[url]http://www.mercurynews.com/entertainment/ci_21096317/review-stunning-dark-knight-rises[/URL]
San Jose Mercury. Another positive review.t:
I did but lots of critics dont. I made a thread that said I was worried This Batman trilogy wouldn't be considered perfect because of BB. Looks like I won't have to worry because TDKR won't be as good as TDK either...
Is this gonna end up in RT?
Is this gonna end up in RT?
I know it's just a few posters (cough Forever MS cough) but freaking out because it has an 85% rating is beyond madness. There are classic films with ratings in the 70's on RT for **** sake. Let's not even get into how sad it is to have a minority of critical reactions ruin a movie for you.
I'm more concerned as to why people are freaking out when there are still 200 reviews yet to come.
Chicago critic, Michael Phillips, gives it a 2.5 stars.
Chicago critic, Michael Phillips, gives it a 2.5 stars.
Chicago critic, Michael Phillips, gives it a 2.5 stars.
Troll or Why So Serious?
Chicago critic, Michael Phillips, gives it a 2.5 stars.
God knows. Is it really going to stop anyone seeing the movie? Going in with tempered expectations might be a good thing. It's only a movie, it's not going to raise the dead or cure cancer.I'm more concerned as to why people are freaking out when there are still 200 reviews yet to come.
Charlie McCollum is on RT.
Perfect execution of a Dr. Cox gif
Perfect execution of a Dr. Cox gif.

God knows. Is it really going to stop anyone seeing the movie? Going in with tempered expectations might be a good thing. It's only a movie, it's not going to raise the dead or cure cancer.
Another positive![]()
God knows. Is it really going to stop anyone seeing the movie? Going in with tempered expectations might be a good thing. It's only a movie, it's not going to raise the dead or cure cancer.