Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]388429[/split]
Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.
Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Due to recent news involving X, formerly Twitter and its owner, the staff of SuperHeroHype have decided it would be best to no longer allow links on the board. Starting January 31st, users will no longer be able to post direct links to X on this site, however screenshots will still be allowed as long as they follow Hype rules and guidelines. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Same.I'm going to watch this in a regular theater first and then when demand dies down, I'll watch it in real IMAX.
Rogue, TDK had 27 minutes of IMAX footage.
So, can anyone tell me how much spoilers do we have? Should i start avoiding spoiler forums or the internet already if i don't want anything major spoiled?
The next 2-3 days will hell for those who want to avoid spoilers.So, can anyone tell me how much spoilers do we have? Should i start avoiding spoiler forums or the internet already if i don't want anything major spoiled?
From 27 minutes to 72 minutes. Nolan and Wally were not f'ing around this time!
So, can anyone tell me how much spoilers do we have? Should i start avoiding spoiler forums or the internet already if i don't want anything major spoiled?
Rogue, TDK had 27 minutes of IMAX footage.
Yep, upping the ante big time. Will be interesting to see how much IMAX footage is in the Star Trek sequel. That one is being converted to 3D, which seems to undermine the point of shooting in IMAX to begin with IMHO.
So, can anyone tell me how much spoilers do we have? Should i start avoiding spoiler forums or the internet already if i don't want anything major spoiled?
I'm wondering, are most of you ok with no 3D? I personally don't care for it. I thought it would have gone away by now, but the trend continues. I'd prefer 2D if not IMAX.
IMAX > 3D > 2D, IMO
3D serves a purpose (expanding the field of view beyond the screen) which is great for very large open shots of foreign places as in "Avatar". But it doesn't need to be in every bloody movie that comes out. And it's not worth the over-bloated price compared to 2D. I'd rather save my cash and catch the 3D when/if it will make any difference.
IMAX actually improves the quality of the picture and doesn't require anything of the viewer (such as glasses) which is great for epic, large scale action as in most of Nolan's recent endeavors. He makes very good points on the matter in most of the interviews he does.
I don't know about Imax, but it's 2D>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>... 3D to me.
I'm wondering, are most of you ok with no 3D? I personally don't care for it. I thought it would have gone away by now, but the trend continues. I'd prefer 2D if not IMAX.