!Superman!
Civilian
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2012
- Messages
- 307
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
so if the 4 "rotten" reviews get changed to fresh it would get this movie to 80% right? come on RT and WB. !
I have to wear my Superman shirt inside out now.

If I were Batman, I wouldn't be spending my time looking at what other people think of a movie constantly.![]()
Maybe expectations are just so ridiculously high that it is merited? I don't know, this is Superman, right? Greatest ****ing superhero that ever lived. You can't deliver something on ASM or IM3 level. This should have been comparable to Nolan's Batman series both critically and financially, perhaps not right off the bat, but in the sequels to come, assuming they come. It just doesn't look like the fantastic start we were hoping for.
When's Showtime seeing it?
so if the 4 "rotten" reviews get changed to fresh it would get this movie to 80% right? come on RT and WB. !

You know even if the start is not great, I always look forward to the sequels being better in a weird way. Think Batman Begins to Dark Knight and X-Men to X2: X-Men United. The sequels were really good. As long as this movie is a good/decent start, then we should be fine.
I knew it. So 3/5 is a fresh. So we could have like 4-5 extra fresh reviews for MoS.
What is RT doing? and is there a way to tell them to change it?
Don't worry I'm sure WB has their ninjas that will make sure all is fair in the end.t:
I'm not tying it into RT ratings but I'd definitely not want this to be like Transformers 3. Those movies might be good for the studio's wallet but I think they represent the really bad side of what an all out action movie can be. No brain, no heart, just action. Just my opinion though, of course, but I hope for something different with MOS. I'd take a good movie over a high grossing movie any day if that was my choices.why?
Transformers 3 made over $1 billion dollars and had a rating of 29%
If a 3/5 doesn't count as fresh, there is no way in hell I'm taking this tomato site seriously.

Are you posting from the future or something? How do you know how it did financially??

If a 3/5 doesn't count as fresh, there is no way in hell I'm taking this tomato site seriously.
The reviewers themselves decide that. Look at it as a yes or no question if they recommend going to see the movie. That's probably more accurate and coherent over the breadth of reviewers than how they are treating their various grade scales.Who decides whether a review is classified as rotten or fresh? Is it the reviewer or website?![]()
"Superman's return to the big screen is mostly successful, as Man of Steel provides enough exhilarating action and spectacle to overcome its occasional detours into generic blockbuster territory"
RT consensus..
Actually, that's a small positive (fresh).Looks like another negative review that has not been added to RT yet. It is Michael Phillips from the Chicago Tribune. MOS get two and a half stars:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/enter...v-0611-man-of-steel-20130612,0,2949067.column
Mjölnir;26072643 said:The reviewers themselves decide that.
but to give it 3/5 and call it rotten is sad.Actually, that's a small positive (fresh).
They always start that early and change it as new reviews are taken in. It's up to the viewer to look at the number of reviews.Isn't it a little early for a consensus? There are only 40 reviews up. I think I am officially done with Rotten Tomatoes.