piccolo
Doom is watching you
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2004
- Messages
- 1,574
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 56
In light of the last page or two accurately deducing Bane's independence from Talia as a character and understanding his motivations, I'd like to share some thoughts on the character.
Bane is the best villain Nolan's thus far written in his career. The thing is, the Joker doesn't challenge Bruce on every level. He basically points out uncomfortable truths about him (he's more or less the same as the Joker [insane] and just copes with it differently), forcing him to question his moral decisions, because morality is such a massive part of the character and the themes in Dark Knight, it works wonders as the underpinning 'point' of the narrative.
I want to be clear nothing I'm saying is meant to devalue TDK or The Joker.
Bane, on the other hand, demonstrates the weight of the original choices Bruce Wayne made on becoming the character in the film first, challenging the very essence of that choice, simultaniously empowering that decision and showing its importance while tearing Bruce Wayne apart and his legacy with it, forcing Bruce to confront perhaps the most uncomfortable truth about the character in Nolan's films and the mythos of bruce- Batman is an emotional compulsion, it's a need to excise his demons, it's for him, not for the city. That uncomfortable truth dominates the first half of the movie from Alfred's poignant and critical monologues to Bane annihilating everything that enabled Batman to be Batman( the darkness, the theatricality, the power of fighting with such fierce skill, and finally, he takes control of his arsenal, the thing that ultimately enabled him to become the persona) whereas this is something The Joker only hints at and never focuses on. This is why the primary reason the time spent in the pit is so powerful and triumphant, he finally learns how to be empowered and let Batman be a symbol to Gotham, something seperate from himself, fulfilling the ultimate goal and plan he logicaly wanted for his city- something that couldn't have been satisfied were it not for Bane and his relationship and mirror-like nature to Bruce.
So that, and the social uprising, the terror, the emotive horror in his eyes, the conquerer, the dictator, all those things, along with what he means to that character and how it means so much more than The Joker frankly ever could, is why I think Bane is, objectively, a much better villain than his predecessor.
-Vader
I...totally agree. Its an unpopular choice because Heath's Joker has been iconized to the point where anything less than deity-like praise is blasphemy, but I do think Bane was the best villain character the series had.
One difference is that I still think Heath's Joker was the best performance of the series so far. He literally made the TDK for me, and every scene he wasn't in was one I just spent waiting for his next appearance. Character-acting wise he was just phenomenal.
But Bane was the best villain, imo, for all the reasons you listed and more. The global, blanketing scale of his machinations, his rich and utterly captivating backstory (that unfortunately was handed down to Talia

He was such a complete villain and did it all for me. You did a really nice job in your breakdown of his appeal.
Last edited: