Silver Lantern
comic nerd
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2004
- Messages
- 607
- Reaction score
- 17
- Points
- 13
This would be a good one to use
Last edited:
I just want a less armored look to be honest.
Why can't you have an armored lining explained in the movie to show he gets extra protection without looking like an armored suit?
Nolan's Batman was shot at the end of TDK, so it was probably best that he had the armor.
I'd like to see Snyder's Batman mix it up. I don't know that he needs to commit to just one suit.
That's a very good point. Maybe something a little lighter than the Arkham suit(s) material?
The problem with fabric in live action is two-fold. One, it looks dumb in live action. Two, Batman is constantly dealing with gunfire, knives, explosives, etc. Him wearing armor makes SO MUCH more sense for a man as practical as him. He would wear armor, it's common sense.
Since Nolan was trying to be more realistic, I am really surprised that he did not go for a more fabric-like armor grey-and-black suit. The suit from the comics is technically more realistic than any of the suits in the movies for two reasons:
1) It doesn't wear Batman down and makes his body more light. Armor restricts a lot of his movements and makes him move at a slower pace.
2) It has been scientifically proven that black on grey and black on blue are the best colors for camouflaging in the dark, which is what Batman specializes in.
Batman had protection from bullets and knives in the comics too. He wears very lightweight fabric armor that still protects the body from bullets to an extent while still not making him heavier and letting him be agile.