KillerWolf
Possibly partially drunk
- Joined
- May 13, 2014
- Messages
- 18,661
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Eyes are not the only means of conveying emotion. You've got the entire lower half of your face and body language left to work with.
Hugo Weaving and Jackie Earle Haley had their entire faces covered, yet I had no issue with reading any given emotion they were trying to evoke in 'V for Vendetta' and 'Watchmen, respectively. Any hindrances provided by practical limitations should be overcome by a good actor.
Exactamundo.
And as a stoic character, Batman is not supposed to be very expressive anyway. Also cowl opening that leaves lower face exposed would be enough for all emotions he'd need to convey when under the cowl.
I guess this is the new "grey suit" argument. Until they actually see it, people will continue to claim that it wouldn't work in live action.
[/B]
Not to be argumentative, but I believe that the "Mech" suit was indeed built in full.. And will be used for some fight scenes.
Including the glowing white eyes.
All real.. All built by Ironhead Studios along with the normal "Bat-suit".
No doubt, CGI versions of suits will see screen time by WETA Digital?
But it won't be all CGI..
"Do you bleed?" That was Ben.. In the "Mech" suit..
It was built in full for sure, we saw it in SDCC, and it could be that we'll see that same suit on stand in the film, but it will be completely CGI in the film when Affleck wears it. Affleck confirmed so in the "Total Film" interview, saying that he wore one of those motion-capture pajama-like suits.

t: wow! I found this pic in the patokali facebook, I think is official, the batsuit looks great!

We might have different views on certain little things, but at the end of the day we all love the white eyes and want to see them in a movie. If done right, of course. And with Snyder and Wilkinson, how can it go wrong ?
