- Joined
- Aug 17, 2003
- Messages
- 72,561
- Reaction score
- 43,495
- Points
- 203
Were the Dracula films part of a wider universe maintained by a visionary with a very specific vision? Ditto for Bond. And these movies came out in a completely different Hollywood landscape. 40 years ago.
"Last time I was New York, I kinda broke... Harlem." That's a vague reference. Betty, Blonsky and Ross (at first) did not return in The Avengers. Every other main Avenger had a supporting character in TA.
That's why I say Hulk is a more apt comparison. Feige didn't even want Norton in 2008, he wanted Ruffalo from the get go. And once they had a falling out, they recast Banner and redesigned Hulk. Only vaguely referencing the events that happened in TIH. Marvel was reluctant to embrace Hulk's solo and that's because of Universal's involvement and even now, they still treat TIH as the redheaded step child of the MCU. It didn't even get a special Blu Ray re-release like all of the other films. Daredevil is an even more extreme version of the situation with Universal because Feige had nothing at all to do with the creation of the Cox Daredevil. He had no input and his vision may be significantly different than Loeb and Drew Goddard.
Vague or not, it is a reference. This is not an opinion, it is a fact. End of discussion. When has Iron Man referenced IM3 outside of when he said he "Trashed his suits" in CW. That is just as vague, so by your logic, the MCU is ignoring IM3!!!!

Last edited:
) news! Really surprised based on their position with this that a decision would be so imminent.
