Why would they write it in a way that didn't make sense? I don't think they would want to do that. I think they would want to write it in a way that it did make sense!But what if they didn't?
See I can do that too!
Dk knows everything about this film, it's not worth having a different opinion.
You mean when they met in a completely different comic written by completely different writers? They didn't meet in their comics they met in All Star Comics #7 as honorary members of the JSA.
No both are true. Your reason is why it was made, Nolan suggested Snyder after a bunch of directors said no.
Are you knew here? Have you seen some of the crap that gets put out there? Just because they want it to make sense doesn't mean it will.
Wolverine looks like he slipped on the rocks
It's such a dumb point of you to make dude. You can say that for anything. "What if they wrote a crossover between Nolanverse Batman and the MCU and they made it make sense?". The point is 999 out of 1000 times it wouldn't and also it'd be a gigantic, and I mean gigantic headache to write or figure out because of the reasons we've pointed out.
I mean yes, but it's not like Nolan went straight for Snyder, they circled through everyone else before they got to him. And if the reason everyone else turned them down was because of things not in Nolan's control, ie complicated copyright law, backlog of Hollywood accounting causing a rush to make the movie which causes an inflexibility in the script. That has way more to do with Snyder getting the job than Nolan.
This one is easy to make sense of. Doctor Strange uses his magic to make the big circle to travel to different universes and one of those universes is the Nolanverse. Give me a real challenge.
That I don't disagree with. Personally I hope Gunn's Batman doesn't show up for a while for that exact reason.
All I said was Nolan was the reason. If Nolan doesn't suggest him (because no one else wanted the job) he never directs it.
The script was fine, it is what is left out by the director that made that film a mess. (in reality it is equally both)
The thing is that Matt takes so long between films that actually gives them a very very easy way to circumvent that in a way that'd also just flatly benefit the studio. It's gonna be 4.5 years between 1 and 2. It might even be longer between 2 and 3 since third films are the most complicated to write. So 2031 or maybe even 2032 for the third film. That gives them plenty of space in-between in which to put the DCU Batman movie out. I think it can work out fine. The only thing it does is that it adds extra pressure on BaTB to really knock it out of the park but I think they should have that pressure anyway.
The BVS script is still soooo Goyer. Lois Lane investigating the magic bullet and The White Portuguese are the most Goyer things I've ever seen.All I said was Nolan was the reason. If Nolan doesn't suggest him (because no one else wanted the job) he never directs it.
And it is funny that Goyer's script still gets blamed by some...cause when they replaced him with a supposedly better writer for BvS that worked out so well.
"Gritty and realistic" yet also has Batman's suit tank explosions and guns like he's Iron Man, gave him a car that spouts blue flames like a cartoon, and has Riddle flooding the city while giving a goofy OTT speech all while living in a Gotham that's just as stylized as a comic book.
Yeah because it's still a movie at the end of the day. Daniel Craig's Bond was also highly unrealistic if you try to really nail down the specifics but that doesn't mean it'd suddenly be a natural transition if he were to crossover with Thor. It also doesn't deny Reeves explicit intentions that he's mentioned over and over and over and over again but which fans seem to always ignore whenever it's convenient for their fan theories.
We will continue this argument in the Batman threads at a later date. You won’t see the two older Spidermen again to answer your question.
