No it isn't. It isn't that they don't work together it's that the universes don't match at all. The gymnastics needed to explain it would be terrible.
Them duking it out to Seether and Slipknot!
No. MCU IT!
It's even worse than that because they'd both be at each other constraints. For both parties it's a horrible idea. No one would benefit from it.
I don’t think Pattinson will ever cross over with Corenswet Superman, but I think they could because it is fiction and they could write it that way.
So recast Battinson and do a loose reboot of his Batman with a similar suit?
The problem is that the writing in question would more likely than not be bad.
But what if they write it good?
That is completely dependent on who wrote it.
Gunn is going to write the whole thing I'm sure.
He better have plenty of snacks on hand. It's going to be a long write.Gunn is going to write the whole thing I'm sure.
I don’t see a reason why those characters couldn’t have existed in the Batman universe. Just because those characters doesn’t mean they have to be mentioned?
In what world is this eye roll worthy?
It's such a tough nut to crack and it kinda inherently fills the entire character of Pattinson's Batman and its Gotham with so many holes I really do think that no matter who'd write it you'd kinda be doomed from the get-go. It's not even trying to fit a round peg on a square hole; it's trying to build an igloo on the Sahara desert. The DCU is very clearly not designed for a Batman like Pattinson's, and Pattinson's Batman isn't designed from the DCU.
But it isn't just an aesthetic thing dude. It's the entire foundation of Reeves Batman. Every single decision he made regarding that film and Pattinson's character was viewed through those lens. Matt went on the record about it. Batman is supposed to be the one fantastical thing in a realistic universe; he even said the only way a Superman crossover could work is if Superman is presented as yet another fantastical thing surrounded by realism, which is very much not what James is doing. The foundation for the DCU is that it's a world where heroes have existed for a long time and where all sorts of crazy nonsense is already commonplace.
Holes? The basis of any crossover, is the odd couple nature of it. Saying Battinson isn't built for the DCU itself is a faulty premise, as would be saying SuperCorn isn't built for Reeves' Batman.
If the Jimmy/Timmy Power Hour can exist, then I don't see why we can't force Matt Reeves into a cinematic universe.
You can say that about any story idea. I can tell you "Yeah if they made a movie where suddenly Nolanverse Batman travelled to Mars and fought aliens it'd probably suck because it's a bad idea", or "Yeah if Joaquin's Joker suddenly met Gorilla Grodd and founded the Legion of Doom in Joker 3 that'd make no sense and would probably make for a bad movie" and you can say "but what if it was good though"
Ok but what if it was good though?
We're talking about a Batman/Superman crossover. A pretty common crossover. Sometimes bad, sometimes good, sometimes great.
And we're talking about a very very very specific version of Batman that was built through some very specific lens and was very carefully crafted in every single way. You're also talking about a version of the DC Universe that likewise seems to have already an extremely clear and planned idea of what it is going for and has already laid a lot of groundwork for what its history is supposed to be even before anything from it released.
