirt that was meant for HIDING his physique (he was there to talk promote Immortals, not Superman), however, if you look at the thickness of Cavill's upper arms at Comic-Con compared to his forearms there's quite a difference especially when you compare them to his arms from the Immortals picture where his upper arms are more proportionate with his forearms.
yeah, that's why you keep replyingwhatever helps you sleep better tonight...
no you just insinuated that i was taking 'artistic license' with human anatomy and clothing behaviornice backpedaling btw...
boy you sure have got me figured out don't ya? well regardless of whether i'm chill or riled up, i play by the rules of the board and i'll continue to provide my views and insight regardless of who likes them or not. i'm not gonna "chill" just to have a discussion with you but if you want to keep going, then let's dance!
I'll judge whether he's big enough for my taste or not once we've seen an ACTUAL PICTURE of him as SUPERMAN...
I mean, look here:
![]()
I'd say Evans looks bigger here than Hemsworth.