It was an alright conclusion. Nolan could've done better if he wasnt so pretentious and wanted to cram so much into one story. Didnt he call this movie the best war movie since the silent era??![]()
![]()
Why was Nolan pretentious?
It was an alright conclusion. Nolan could've done better if he wasnt so pretentious and wanted to cram so much into one story. Didnt he call this movie the best war movie since the silent era??![]()
![]()
So we have to accept this BS excuse for the fact the movie dragged for the first hour???![]()
I think the problem is that they completely forgot about his injuries as soon as he got out of the pit. His body was like brand new.![]()
Didnt he call this movie the best war movie since the silent era??![]()
He said this was the best War movie since the silent era which I don't even have words to describe this BS quote.Why was Nolan pretentious?

He said this was the best War movie since the silent era which I don't even have words to describe this BS quote.
http://screencrush.com/dark-knight-rises-silent-film/
Ego ruined him. Period. His movie has script 101 flaws.

He said this was the best War movie since the silent era which I don't even have words to describe this BS quote.
http://screencrush.com/dark-knight-rises-silent-film/
Ego ruined him. Period. His movie has script 101 flaws.
He said this was the best War movie since the silent era which I don't even have words to describe this BS quote.
http://screencrush.com/dark-knight-rises-silent-film/
Ego ruined him. Period. His movie has script 101 flaws.
wow, you're an idiot
So, whenever a filmmaker says its the biggest movie since the silent era, it is still ridiculous. I've read the article many times and still think he's inflating his ego.
He said this was the best War movie since the silent era which I don't even have words to describe this BS quote.
http://screencrush.com/dark-knight-rises-silent-film/
Ego ruined him. Period. His movie has script 101 flaws.
So, whenever a filmmaker says its the biggest movie since the silent era, it is still ridiculous. I've read the article many times and still think he's inflating his ego. Because the WAR part was the one of the WORST parts of this movie.
He should've kept quiet. Period.
It's liked he defined the movie before people even saw it. To me that doesn't sound right at all.
Call me an idiot as much as you like, i didnt like that at all.
While you may have read it many times, clearly you did not read it enough times because you completely misunderstood/misread what he said.
A number of people have pointed this out to you and yet you persist, which is strange to say the least.
It is not as though you don't have form I suppose, given that most (if not all) of the so called 'plot holes' you 'identify' are based on misconceptions/lack of attention and have been quite easily explained, only for you to repeat the ill-conceived arguments a few pages further on.
So, whenever a filmmaker says its the biggest movie since the silent era, it is still ridiculous. I've read the article many times and still think he's inflating his ego. Because the WAR part was the one of the WORST parts of this movie.
He should've kept quiet. Period.
It's liked he defined the movie before people even saw it. To me that doesn't sound right at all.
Call me an idiot as much as you like, i didnt like that at all.
Who are you really UaalaDan lol?
t:And he would be correct in that regard. This movie had the biggest set pieces involving thousands of extras that we've probably seen in our lifetime.