Bim
Superhero
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2008
- Messages
- 9,792
- Reaction score
- 183
- Points
- 73
Gladly! U paying for my plane ticket and hotel then?You guys need to make a trip to the States this Friday.

Gladly! U paying for my plane ticket and hotel then?You guys need to make a trip to the States this Friday.
Gladly! U paying for my plane ticket and hotel then?![]()
If it does reach $195 million, it will have beaten TA for admissions.Boxoffice.com has now updated it's prediction and is tracking $195 Million for the opening weekend.
www.boxoffice.com/statistics/long_term_predictions
Not if you lose one of your young moneymaking stars in the process.Christopher Nolan always comes in under budget and has more than overdelivered on pretty much every movie he's made for Warners, which is why he's earned this kind of leverage. But it's still a business. In pretty much any other circumstance, leaving $200 million on the table especially in this economic climate is enough to get most high level executives fired.
To be fair, I saw Inception in a theater a few days AFTER it was released on DVD. This was at a second-run dollar theater, though. And the theater-to-DVD time has cut down drastically. Titanic was in theaters for a year. Now it's more like, 5 months.Beating Avengers...ok sure, It's improbable but not impossible, beating Titanic? That's pretty impossible considering that film was in cinemas right up to it's video release.
If it does reach $195 million, it will have beaten TA for admissions.
Not if you lose one of your young moneymaking stars in the process.
I think WB thought keeping Nolan happy (and at WB) was better business sense than forcing 3D onto him. Nolan's only 41, he still has many more movies left in him.
That's the problem with businesses nowadays, they think by quarterly profits rather than long-term performance.
To be fair, I saw Inception in a theater a few days AFTER it was released on DVD. This was at a second-run dollar theater, though. And the theater-to-DVD time has cut down drastically. Titanic was in theaters for a year. Now it's more like, 5 months.
That and Titanic's drops were out of this world. The only modern movie that could be vaguely equivalent is (surprise) Avatar.
It's a rip off because nothing is added to a post converted film. They're charging people extra for complete bull ****. On top of that 3D screenings outnumber 2D screenings. Case in point, Spider-Man at my local was screening 6 sessions in 3D, only 3 in 2D. It's a ****ing rip off.
OW doesn't make a Titanic sinker. The drops do, which is why Avatar was able to do it. It didn't drop at all its second weekend, and posted small drops every weekend thereafter. Unfortunately, that won't happen for TDKR. TDKR will act like a summer blockbuster, but hopefully one on steroids, just like TDK did.Depending on OW, tdkr has a chance to sink the ship "again" for a third time now.
We will know by Next Sunday.....
Depending on OW, tdkr has a chance to sink the ship "again" for a third time now.
We will know by Next Sunday.....
With this the math just doesn't seem to add up to me. With the demographics, I think it will be in the 180-190M range, which is a huge accomplishment.
I get that, but people have a choice, and it's no more of a rip off than all the marketing with IMAX where the vast majority of screens aren't even the true IMAX standard.
People will always be marketed to the hilt with stuff like this. I just feel as long as people have a choice it's not a problem.
The film industry has shown to be one of the few industries to buck the trend when it comes to economic downturns. They won't get any sympathy from me.
Theater attendance hit a 16 year low in 2011.
Believe me, Mr. Stark, it is not a huge accomplishment. People (and critics) wanna see it beating the avengers. That will give them something awesome to talk about for weeks and months and even years to come.
That's the only way it will be considered as a huge accomplishment. Yes it does matter, alot infact, if it beats the avengers OW, and vice versa (if doesnt beat it).
That's the way it is. It's not about math. it's about us, how we feel. We like to see records made only to be broken again.
If the release dates were switched TDKR at $190m would have broken the previous record by more than $20m. It would also have outdone TDK after so many put that figure solely down to Heath Ledger's death. It's the same as saying if something bigger came out a few months before Avengers then Avengers' $207m would not be considered a big accomplishment.Believe me, Mr. Stark, it is not a huge accomplishment. People (and critics) wanna see it beating the avengers. That will give them something awesome to talk about for weeks and months and even years to come.
That's the only way it will be considered as a huge accomplishment. Yes it does matter, alot infact, if it beats the avengers OW, and vice versa (if doesnt beat it).
That's the way it is. It's not about math. it's about us, how we feel. We like to see records made only to be broken again.