I know that the 3% figure could have quoted around to create hype but I think the actual figure was definitely closer to that than 10. And for the abs, the above is not a great shot but in the movie when he is rummaging the clothes on the line, his abs really stuck out and look very clearly defined. We actually don't have many official stills to go by, but for a moment let's look at Immortals where he claimed he had around 5% body fat and shaved his torso for the definition to show
As a basic rule, when someone publicizes their weight or body fat % in Hollywood, it's always exaggerated.

Or they used a very inaccurate measuring tool like calipers.
At 3% body fat, you should have been seeing distinctive muscle striations and veins popping out on him. You don't. He doesn't have to be super tan. I can see my own muscle striations in my shoulders sometimes and I'm pretty pale. He's closer to 10%. Which is a GOOD thing, because I think striations and veins are disgusting.

It's obvious he's put on a **** ton of muscle, he doesn't need to be all striated to look impressive.
I'm a woman and the only reason you can see the muscles and ligaments in my arms is because I don't have much fat cells on my upper body. I put it all on my lower half. I'm probably closer to 20% body fat if you consider my entire state. You don't have to be sub-5% to look amazing, but Hollywood likes to tout their actors as having pushed SO HARD for their roles.
I'm not saying what Henry did isn't impressive. It sure is. Especially how his pecs were so damn
solid.

But Hollywood has made women feel bad for years by exaggerating how skinny their models and actresses get. Yeah, they're skinny but if they were at the weight they purportedly are, most of them would be in the hospital.

I don't think putting similarly impossible high standards on men counts as equality....