I very strongly disagree, if you're talking about the TDK trilogy.
Maybe you need a little refresher...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFSqcqK3KB4
I am talking about all Batman films. They never really depicted him as detective, like comics tend to do.
This was a great scene showing Batman's strategic prowess in battle (though it is a bit spoiled by the fact that in order to do so, Batman had to rely on a technology that is a bit too "out there" for this grounded universe), but one can count scenes like this in entire trilogy on the fingers of one hand.
And my "problem" with Batman in TDK trilogy is that he was either punching, threatening and asking questions (which is quite legitimate part of Batman's M.O.) or was relying too heavily on ridiculously advanced technology from Wayne Ent. (something which also irks me with "Arkham" games).
He never really sat down and tried to connect the dots. For example, in "Batman Begins" it was told to us that he wanted to understand criminals, so he even immersed himself in criminal life to learn how they think, but we never really got to see him do psychological profiling, trying to understand what motivates his opponents and trying to out-think them.
Granted, both sequels told stories that demanded this approach - Joker was supposed to be the character one cannot fully understand and to lesser extent him failing to understand his opponent was needed in "The Dark Knight Rises" as well. He was far from Batman in his prime, but what made him lose the first fight with Bane was him completely underestimating him - "Ra's al Ghul
was the League of Shadows and I defeated him. Bane is just a mercenary."
Story called for him to do so, but dismissing and underestimating his opponents like this is not something an experienced Batman should do.
I'd like to see the version that is not simply tech-reliant, but actually carefully thinks about his real and potential enemies and comes up with elaborate plans to defeat them.