"needs to"? I don't see it. Kevin Feige still tells an anecdote 18 years later about "someday, someday..." being able to give X-Men comic book visuals unlike the 2000 film he worked on. Bob Iger and the board surely see X-Men as the more lucrative.
Not yet. Since the annoucement of the DOJ appealing AT&T/Time Warner merger many saw that as the effectively destroying Comcasts chances of ever winning Fox from Disney so now its expected by many analysts that Comcast will throw in the towel and just focus on Sky.So... what about them Disney buying Fox news? Any new news?
So... what about them Disney buying Fox news? Any new news?
So... what about them Disney buying Fox news? Any new news?
Then Ozzy "Mama, I'm Coming Home"
So it probably would've skipped over the origin, eh? Don't think that approach would entirely work.Youve previously mentioned meeting up with Joss Whedon and saying that his first Avengers movie was similar to what you had in mind back when you almost tackled a Fantastic Four film. Could you share what you had in mind with your Fantastic Four
Reed: I mean, that was as far back as 2003, so its like 15 years ago. But the basic idea for thatwhich felt exciting to me at the time, and I think part of the reason I said that to Josswas creating a set of superheroes with no secret identities. I mean, all these things are 15-year-old concepts, right? And everything has been done since then. But the idea of making, you know, you go to Manhattan and theres the Empire State Building, and theres the Statue Of Liberty, and theres the Baxter Building, and the Fantastic Four are just a part of the fabric of New York and everyone knows them. These are things that really werent done quite as much in 2003 and now theyre kind ofthey seem really passé.But also just the idea of a structure. At one point we were toying with A Hard Days Night structure, where you skipped entirely over the origin stuff and just present them in full, Fantastic Four mode, but I have to say a lot of the stuff we talked about back then, you know, was Fantastic Four as dysfunctional family, and The Avengers did a great job of that. And theres a lot of that DNA, I think, in the Ant-Man movies that really is about family, and heroes who have very intimate relationships with each other.
What's going to happen at Marvel Entertainment when Disney becomes Netflix's competitor? Does Netflix have a legal right to force ME to make more seasons of Luke Cage, Daredevil, Jessica Jones, Iron Fist, The Defenders and/or The Punisher in perpetuity? That would really hurt Disney. People are going to choose between Netflix, Hulu, and a family-friendly Disney-brand service, not subscribe to all three.
They're just the distributor. Disney via ABC Studios & Marvel TV make the shows.
My playlist the day they announce it sealed and kissed...
Petty's song I already mentioned.
Bare Naked Ladies "Call and Answer" for Fiege to take that dang call and answer us fans,
INXS "Good Times"
"Nothing but a Good Time"
Brubeck's "Take Five" to catch my breath...
Then Ozzy "Mama, I'm Coming Home"
Until then, first song on endless, please oh Eternity and Living Tribunal, end this, loop.
It worked for both Blade and X-men so I think skipping over their origin in the first film would've been fine, even back in the early 2000s, although I do agree I want someone else for F4. He should probably focus onPeyton Reed speaks a bit more about his ill-fated Fantastic Four film.
So it probably would've skipped over the origin, eh? Don't think that approach would entirely work.
Ive never seen the Blade movies(embarrassed to admit this ) so I cant comment on those but your X-Men example is imperfect as they dont need an origin film since its assumed they were born with their powers as all Mutants are. Theres no origin story required for the X-Men like the FF. The FF got their superpowers in an accident that changed their lives forever. That cant be easily brushed over. Of course you could mention the incident in a throwaway line of dialogue but it would be much more better to just show what happen instead of speak about what happened.It worked for both Blade and X-men so I think skipping over their origin in the first film would've been fine, even back in the early 2000s, although I do agree I want someone else for F4. He should probably focus on
Ant-man 3 instead TBH.
From what I remember Netflix can make new seasons of Luke Cage, Daredevil, etc as long as they want.
If you're right, that really hurts Disney financially. What legal recourse would Iger and the board have to get out of such a deal? Order Loeb to triple Marvel TV's production costs?![]()
Get Scott Buck to run all the Netflix shows. That would see them getting canceled before long, lol.
I love how passionate Reed is about the F4 but I'm not sure he's the right man for the job.
Hmm, interesting: Disney has a market cap only $8.5 billion lower than Netflix. If their streaming service is even slightly more attractive, they could grow a lot bigger at Netflix's expense.
We'll have to see how their debt compares after every 21st Century Fox shareholder has made their choice of stock/cash.
Ive never seen the Blade movies(embarrassed to admit this ) so I cant comment on those but your X-Men example is imperfect as they dont need an origin film since its assumed they were born with their powers as all Mutants are. Theres no origin story required for the X-Men like the FF. The FF got their superpowers in an accident that changed their lives forever. That cant be easily brushed over. Of course you could mention the incident in a throwaway line of dialogue but it would be much more better to just show what happen instead of speak about what happened.
At least show how they got their powers in the opening( ala Incredible Hulk).