jadejaws
Civilian
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2002
- Messages
- 566
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 36
Pot, meet kettle.
Weak...
Pot, meet kettle.
Weak...
That fact that they will not stay smashed also pisses him off to no end.
LMAO I keep forgetting that the only difference between Hulk fans and Batman fans is that Batman fans have enjoyed substantial success in the movie industry.
Shine on, you crazy green diamonds.
I feel like I should be the one saying this.
Some of us here are just voicing our opinions and likes or dislikes as to where we think the Hulk franchise has gone right and wrong.
Why do you feel you have to be disrespectful. Did I hurt your feelings long ago and you haven't forgotten it or something (I wouldn't put it past me)? Do you have mental issues maybe? How old are you...no serious? I need to know what level to deal with you on.
All Hulk fans don't agree on every aspect of the character, but we don't feel we have to be-little each other when we do. Why do you feel you have to? Does it make you feel better as a person? Are YOOUUU threatened by the possibility of a successful Hulk film?What does Batman have to do with anything said in these Hulk threads?
Hell, personally I enjoyed the Batman films and wish that every writer and director took note of how to make the ludicrous appeal to the masses. After years of watching The Nolan Batman film, I admit that they are the best put together comic films and two of the best films in general. But what does that have to do with 'Hulk' in Avengers?
All I had issue with was the blanket statement that YOUR personal ideal version of the Hulk was the one everyone prefers, and the rather idiotic idea that Marvel doesn't know how to handle it's own character. You guys are the ones that get ******** and defensive over anything remotely negative said about the character, as usual. Not me.
Further more, you are the one bringing up 'mental issues' and **** like that. And I'm the uncivil one? Classy, but not totally unexpected considering the source.
Now, is this the 'Hulk in Avengers' thread, or the "Boo hoo Whiskey Tango said things we don't like (but are true!) about our favorite sooper hero and we're gonna pout about it" thread?
I feel like the 50 cal. Is like shooting us with a paintball gun. Its gonna sting like a *****. Maybe cause some surface damage to the skin. But it is never actually gonna do any real damage.
Not for nothing ...since when has voicing MY opinion on a message board an insult to intelligent folks who have opinions and minds of their own...at least most of us do...some are in question at the moment. What threatens you about my posts so much...tell me?You're the one who started the acting defensive about MY post.
I bring up mental issues because I think you're crazy...to get defensive about my views on the Hulk movies, especially since you just jumped in the middle of the posting and added NO input...only cries and pleas and then you started talk CRAZY about Batman stuff that really had nothing to do with NOTHING in any of the previous posts. That's why I think you're a mental case...Are you? By the way what did Batman's success have to do with the thread?
No one's crying about who doesn't agree with them. It's not that we don't like others opinions...with you, you've said and added NOTHING relevant to this thread.. just make your points relevant is all.
Hey I'm a good sport...I LOVE to play...I'll officially bring you in...What do you like about the voiceless, opinion-less, inarticulate Hulk? Since this is what my beef is about with Marvel Studio's Hulk and YOUR'S being the opposing views of mine?![]()
You bring up mental issues because you chose the low road. Congratulations, hypocrite.
I never insulted your opinion. I said an 80 year old Banner was a bad idea. Before that, I wondered which version of the Hulk you felt was so superior, and was met with hostility from you and others. That's when I compared you to Batfans. I was right, and you continue to prove it.
As for the rest, I never said which version of Hulk I like best, and you're currently too busy with your snotty tone, so piss off.
Keep diggin yourself deeper, mate. You and I are done here.
So, for those of you without a stick up their ass, who prefer the savage version of Hulk (apparently the one preferred by 30 out of 30 Helens) - how do you propose this Hulk interact with the rest of the Avengers aside from being an opponent? Didn't this same character spend the last 5 decades getting pissed at everyone who looked at him funny? That doesn't sound like it would make for a very trustworthy teammate.
the rather idiotic idea that Marvel doesn't know how to handle it's own character.
You bring up mental issues because you chose the low road.
Didn't this same character spend the last 5 decades getting pissed at everyone who looked at him funny? That doesn't sound like it would make for a very trustworthy teammate.
And back on topic
http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2011/05/the_hulk_the_strongest_one_the.html
possible movie plot:
"He had a pivotal role in the creation of The Avengers. Thor's evil half-brother Loki tricked Thor into believing The Hulk was on a murderous rampage. Thor went after him and was aided by the other new superheroes in the Marvel universe: Iron Man, Ant-Man and The Wasp."
The title of the article sounds promising.
I'm not sure if that's the plot though. In the article they also stated Bruce Banner got tricked into running towards the "gamma radiation" which sounds more like his gamma bomb origin from the comics, than his origin from television or the theatrical releases.
The title of the article sounds promising.
I think it rather idiotic that first, they thought it was necessary to include Starfish, Jellyfish, nano-meds and the kitchen sink in order to create the Hulk, to make it more believable.
True Gamma, but to me in coincides with all the Loki-Hulk puppet rumors. Not that Loki is controlling Hulk but making Hulk think he is being attacked by Thor and causes him to do damage to a small town or major city. Then Loki can trick Thor into going after him and the battle to end all battles begins.
Title: "Meet The Hulk, the Strongest Avenger"
Woo hoo! That was like verbal Viagra! I like where this is going! Giggity!
well at the time they hired an academy award winning director, clearly they wanted to make the movie a big dramatic serious film, they can't be blamed for having faith in Ang lee ( who at the time was held in high regard)
well at the time they hired an academy award winning director, clearly they wanted to make the movie a big dramatic serious film, they can't be blamed for having faith in Ang lee (who at the time was held in high regard)
I don't think it's Marve l doesn't care about Hulk, clearly they do, it's that they really don't get the appeal of the character. I think the problem with Ang's Hulk was they took too many liberties with the character and as for the character in general, they keep trying to force the nostalgia of the television show in with the classic comics, but the blend has not been working.
I'd buy that for a dollar.![]()