Bathead
The Oldest Geek
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2004
- Messages
- 6,209
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
...what exactly are you implying that none of this is real?![]()
Heresy!!!
...what exactly are you implying that none of this is real?![]()
I agree completely. I don't get it either. Both characters are fictional. You'd think Superman's powers are the universal laws of physics the way people talk.
I don't think people realize how ridiculous they sound when they say "In reality Superman would squash Batman in seconds, armor or not!".
Hello? This is not reality. This is fiction and both characters are subject to whatever your imagination can come up with. Superman can be depowered or handicapped, Batman can be given a infinite amount of things to even the fight, etc.
Stop limiting your imagination, people. None of this is real, so talking about how unrealistic it is for Batman to fight Superman is silly in the first place. I love TDKR because Miller actually had the nerve to make a story where Batman beats Superman. If he limited his imagination like so many people who claim Batman wouldn't last a second against Superman, we'd miss out on one of the most monumental Batman stories ever told.
I agree completely. I don't get it either. Both characters are fictional. You'd think Superman's powers are the universal laws of physics the way people talk.
I don't think people realize how ridiculous they sound when they say "In reality Superman would squash Batman in seconds, armor or not!".
Hello? This is not reality. This is fiction and both characters are subject to whatever your imagination can come up with. Superman can be depowered or handicapped, Batman can be given a infinite amount of things to even the fight, etc.
Stop limiting your imagination, people. None of this is real, so talking about how unrealistic it is for Batman to fight Superman is silly in the first place. I love TDKR because Miller actually had the nerve to make a story where Batman beats Superman. If he limited his imagination like so many people who claim Batman wouldn't last a second against Superman, we'd miss out on one of the most monumental Batman stories ever told.
MrsKent, remember, Batman is in Supermans world, not the other way around. We don't have any Nolanism imbedded in this universe that we know of. The realism is still being translated and balanced as we go along. We will know soon enough how this armored suit turns out. Who knows what Wayne Enterprise technology is capable of in this universe?
As far as I'm concerned it's like this:
Due to the extreme disparity of physical power, supes will have to be depowered either way (slightly less so with the suit). So, batman can either fight a depowered supes looking (and moving) like batman, creature of the night, or he can fight a depowered supes in what I think is an ugly, bulky suit. Why not go that extra bit and depower supes to the point that batman can fight him without the suit? The rules of Kryptonite (or whatever they use) are variable enough to allow for that.
Perhaps I'll still get what I want at some point, but I'm aware that I'll probably just have to accept the suit and hope that it grows on me after seeing the final product.
Where's this picture from? Haven't seen it before. Anyone know?
![]()
Yeah, I would far prefer the first option.
It's been raised many times, but it could be interesting if they didn't use kryptonite, but the Krypton atmosphere angle from MoS. That way Superman would be depowered but not completely weakened and in pain. Any armour Batman had would really count for something, and even though Batman is going to be the better martial artist every day of the week, they could explore Superman's heroism against the odds. His quick thinking and improvisation. An interesting reverse of the dynamic where Batman is usually the one biding his time, looking to use tricks.