The NEW Batman?

I was wondering about how long Bruce waited until he acted, since I remember reading Year One but forgot the exact number. However, I'm not sure how you arrived at your figures but the calculator I used, and I double checked it as well, puts Bruce's age at 7 years old when his parents died. See for yourself:

25 (age Bruce was when he started as Batman)
-18 (number of years since the night his parents were killed)
------
= 7 (age Bruce was when his parents were murdered)

I won't hold it against you though. :cwink:

WTF?!?

25-18=7...... how do you get 12?!?

Sorry guys I havent slept in 4 days now and I'm going nuts:woot:
 
Second, while Tim has had to endure the loss of both his parents, Stephanie, and Conner (not to mention Bart), all of which is tragic for him, that I've never denied, it is not (and I'm sorry if this sounds harsh, or would you prefer "******ed?") quite at the same level as Bruce when he lost his parents. Why? Correct me if I'm wrong but Tim never witnessed his parents, Stephanie, Conner, or Bart actually die in front of him when they were killed. Second, nearly all the deaths happened while he was in his teenage years, and while that certainly would be a life changing experience for him, he is still old enough to process it. By contrast, Bruce actually saw his parents murdered right in front of him while he was still very young. It's a big difference having someone you loved killed and finding out about it after the fact and having actually witness the people you love being murdered when you're still too young to completely understand what is happening. Tim, given his age and the fact that he never actually witnessed any of the deaths, would have a much better chance, although it certainly would be hard to get over of coping with the death, of his loved ones than Bruce did.

Also, I'd argue that, from a dramatic standpoint, it is a little excessive what Tim went through, hence why I called what happened to him Maudlin. Perhaps melodramatic would be a better word. When Tim lost his mom to violence prior to becoming Robin, that was understandable in terms of establishing him as Robin. When he lost his dad, that made sense from a narrative standpoint to further tie him in with Batman. But then when the Spoiler was killed and then Superboy, and not to mention Bart--well then the pilling on of deaths is really starting to become excessive and, in a way, cheapen the impact of death for the character, IMO. And it's also transparent because it's DC's obvious attempt at setting Tim to be Batman's successor should they decide to have Bruce kick the bucket. Heck, personality wise, Tim is behaving more and more like a Batman than he is a Robin. However, by the very fact he was Robin to begin with, Tim was already being groomed to take over anyway, so trying to darken the character more is completely unnecessary.

Tim is obviously a Death Magnet, which is why I think he'll be around when Batman does in fact die. He'll see him and not be able to help to do anything, and because of this, he ends up under the Mantle, and NOT taking up a Robin. He was the one to say that Batman NEEDED a Robin, but with all the death and stuff surrounding him as Robin, I can see him taking up the Mantle and not having someone else sidekick with him.
 
Well, Dan DiDio hates Young Justice. Coincidence that most of their members are no longer used or are dead? I think not.
 
Still sucks.


Keep em human, keep em alive. :down
 
Kill him and leave him dead:cmad: New Godhood sucks. Dying and coming back as a New God? That's like anime s**t
 
What do you know? :cmad:
 
Turning him into a New God is really destroys the character. You'd be giving the one guy who made it without superpowers...ultimate power.
 
Wow.....maybe Didio got into Morrisson's halucenigenic drug stash.
 
Ok so let me get this straight... as if Batman isn't a demigod with his crazy preptime deus ex machina abilities. Now you decide to empower with him with New God powers. On top of that, you have Grant Morrison writing this...?

This is going to be comedy gold. :D
 
Hard to say. Just about everything the guy types down is a bannable offense.
 
i don't know. If it was a culmination, it woulda been for good instead of a couple of days.
 
Jack Kirby would probably be insulted.
Yeah, probably. On the other hand, if the guy wasn't insulted by having to be in the same room as a hack like Stan Lee...maybe he's got a high tolerance.
 
I wonder how other writers would react to this idea.

Most probably wouldn't give a s**t. Loeb might be a little miffed, Ross might definitely be miffed, or not. Whatever goes down, will matter little in the long run when everything reverts back to status quo. Could be right after Final Crisis, could take a year or two. But eventually, it all goes back to the way it was. So, why care?
 
I wonder how he will be a New god if thats how it turns out, something that would be very silly.
 
Most probably wouldn't give a s**t. Loeb might be a little miffed, Ross might definitely be miffed, or not. Whatever goes down, will matter little in the long run when everything reverts back to status quo. Could be right after Final Crisis, could take a year or two. But eventually, it all goes back to the way it was. So, why care?

Still, even if the status quo will eventually reassert itself, putting the idea down in the first place is stupid.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,301
Messages
22,082,268
Members
45,882
Latest member
Charles Xavier
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"