BvS New Positivity Thread (READ THE FIRST POST!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
if it really is as all these people say, an issue of 'writing' 'directing' and 'editing' then snyder being on board as producer on these other solo's shouldn't be much of a problem on the final result.
It people simply don't like the ideas and 'the darker' tone, whose to say what will happen.

I for one think snyder will finish out his trilogy of films, with terio(we supposedly trust lol), already explaining that he's probably done after jla1. And I'm hoping George miller finally get's his JLA film with all that has been set up. He is WB and Genre's darling right now. And he is already on board as a producer. Seems like the gears are already in motion tbh.
I don't mind Snyder being in the producers chair. It's just my concern regarding JL's chances with critics. As much as I like BvS, and it doing ok at the BO at the moment, I know even fans deep down gotta admit that if the critics reception was better, the BO could've been much better. I just don't want a repeat with JL, or worse, because now critics, if they weren't based before, are gonna totally rip him apart and not even give him a chance.
 
Just saw the movie for the 4th time. Honest to God I think its a complete Masterpiece.
 
It's also worth noting (and this was my logic when I reopened this thread) that folks are free to go into the box office thread, defend their opinions, etc. Fans of the movie complained about the mean old haters coming into the positivity thread and disagreeing with them. Thus, this thread was made to only allow nice things to be said. It's not meant to be a safe haven where you can complain about the opinions of other without those people being able to defend themselves. In other words, if you don't like what people are saying in the box office thread, go there and debate them. People who disagree with what is being said in this thread do not have that option. Therefore a higher degree of civility is required. In essence, it's a trade off for having a thread where no one can contradict you.
This is true, too. :up:
 
Just saw the movie for the 4th time. Honest to God I think its a complete Masterpiece.

MoS will still be my masterpiece movie, but BvS is growing closer with every viewing. I think the 3 hour version will ice it.
 
MoS will still be my masterpiece movie, but BvS is growing closer with every viewing. I think the 3 hour version will ice it.


MOS was an 8/10 for me, something I think an extended cut could have brought to a 10/10

So I'm very curious to see the extended cut of BVS. I typically like extended cuts more than theatrical cuts, but I already love this one so much. Have yet to find one flaw with this movie.
 
Yep, they are. They are fantastic and hardworking people who bust their asses and do a service for this site with no pay and no compensation. The only thing they get for maintaining the board and ensuring that it is one of the best message boards on the internet is complaints. But they do it anyway. That is indeed something else.
it's more along the lines of over sensitive and ban-happy. Hardworking maybe. Working hard to act like power hungry dictators.
 
MOS was an 8/10 for me, something I think an extended cut could have brought to a 10/10

So I'm very curious to see the extended cut of BVS. I typically like extended cuts more than theatrical cuts, but I already love this one so much. Have yet to find one flaw with this movie.
Seriously.

I can find a few but none of them are movie breaking. I am not understanding the problems people have with it.
 
It's also worth noting (and this was my logic when I reopened this thread) that folks are free to go into the box office thread, defend their opinions, etc. Fans of the movie complained about the mean old haters coming into the positivity thread and disagreeing with them. Thus, this thread was made to only allow nice things to be said. It's not meant to be a safe haven where you can complain about the opinions of other without those people being able to defend themselves. In other words, if you don't like what people are saying in the box office thread, go there and debate them. People who disagree with what is being said in this thread do not have that option. Therefore a higher degree of civility is required. In essence, it's a trade off for having a thread where no one can contradict you.

Pump the brake pedal, bud. I recall the reason this thread was made was because somebody didn't like the fact we were making remarks like "I came in here to escape the negativity of that 'other' thread," and so on.
 
Superhero Feed conducted a poll with over 20,000 votes so far on Twitter.

38% loved it
45% enjoyed it
12% disliked it
5% hated it
 
Superhero Feed conducted a poll with over 20,000 votes so far on Twitter.

38% loved it
45% enjoyed it
12% disliked it
5% hated it

That's 83% positive! Awesome news! The audience really has spoken this time.
 
It's also worth noting (and this was my logic when I reopened this thread) that folks are free to go into the box office thread, defend their opinions, etc. Fans of the movie complained about the mean old haters coming into the positivity thread and disagreeing with them. Thus, this thread was made to only allow nice things to be said. It's not meant to be a safe haven where you can complain about the opinions of other without those people being able to defend themselves. In other words, if you don't like what people are saying in the box office thread, go there and debate them. People who disagree with what is being said in this thread do not have that option. Therefore a higher degree of civility is required. In essence, it's a trade off for having a thread where no one can contradict you.
Why do I sense a tone of condescension in that statement?

The original purpose of the positivity thread was for fans to come here and discuss the movie without the vitriol from detractors interrupting a legit conversation about the movie with 5 negative posts between replies that does not contribute to anything aside from dumping on the movie. The thread was suppose to allow constructive criticism, and not ONLY to say nice things about the film. Fans can point out things that they liked, or didn't like, in a civilized manner. I remember in the original thread some people who didn't like the film even came in to discuss the parts they liked. That is totally fine. The thread started getting a little sidetracked when the hate against the film was so strong during release on the other threads, that fans started coming in here just to state their appreciation of this thread, and we can all see how that can turn into badmouthing the detractors.

I totally understand the reason the old thread was closed, and the new one is made to continue the conversation without badmouthing detractors. But don't make it sound like we're all brainwashed for having a positive opinion on the film, or that we believe the film has no flaws. I made the original thread and even I agree there are plenty flaws in the film, and stated some of them in here, even though it did not detract from my overall enjoyment.

I know some might feel the mods might have a double standard, since we're not allowed to comment on detractors in this thread, which I agree with the mods on. There are the other threads which we can defend the movie and debate with detractors like the BO, All things, or What Went Wrong thread. But realistically, there are probably more detractors of the film than fans at this board, so I can see why fans might feel overwhelmed by the arguments from the very loud naysayers. And I don't blame them. While we can't comment on the detractors, I see a few comments in the BO thread calling the posters in this thread delusional for having an opinion (that this film is good). While we can't and shouldn't badmouth them in here, I do hope Mods would feel the same in other threads. If they want to debate, take it up with the posters who post in those threads. I do know a few posters who still post in BO thread to give their take on the numbers and debate. That's totally fine. But don't smack talk and call posters in here delusional for liking a film they want to dump at while we're in here. I think that's fair.

Perhaps the usefulness of this thread has decreased, since I see other threads like the one made by LamboMan which discusses a major theme, and that was what I intended this thread to be originally, to discuss flaws, themes, hidden meanings, and various things without having the same few detractor posters just posting to dump on the movie. I guess this thread could still be a place to talk about general themes, constructive criticism (without the hate please), and things we like and want more of, etc. I would suggest posters keep the comments of detractors in other threads to a minimum. You can still show appreciation for this thread without talking too much about all the detractors. The key thing is to keep it clean in there.
 
Lex to Finch: "Yes! The chair of the committee on Superman is soft on security."
 
The mis-conception about the positivity thread is that we wanted to discuss the movie with everyone that agrees with us. No, we wanted to discuss the film without the air of negativity surrounding the forum. Like people making comments that are antaganostic or simply saying Snyder out. I think it's only fair some of us don't want to be surrounded by that. The first post in the thread from Matt was very condescending aswell yet that's ok right?
 
I know i've come in here and said slightly negative stuff mixed in with the positive. But because i'm saying it in a positive way, it's never been a problem.

It would suck if I came in here and couldn't be honest. But that's not the case.
 
Superhero Feed conducted a poll with over 20,000 votes so far on Twitter.

38% loved it
45% enjoyed it
12% disliked it
5% hated it

That's pretty much what my poll of 10 people I know who saw it came up with :yay:
 
Saw on Batman-News:

"What bothers me isn't the negative reviews, but how they amplified the negatives within the film. BvS is flawed, but it's not crap, or horrible. Most reviews have been vindictive in nature, rather than playing on both the positive and negatives, it was just another, "which critic can top the other with nasty reviews." I know some people will disagree with me, and state how they brought up valid points, but I disagree. There is valid points, but they're not that big, and most of the reviews nitpick the hell out of it. This movie didn't deserve the negative beating it receive."
 
I'm glad so many of you guys enjoyed this (*thumbs up emoji*) don't forget to let Snyder and Co know via social media

Edit: Nevermind. I'll just ignore this. This isn't the thread for this.
 
Last edited:
We have been regularly infracting people on both sides of the argument since the movie opened. I posted a warning against people making assumptions about why people are posting positive things about the movie in another thread just a few hours ago, and I know there was another clean-up of off-topic and offending posts in the Box Office thread earlier today. We're doing our best, is all I can say. There's just a lot of this stuff to wade through.


I don't envy you on this. :oldrazz:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,317
Messages
22,084,758
Members
45,883
Latest member
marvel2099fan89
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"