I agree.... too much cussing in the non violent scenes. What I am getting at is that the NEW film isn't going to be as neutered as everyone makes it sound because pg-13 films are much closer to R then they used to be.
Agreed. Even normal cable TV has become increasing more violent. Look at shows like CSI. 20 years ago you would never see a TV show on basic cable with such violent images.
I've become a fan of the TV series Hannibal and for a basic cable show, wow it's quite gruesome and shocking.
This RoboCop will not be as violent and shocking as the original. We all know that, but I don't think Padilha is going to hold back a certain level of violence. He seems like a very capable, smart filmmaker. He seems to put the story and characters above anything else, unlike Len Wiseman and his whole key production team who put the action before the story and characters in last year's lame Total Recall.
We have to remember that a big reason Total Recall was critically panned wasn't because of it's PG-13 rating; it was because of it's unoriginal rehashed story that came off dry and boring and characters that were so dull and underwritten. Had that film's material been approached in a completely different way with a better script and a much more talented filmmaker directing it, then that film very well could have turned out great with a PG-13 rating attached. At least with RoboCop, the filmmakers are clearly approaching the material with new spins and ideas.
Also, we have to remember that the studio budgeted this film at $100 million. The studio wants to do whatever they have to do to make it's money back plus some more. Even if Padilha wants a more violent film, the studio in the end has control over this film and wants to make it's money back. I'm willing to bet if this new RoboCop was budgeted around $50 million, we could very well being seeing a new R rated RoboCop.