Marvin
Avenger
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2003
- Messages
- 19,564
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
Consider the source of Kevin Smith's info ..... ***cough Ben Afllect cough***
Also read Goyer's comments one more time .....
David S Goyer:
When Goyer was asked whether or not he was surprised about the backlash surrounding Superman breaking General Zod's neck at the end of Man of Steel, he replied: "To a certain extent, Superman, cinematically, hadn't been reinvented since the Donner films. We will be dealing it with the coming film. He's not fully formed in [Man of Steel]. He will have to deal with the repercussions in the next film."
Regardless, how does a city just ignore that kind of damage? That kind of oversight in a movie would be utterly baffling and addressing it wouldn't change anything or take away from Snyder's decisions in the first film.
This says nothing about how a city reacts or ignores to anything. Rather that said damage will be a plot or talking point in some form or fashion. For example if he said superman will have to deal with the repercussions of killing zod, that could mean any number of things. It could mean he has Captain Stacy like hauntings and personal struggles that are then dealt with or it could mean he can't pull the trigger when facing batman, but it doesn't automatically mean people in the city will be scared of the killer... Long story short, dealing with something(in this case destruction) could mean a hand full of things. Including that of a personal struggle that then needs to be risen to, or of course Luthor and his personal affliction with the damage...Doesn't necessarily mean the 'city will react' in any particular way.
Just saying, it could be anything.
