TheNextNolan22
Hurting Really REALLY BAD
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2012
- Messages
- 40,202
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
"Actors CAN NEVER improve" 


this is some of the most obvious sarcasm I've seen all day, of course it's not serious.
"Actors can NEVER improve"![]()
I'm not saying that Affleck wasn't miscast. I'm saying that it's been a full decade. How LONG does Ben have to carry the legacy of Daredevil, especially after directing such hits and working on his career as an actor?
He hasn't been bad in the last roles I've seen him in. He's just been...adequate.I honestly thought he was good in The Town, To The Wonder and Argo.
the problem is the people against ben bring up movies that are 10 years old like gigli,daredevil,pearl harbor,paycheck,etc....and?
EDIT: Seriously, if people are still allowed to cite movies like Hollywood Land and Good Will Hunting as an indicator of his acting ability then Daredevil is fair game, period.
Buttle it, buttle the penis!Sigh...typical woman, only thinking about penises.

the problem is the people against ben bring up movies that are 10 years old like gigli,daredevil,pearl harbor,paycheck,etc.
while people for ben bring up his recent work like argo,the town,the company men,etc.
t:the problem is the people against ben bring up movies that are 10 years old like gigli,daredevil,pearl harbor,paycheck,etc.
while people for ben bring up his recent work like argo,the town,the company men,etc.
the problem is the people against ben bring up movies that are 10 years old like gigli,daredevil,pearl harbor,paycheck,etc.
while people for ben bring up his recent work like argo,the town,the company men,etc.
Pretty much this. They're stuck in a 2001-2003 mentality.
Well she was **** in that Catwoman inspired superherione embarrassmentBerry wasn't playing Catwoman, though![]()
And Clooney has had a lot of success as a director, too.
He's not right for the role. You will never convince me he is. He is a terrible actor who can't do serious if his life depended on it. He doesn't have the look, he doesn't look threatening or tough. I'm telling you, Michael Keaton can not be Batman!!!!!!

He's not right for the role. You will never convince me he is. He is a terrible actor who can't do serious if his life depended on it. He doesn't have the look, he doesn't look threatening or tough. I'm telling you, Michael Keaton can not be Batman!!!!!!
It's happened at least once. Seriously, I've no beef with Affleck's rise as a writer and director...but as an actor.....A lot can change in 10 years... Even Affleck admitted it was a bad point in his life. He then went under the radar and reemerged. He has directed three publicly and critically acclaimed, one of which a best picture which he was the lead. And you don't win them if your main star is crap.
Not really.daredevil wasn't entirely affleck's fault. that writer/director who also did ghost rider kinda ruined it. it was too hokey. like it was a fan film that no one wanted to make or see. i liked that scene where dd chases that thug, beats the crap out of him, then the thug's son walks in and he says "i'm not the bad guy, kid." pretty good scene.
Some are bringing up Hollywood Land and Good Will Hunting as well.the problem is the people against ben bring up movies that are 10 years old like gigli,daredevil,pearl harbor,paycheck,etc.
while people for ben bring up his recent work like argo,the town,the company men,etc.
why is this still an argument? it's done. if you don't like him, don't watch the movie(even though anyone who says they won't will...multiple times). it's this kind of outrage that makes fanboys look like lunatics.
has backlash ever made a studio change their minds?
Some are bringing up Hollywood Land and Good Will Hunting as well.
he was a hell of alot better than bale's batmanHe kinda sucked as batman imo lol
