KillerMcQueen
Superhero
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2013
- Messages
- 8,509
- Reaction score
- 2,170
- Points
- 103
No it definitely needs 2 films. Even GDT understood that. Hobbit's page count is deceptively small. Tolkien used a lot of paraphrasing and summarising to condense a large story into a small page count that children could easily digest. But any film adaption has to unravel and expand Tolkien's compact summarizing and paraphrasing in the Hobbit book. And the book has very little characterization besides Bilbo which is another thing an adaption has to expand.
To fit it all into one film it would take some large sacrifices in either characterization or scenes and set pieces from the book. And Im not convinced too little is any better than too much.
Two 120-150 minute films was always the best option.
Not to mention, the LOTR films aren't the best example of a film fitting all of the books content into three films, they did a spectacular job, don't get me wrong, and I love them, but they had to cut a huge amount of content from the books to even fit them into three three hour films. I do think it'd be cool to see a two film cut of The Hobbit.
Last edited: