Most disappointing movie of 2012? (so far)

Most disappointing film of 2012 (so far)

  • The Avengers

  • The Dark Knight Rises

  • The Amazing Spider-Man

  • Prometheus

  • Men in Black III

  • Total Recall

  • Bourne Legacy

  • Battleship

  • Dark Shadows

  • Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter

  • Snow White and the Huntsman

  • Ted

  • Brave

  • Moonrise Kingdom

  • The Hunger Games

  • Other (please mention)


Results are only viewable after voting.
i know i'm gonna take it in the neck for this but...
i though TDKR was dissapointing as a superhero movie...it was more like a thriller/action film...which someone dressed as batman was in..it didn't feel superheroishthe only gadget batman had was the gun thing in the beginning..and the bat which was conveniently stored away for ages..Banes voice i thought sounded really silly he sounded like patrick stewarts character in american dad!
i enjoyed the film but it was very long and not very rewatchable..the last batman movie was only great due to heath ledger's joker..who was awesome and mesmerizing!
and the whole bruce giving up being batman to sip wine in france is BULL..the bruce the comics know would never give up batman..he is batman and bruce wayne is the costume.
Again i did like the film..but the avengers trounces it in the superhero,exciting,rewatchable superhero movie stakes.
The next batman movie director/writer needs to talk to rocksteady's batman writers as those games nail the character.
 
A lot of people seem to hate TDK/TDKR because they're not the "true and true" CBMs, lol.

And AA/AC's writer was Paul Dini.
 
the bruce the comics know would never give up batman

Batman_-_Dark_Knight_Returns_1.jpg


Bruce is also a father in multiple arcs. Is that unholy to you as well?

On that note, I find it confusing you mention the Arkham games as a 'model' representative for the relaunch when the writing for the character was utterly superficial. Nothing was nailed (other than the fantasy aspects and Batman's detective skills).
 
I was disapointed with Expendables 2. I think I just set my expectations WAAY to high for it. It's not a terrible action movie by any means but I just expected more. 7.5/10
 
Every time I go see Expendables(counting the times I saw the first one and when I saw E2 last night), I only expect a late 80s/early 90s action fest and I am not disappointed, lol.
 
Batman_-_Dark_Knight_Returns_1.jpg


Bruce is also a father in multiple arcs. Is that unholy to you as well?

On that note, I find it confusing you mention the Arkham games as a 'model' representative for the relaunch when the writing for the character was utterly superficial. Nothing was nailed (other than the fantasy aspects and Batman's detective skills).

i never said i didn't like the film..i did enjoy it..it just didnt feel superhero-y.
and regardless to any fact batman IS a dc comics superhero alongside superman and flash etc..
the film seemed like a regular (yet good) film with batman stuck in it.
It also seemed slow..which was a criticism of the amazing spider-man too..took too long to get going..sam raimi's was much better.
i did like andrew garfield tho.
i do hope the man of steel next year doesnt lose the heart and soul of superman in its need to be too realistic or batman begins-y..
i understand new generation and all..but its not all doom and gloom..supes is the light in the darkness..and i do hope it shows in this movie..fingers crossed!
 
Keep in mind, Bane was excommunicated from The League for his 'radical' ways.

The League of Shadows wanted to KILL everybody in Gotham. How more "radical" than that can you get?
 
Out of what I have seen The Muppets was to a degree and Ghost Rider 2 was as well but considering all the hype and whatnot definitely The Dark Knight Rises... It wasn't a terrible film and to be honest, I enjoyed it in the cinema but in hindsight it just wasn't that great...

I agree that the Batman films haven't really felt very superhero-y, like Spider-Man does for example and that's not neccessarily a bad point but Whereas TDK was a good crime thriller film with an interesting villain and a couple good sequences TDKR is just.... boring.

- For a start it felt like the story was written with Joker in mind as the main villain but they had to shoehorn someone else in when Joker was no longer an option
- Everyone was comparing the opening plane sequence to the hotel hallway fight in Inception and it was nothing like it.
- Too much Bruce, not enough Batman.. Felt like half the film was spent in the brazillian prison (or wherever it was)
- Too much focus/time spent on Gordon and Blake in the over run Gotham.
- Banes voice was silly and pretty incomprehensible a couple times..
- the WHERE'S THE TRIGGER!? scene actually eclipses the WHERE IS SHE!? scene from TDK for ridiculousness
- Hathaway as Catwomen didn't realistically look like she was tough and could take down all them guys
- Batman wouldn't let Catwoman use a gun yet he gives her his Batpod with machine guns on the front
- The conveniently parked Bat down the alleyway but what happens to the Batpod?
- John Blake knows Bruce is Batman because he knows how he feels and knows a look?
- The Bane fight wasn't that great
- The Mayor got blown up yet no one seemed bothered
- What ever happened to Lucious in that flooded room?
- Wasn't it stated in the film that everyone from Arkham was transferred to Blackgate? Yet there is no mention of the Joker escaping. Ok, so you can't show him but they could have had a throw away line, "The last thing we need is the Joker running around"
- The Scarecrow cameo felt like it would have suited Joker better
- Bane was portrayed as the main villain throughout the film but at the end he's not really anything more than a henchman to Talia (even if Bane's ego said otherwise)
- Cheesy ending.. similar to Inception except instead of feeling a sense of "ARRRGHH" cos it cut away from the spinning top, you're groaning 'cos you know Batman is there..

And perhaps the biggest thing..

- Nolan and Bale have gone on record several times saying they don't like Robin and don't wanna use him yet he's there. Ok, not really technically by name but it basically is Robin. It's almost like WB forced Nolan to add him so he went "ok but I won't call him Robin".

It's a trilogy whose only high point is the performance of an actor no longer with us.
 
Last edited:
Keep in mind, Bane was excommunicated from The League for his 'radical' ways.

I saw this being quoted and I wanted to quote this as well, just to say that was a rumor with Bane being too "radical" for the League. We know the real reason that he was excommunicated because Bane reminded Ra's al Ghul too much of his dead wife, who was banished in the Pit. A reason why Talia soon left her father and couldn't forgive Ra's until his death.
 
the film seemed like a regular (yet good) film with batman stuck in it.

I don't see how simply because Nolan decided to focus on Bruce Wayne more.

The League of Shadows wanted to KILL everybody in Gotham. How more "radical" than that can you get?

Well, Ra's wasn't precisely a maniac who killed for the hell of it. He believed the actions he was taking were making the world a better place.
 
Out of what I have seen The Muppets was to a degree and Ghost Rider 2 was as well but considering all the hype and whatnot definitely The Dark Knight Rises... It wasn't a terrible film and to be honest, I enjoyed it in the cinema but in hindsight it just wasn't that great...

I agree that the Batman films haven't really felt very superhero-y, like Spider-Man does for example and that's not neccessarily a bad point but Whereas TDK was a good crime thriller film with an interesting villain and a couple good sequences TDKR is just.... boring.

- For a start it felt like the story was written with Joker in mind as the main villain but they had to shoehorn someone else in when Joker was no longer an option
- Everyone was comparing the opening plane sequence to the hotel hallway fight in Inception and it was nothing like it.
- Too much Bruce, not enough Batman.. Felt like half the film was spent in the brazillian prison (or wherever it was)
- Too much focus/time spent on Gordon and Blake in the over run Gotham.
- Banes voice was silly and pretty incomprehensible a couple times..
- the WHERE'S THE TRIGGER!? scene actually eclipses the WHERE IS SHE!? scene from TDK for ridiculousness
- Hathaway as Catwomen didn't realistically look like she was tough and could take down all them guys
- Batman wouldn't let Catwoman use a gun yet he gives her his Batpod with machine guns on the front
- The conveniently parked Bat down the alleyway but what happens to the Batpod?
- John Blake knows Bruce is Batman because he knows how he feels and knows a look?
- The Bane fight wasn't that great
- The Mayor got blown up yet no one seemed bothered
- What ever happened to Lucious in that flooded room?
- Wasn't it stated in the film that everyone from Arkham was transferred to Blackgate? Yet there is no mention of the Joker escaping. Ok, so you can't show him but they could have had a throw away line, "The last thing we need is the Joker running around"
- The Scarecrow cameo felt like it would have suited Joker better
- Bane was portrayed as the main villain throughout the film but at the end he's not really anything more than a henchman to Talia (even if Bane's ego said otherwise)
- Cheesy ending.. similar to Inception except instead of feeling a sense of "ARRRGHH" cos it cut away from the spinning top, you're groaning 'cos you know Batman is there..

And perhaps the biggest thing..

- Nolan and Bale have gone on record several times saying they don't like Robin and don't wanna use him yet he's there. Ok, not really technically by name but it basically is Robin. It's almost like WB forced Nolan to add him so he went "ok but I won't call him Robin".

It's a trilogy whose only high point is the performance of an actor no longer with us.

You were dissapointed by the muppets?
 
Total Recall - very disappointed at what could've been more of a thinking mans action movie but instead we get way to much pointless action and zero in the humor department.

Ghost Rider 2 - I knew it was trash from the start I just wanted to see Cage's over the top performace.

Amazing Spider-Man - not so disappointed just found it unnecessary to go over the origin by adding Peter's parents into some mystery that gets forgotten midway and won't get resolved until the sequels maybe.
 
Hathaway is a talented and versatale actress who did something with that role that not many actresses would have and with skill that probably made actresses around her age jealous. The movie itself failed her by not intigrating her character in the story enough but she came out looking way better than Marion and Hardy. The former was wasted in a nothing role that shouldn't have existed and the latter was failed by terrible ADR, one not being able to understand him 50% of the time and the poorly done plot twist. I think Bale JGL and Hataway came out smelling like roses but the rest of the cast? Nah.

Nope wrong; everyone was perfect.
 
Out of what I have seen The Muppets was to a degree and Ghost Rider 2 was as well but considering all the hype and whatnot definitely The Dark Knight Rises... It wasn't a terrible film and to be honest, I enjoyed it in the cinema but in hindsight it just wasn't that great...

I agree that the Batman films haven't really felt very superhero-y, like Spider-Man does for example and that's not neccessarily a bad point but Whereas TDK was a good crime thriller film with an interesting villain and a couple good sequences TDKR is just.... boring.

- For a start it felt like the story was written with Joker in mind as the main villain but they had to shoehorn someone else in when Joker was no longer an option
- Everyone was comparing the opening plane sequence to the hotel hallway fight in Inception and it was nothing like it.
- Too much Bruce, not enough Batman.. Felt like half the film was spent in the brazillian prison (or wherever it was)
- Too much focus/time spent on Gordon and Blake in the over run Gotham.
- Banes voice was silly and pretty incomprehensible a couple times..
- the WHERE'S THE TRIGGER!? scene actually eclipses the WHERE IS SHE!? scene from TDK for ridiculousness
- Hathaway as Catwomen didn't realistically look like she was tough and could take down all them guys
- Batman wouldn't let Catwoman use a gun yet he gives her his Batpod with machine guns on the front
- The conveniently parked Bat down the alleyway but what happens to the Batpod?
- John Blake knows Bruce is Batman because he knows how he feels and knows a look?
- The Bane fight wasn't that great
- The Mayor got blown up yet no one seemed bothered
- What ever happened to Lucious in that flooded room?
- Wasn't it stated in the film that everyone from Arkham was transferred to Blackgate? Yet there is no mention of the Joker escaping. Ok, so you can't show him but they could have had a throw away line, "The last thing we need is the Joker running around"
- The Scarecrow cameo felt like it would have suited Joker better
- Bane was portrayed as the main villain throughout the film but at the end he's not really anything more than a henchman to Talia (even if Bane's ego said otherwise)
- Cheesy ending.. similar to Inception except instead of feeling a sense of "ARRRGHH" cos it cut away from the spinning top, you're groaning 'cos you know Batman is there..

And perhaps the biggest thing..

- Nolan and Bale have gone on record several times saying they don't like Robin and don't wanna use him yet he's there. Ok, not really technically by name but it basically is Robin. It's almost like WB forced Nolan to add him so he went "ok but I won't call him Robin".

It's a trilogy whose only high point is the performance of an actor no longer with us.

No, no, no, no.

John Blake was NOT Robin. Not basically Robin. Not Robin at all. His name being Robin was just a nod to the fans. He will be the new Batman. The new vigilante of Gotham. Not a sidekick like Robin. Not a partner like Robin. This is why it was a big deal in the Wayne/Blake scenes that Batman needs to wear a mask because anyone can be him. A mask creates anonymity that will protect loved ones. Batman isn't just one man, but a symbol. This is what Bruce meant when he was talking to Alfred in the plane in Batman Begins.
 
The hunger games. The shaky cam and PG13 rating hurt this film.

I'd have been disappointed by The Hunger Games had I not expected so little from it. Just a bland, uninteresting, emotionless movie.
 
So this thread is essentially people who didn't like TDKR venting?
 
I still don't get the whining about Bane's voice. I understood everything he said in the film. Literally, everything. And if that's the result of some tweaking in the studio, then fine. He still sounded powerful and menacing to me.

What's so strange is I've seen people complain that they didn't understand anything he said, and then I've seen people complain that they COULD understand everything he said. I don't know, the hell with it... people were never going to like it as much as they liked TDK no matter what Nolan did. So you know what? If all of these miniscule things ruined the movie for you, I say GOOD. I'm glad you had to sit in a theater for 2+ hours, miserable and feeling like somebody just vomited in your Corn Flakes.
 
I understood everything Bane said, I just hated the stupid voice he used to deliver those lines.

I was on the verge of laughter when he said "OF COURSE" during the prologue.

When he proclaimed "I AM THE LEAGUE OF SHADOWS!" I felt like facepalming. That line was supposed to be intimidating? I found it to be complete cheese.
 
- For a start it felt like the story was written with Joker in mind as the main villain but they had to shoehorn someone else in when Joker was no longer an option

Where do you get that? If anything, Crane was then one who replaced Joker.

- Everyone was comparing the opening plane sequence to the hotel hallway fight in Inception and it was nothing like it.

So? How is that a negative? It was its own sequence.

- Too much Bruce, not enough Batman.. Felt like half the film was spent in the brazillian prison (or wherever it was)

Felt like it, but it was only like 6 minutes in total. Just like the Joker felt like the protagonist of TDK, when in reality he had very limited screentime.

- Too much focus/time spent on Gordon and Blake in the over run Gotham.

Too little, I have to say.

- Banes voice was silly and pretty incomprehensible a couple times..

Disagree on the former (save for 2 instances), agree on the latter.

- the WHERE'S THE TRIGGER!? scene actually eclipses the WHERE IS SHE!? scene from TDK for ridiculousness

I will never defend that line to those who find it laughable, I totally get them and you. But for some odd reason, I worship it.

- Hathaway as Catwomen didn't realistically look like she was tough and could take down all them guys

Disagree.

- Batman wouldn't let Catwoman use a gun yet he gives her his Batpod with machine guns on the front

Batman wouldn't let her kill. He gave her the pod to blow up the cars, not people. Hence her line after killing Bane. Now, had you complained about Bruce ending up with her knowing she's a killer...

- The conveniently parked Bat down the alleyway but what happens to the Batpod?

Integrated into the Bat? Does it really hurt the movie that much for you?

- John Blake knows Bruce is Batman because he knows how he feels and knows a look?

I can't argue that one yet. Still can't decide if there's deeper meaning behind it or if it's Nolan getting too lazy and wanting to get it out of the way to focus on their relationship.

- The Bane fight wasn't that great

Matter of opinion, I think it was one of the best fight sequences ever. And that speaks volumes for a director who was getting tons of heat for his lackluster and fake direction of fight scenes.

- The Mayor got blown up yet no one seemed bothered

What about all the people in the stadium screaming?

- What ever happened to Lucious in that flooded room?

He got away.

- Wasn't it stated in the film that everyone from Arkham was transferred to Blackgate? Yet there is no mention of the Joker escaping. Ok, so you can't show him but they could have had a throw away line, "The last thing we need is the Joker running around"

Nolan explained why the Joker isn't mentioned. I don't necessarily agree, but there you go. If it helps you, in the novelization Catwoman thinks to herself that the Joker is nowhere to be found. Looks like he got a mysterious ending, just like his beginning for this universe. Fitting, no?

- The Scarecrow cameo felt like it would have suited Joker better

Exactly. Hence why the script wasn't written with the Joker in mind.

- Bane was portrayed as the main villain throughout the film but at the end he's not really anything more than a henchman to Talia (even if Bane's ego said otherwise)

No evidence at all. Seemed like a co-leadership to me and a deep, deep love and respect to each other. I don't get people who say he was a henchman. Vader was a henchman and Sidious never bothered to fix his hand or help him after Luke owned him in RotJ. People give Nolan crap for his lack of subtlety but when he does the subtle thing and has Talia fix Bane's mask while doing the plot exposition people don't get it. Maybe THE most powerful moment of the film, those silent shots between them.

- Cheesy ending.. similar to Inception except instead of feeling a sense of "ARRRGHH" cos it cut away from the spinning top, you're groaning 'cos you know Batman is there..

And that's cheesy how..? So you groaned 'cause the hero lived? And if it hadn't been answered you would've gone "ARGH". So there's no pleashing you.
600full-austin-powers-in-goldmember-screenshot_normal.jpg


- Nolan and Bale have gone on record several times saying they don't like Robin and don't wanna use him yet he's there. Ok, not really technically by name but it basically is Robin. It's almost like WB forced Nolan to add him so he went "ok but I won't call him Robin".

And yet he did call him Robin. Even JGL spelled out the ending for everyone. Blake is the symbol of what this trilogy has been trying to say, not the sidekick version of Robin. We don't know if he'll one day don a mask and if he will, whether he'll be called Robin, Nightwing, Batman, Captain Blake, Oracle or whatever. He's Gotham's everyman and proof that everyone can be A hero (not a particular hero).

And that's pretty much it.
 
And that's pretty much it.


Yeah I agree with that too except the ending. It's pretty clear Blake will become
Batman. The name Robin was a simple nod to the fans. JGL basically said this in his interview with Jimmy Kimmel.
 
The hunger games. The shaky cam and PG13 rating hurt this film.

I long for a version of that film that isn't so vanilla, this is why Hollywood needs a new ratings system, that story demanded more brutality to truly hit the mark and leave an impact on people.
 
Yeah I agree with that too except the ending. It's pretty clear Blake will become
Batman. The name Robin was a simple nod to the fans. JGL basically said this in his interview with Jimmy Kimmel.

He didn't specifically say [BLACKOUT]Batman[/BLACKOUT]. I strongly believe he's meant to become a [BLACKOUT]Batman-like figure, someone with his own identity[/BLACKOUT].
 
i know i'm gonna take it in the neck for this but...
i though TDKR was dissapointing as a superhero movie...it was more like a thriller/action film...which someone dressed as batman was in..it didn't feel superheroishthe only gadget batman had was the gun thing in the beginning..and the bat which was conveniently stored away for ages..Banes voice i thought sounded really silly he sounded like patrick stewarts character in american dad!
i enjoyed the film but it was very long and not very rewatchable..the last batman movie was only great due to heath ledger's joker..who was awesome and mesmerizing!
and the whole bruce giving up being batman to sip wine in france is BULL..the bruce the comics know would never give up batman..he is batman and bruce wayne is the costume.
Again i did like the film..but the avengers trounces it in the superhero,exciting,rewatchable superhero movie stakes.
The next batman movie director/writer needs to talk to rocksteady's batman writers as those games nail the character.

That's laughable. You clearly don't know much about Batman and yet, you say it's not like in the comics. Batman is way more complex than the cliche "Bruce is the mask, Batman is the real identity". Also, He did retire in the comics, not only in The Dark Knight Returns, but also on earth two, pre crisis. So yeah, two of the batman from the comics at least would retire. There isn't ONE Batman, there isn't ONE interpretation of the mythos. People thinking otherwise, or refusing to aknowledge this fact should read more comics obviously.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,277
Messages
22,078,850
Members
45,878
Latest member
Remembrance1988
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"