BvS The Batsuit Thread - Part 7

Status
Not open for further replies.
They are not coming back. You heard it here first, folks! :awesome:
 
So we all set sail tonight, right? :cwink:
I would pretty much have to be guaranteed to have sex so great, that life would honestly not be worth living anymore.

If all they do is lie there lazily while I work my 8 seconds of magic, only to have my neck snapped right after, I'd be pretty pissed off :o.
 
"Times are changing?" From what, and hasn't time always "changed" since it fused with space in the early days of our universe? Perhaps you mean that there is something particular about the dawning era that makes external trunks inappropriate? Is it America's decline as a superpower, the displacement of traditional opinion forming by social media, or perhaps the Arab spring?

The sure footed command of complex probability models and sociological analysis in this thread is dizzying.
 
Nobody said they are inappropriate. I think, didn't read much of the previous pages. Anyway, the trunks are gone because times change and trunks are no longer cool or make sense in this version of Superman. Or Batman.
 
Oh Christ. I give up.

I just want classic superhero costumes that aren't ashamed of what they are - costumes. If that makes me a dinosaur, then so be it.

I'm tired of artists trying to apologize for these characters and make them cooler by throwing a bunch of seams at them. Nevermind that they have stood the test of time for over eight decades and have become deeply embedded in American pop culture - all while wearing those silly trunks that everybody seems to hate so much.
 
They're gone because the people in power don't like them. Simple as that. It really has nothing to do with "times changing."
 
Oh Christ. I give up.

I just want classic superhero costumes that aren't ashamed of what they are - costumes. If that makes me a dinosaur, then so be it.

I'm tired of artists trying to apologize for these characters and make them cooler by throwing a bunch of seams at them.

I get that, but they would have to make a different kind of movie. This is dark and gritty and grounded and all those other words that are popular with comic book movies these days. Sorry.
 
It's funny. Back in Superman returns days I was a defender of trunks. I really felt they should stick closely to the comics. Oh those days. Brandon Routh got so much ****. Couldn't help but to root for him since he was the underdog. Anyway, the trunks just don't sit well with movies these days.
 
I don't know if this has been discussed, but do you guys think the new Bat suit should have trunks? Or what about white eyes? We need an official picture...and fast.
 
It's funny. Back in Superman returns days I was a defender of trunks. I really felt they should stick closely to the comics. Oh those days. Brandon Routh got so much ****. Couldn't help but to root for him since he was the underdog. Anyway, the trunks just don't sit well with movies these days.

To be fair though the SR suit was awful on so many levels.
 
i heard kevin smith was a big adam west fan. and the batfleck suit is the adam west costume. makes the most sense.
 
i heard kevin smith was a big adam west fan. and the batfleck suit is the adam west costume. makes the most sense.

1069887_606238792741950_1534369985_n.jpg


:awesome:
 
I don't really care about trunks one way or the other but if they did put in trunks and the movie was awesome the general public wouldn't give a damn that they were there.
 
Only thing I will say about the Bats suit is Supes has no trunks then neither should Batman.
 
Why am I just only now realizing that Freeze and Penguin played brothers?

And if those rumors of Eddie Murphy being Riddler for Nolan were true...
 
Only thing I will say about the Bats suit is Supes has no trunks then neither should Batman.

Again, that's faulty logic. Y'all can repeat that statement as many times as you want, it still makes no more sense than the first time.
 
I think it's more of if Superman isn't allowed to have trunks, it's highly unlikely Batman would.
 
I don't really care about trunks one way or the other but if they did put in trunks and the movie was awesome the general public wouldn't give a damn that they were there.

Exactly, which is why the contention that the GA would laugh at the trunks is ridiculous. The majority of them won't care one way or the other. The only ones arguing about it is us geeks.
 
Exactly, which is why the contention that the GA would laugh at the trunks is ridiculous. The majority of them won't care one way or the other. The only ones arguing about it is us geeks.

Well think of that statement form the perspective of the producers. It's a relative risk scenario here. So if either way the GA won't care but there is a stigma to batman in trunks or at least a potential to it, so better play it on the safe side and not include them.

From the prospective of the producers there is a greater risk to benefit ratio to including the trunks then not. Especially with all the backlash towards Ben why risk anything you don't have to?

I'm sure that same thought process was went through on MoS as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"