Bran-El
Civilian
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2012
- Messages
- 506
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
I'd take something deathly serious over something as horrifically lighthearted as Iron Man 3 any day.
Besides overly serious comes off as unintentionally funny, right?
I'd take something deathly serious over something as horrifically lighthearted as Iron Man 3 any day.
They didn't insinuate that the film should be a comedy. Just that the film should've had moments of levity to undercut the overwhelming weight and drama if only for it to not choke on its own seriousness.I don't take the humor/too serious thing. Every superhero movie need humor? Since when?
I'd take something deathly serious over something as horrifically lighthearted as Iron Man 3 any day.
This is what I have being saying in previous post. Older generation who grew up loving Superman the movie are having a hard time moving on from this and is slamming MOS because it is nothing like it. From those that I know have seen it all loved it.

No really. RT goes up to 270 reviews for the most hyped films.
They didn't insinuate that the film should be a comedy. Just that the film should've had moments of levity to undercut the overwhelming weight and drama if only for it to not choke on its own seriousness.
Exactly. While I did like most of IM3's humor, it was too overdone. Batman, Superman, Punisher, Wolverine, etc should mostly be serious. Leave the humor to Spidey, Iron Man, and Deadpool.

I'm shocked Roeper was so harsh on it. His biggest criticism of it basically seemed to be that it was retelling the origin.
I still have a feeling this will divide critics way more than it divides the fanbase. Particularly the older critics. This is Superman for a new generation.
Really? Is this your educated guess?![]()

IMDB is troll central.. You will have tons of Marvel fans there rating it a 1 or 2 for laughs...
The guy's ****ing planet blew up and he's the last of his kind. He's an alien outsider. I really don't see where we can add humor here.Humor is a must in superman movie.
That's the same problem TASM dealt with. Donner's Superman and Raimi's Spider-Man both did a very good job telling the origin stories for those two characters. Burton left a nice little window of opportunity for a Batman origin movie, so BB had a pretty big advantage over TASM and MOS in this regard.
The guy's ****ing planet blew up and he's the last of his kind. He's an alien outsider. I really don't see where we can add humor here.
Flying men in capes is grave business in Snyder's solemn Superman. "Man of Steel," an origin tale of the DC Comics hero, goes more than two hours before the slightest joke or smirk.

It's honestly shocking that someone I usually respect like Roeper would be so shortsighted and dare I say selfish to say Superman doesn't need another origin movie. Kids growing up today are NOT necessarily familiar with Superman's origin story, that is the whole point. It's been 35 years since that story has been given the epic big screen treatment.
I'm not even trying to get on the bandwagon of naysaying every criticism that comes this movie's way, but faulting it for being an origin movie seems to demonstrate a real lack of cultural awareness. I'm a bit surprised at Roeper for that. That is where I feel critics ought to try an be more objective.
Haha, perhaps.Morbid humor could have applied.
This is off the yahoo review and it seriously pissed me off:
Da hell are these people expecting? A freakin' comedy?![]()
Morbid humor could have applied.