roach
I am the night
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2002
- Messages
- 46,699
- Reaction score
- 29
- Points
- 58
I have always wondered why they are so afraid of the costumes and play them down in superhero movies. In real life we have people that dress like "weirdos" and are very comfortable doing so. They are individuals and feel no need to blend in with society.
I dont see why superheros, especially the X-men would not get into that idea. The super powered folks or mutants would be i imagine just another sub culture that has their own unique style of dressing.
people who are in dangerous situations all the time know that black is the best to be dressed in.
![]()
Ok, how about this? The way that the character and his world is set up and the situations that he finds himself in, makes having an all-black costume the best way to go.
What evidence? Of what?
Starting to feel like we'll never see affleck in the suit
Starting to feel like we'll never see affleck in the suit
His costume should make sense within the internal context of the universe. "Would this Bruce Wayne character really willingly wear this? Why or why not?" Batman isn't hard to justify a costume for: he wants to appear threatening and theatrical to be memorable. Characters like Wolverine are much harder to justify, and that's why they haven't managed to shoehorn in a costume for him yet.Batman isn't real. So, does he really need "realistic" colors? And supposedly grey is just fine for "realism" too.
His costume should make sense within the internal context of the universe. "Would this Bruce Wayne character really willingly wear this? Why or why not?" Batman isn't hard to justify a costume for: he wants to appear threatening and theatrical to be memorable. Characters like Wolverine are much harder to justify, and that's why they haven't managed to shoehorn in a costume for him yet.
With more traditional "superhero" garb, you need a character who WANTS to be seen as a superhero. So Kick-Ass WANTS to be a superhero, so he is "allowed" to wear a superhero costume. The X-men DON'T want to be superheroes, so they are NOT allowed to wear superhero costumes. If you want to justify them wearing something unusual, it has to make sense for that character. For example, First Class gave the X-men Kevlar tactical gear that just "happened" to be yellow because Kevlar is naturally yellow. They justified the "superhero" costume from the comics as being armored gear rather than just putting them in superhero tights.
What I'm really trying to say is that costumes don't have to be "realistic", they just need to make sense as a character choice. If you want Batman to wear a bright blue cape, there needs to be a reason why Bruce would make that decision. It doesn't need to be explicitly given, but we need to be able to believe that the character would choose to wear the unusual attire.
The evidence that was the results by a group of scientists investigating night time urban camouflage for the military. Their conclusion was that a mix of black and grey is superior to all black because the night time urban environment is exactly that, a mix of different gradations of shadow and light, and actually all black stands out more under such conditions. So, an all black suit is NOT the best for the conditions that Batman typically operates under.
His costume should make sense within the internal context of the universe. "Would this Bruce Wayne character really willingly wear this? Why or why not?" Batman isn't hard to justify a costume for: he wants to appear threatening and theatrical to be memorable. Characters like Wolverine are much harder to justify, and that's why they haven't managed to shoehorn in a costume for him yet.
With more traditional "superhero" garb, you need a character who WANTS to be seen as a superhero. So Kick-Ass WANTS to be a superhero, so he is "allowed" to wear a superhero costume. The X-men DON'T want to be superheroes, so they are NOT allowed to wear superhero costumes. If you want to justify them wearing something unusual, it has to make sense for that character. For example, First Class gave the X-men Kevlar tactical gear that just "happened" to be yellow because Kevlar is naturally yellow. They justified the "superhero" costume from the comics as being armored gear rather than just putting them in superhero tights.
What I'm really trying to say is that costumes don't have to be "realistic", they just need to make sense as a character choice. If you want Batman to wear a bright blue cape, there needs to be a reason why Bruce would make that decision. It doesn't need to be explicitly given, but we need to be able to believe that the character would choose to wear the unusual attire.
Starting to feel like we'll never see affleck in the suit
I don't agree; I take issue with your example. The "weirdos" you mention are humans that feel different or want to be different, so they show it through their personal fashion. On the other hand, mutants are meant to be humans who are actually different from normal folks and are persecuted for it, so I think many of them would indeed want to blend in with everyone else to avoid constant persecution. I mean the X-Men movies, and many of the comics, have wrestled with that very topic.
Well, I think some people care too much about the "Why" of it all. At the end of the day, you could just say we're talking about some rich guy who dresses up as a bat and pummels mentally sick people from time to time. There really doesn't need to be a justification of why these characters wear the colors that they do. When you put too much reality into it beyond how these characters react to their situations, it just falls apart. It's just how they dress and they live in a fictional world where it doesn't matter.
If we truly cared about how real it all was, I think dealing with characters that are pretty much meant for kids/teens isn't the best way to deal with it. Even then, it's all fiction and however TPTB make things is their choice. So, if Batman can scare people in a rainbow suit, not because of how he looks, but because of what he can do, then it just is what it is. I think too much emphasis is placed on him being scary since it's not really how he looks that makes him scary especially when we've seen the character interact with many people who aren't criminals. So, it's why I find all these "realistic" conversations pretty amusing and just wonder "Why so serious?"
And I don't care much about any real world weapons, tools, or applications that people like bring up as a way to justify things because Batman ain't real. These things never bothered me when I first fell in love with the character as a kid and they don't now as an adult.
Agreed. I do believe "realism" should indeed be a part of all this, but it shouldn't take over to the point that it start to make unreasonable changes to the source material. People take this realism consideration way too far and make it far too important in a genre that is after all, fantasy at it's most fantastic.
^ Yes. HOW DARE MAGIC EXIST in this world of flying superheroes and terraforming devices!![]()
Wait, are you telling me that those two things aren't real?^ Yes. HOW DARE MAGIC EXIST in this world of flying superheroes and terraforming devices!![]()
Yeah, it's like people are treating grey as if it's come bright color compared to black or something. And that somehow darkness or absence of light is will make Batman look a lot different if he chose to hide (which barely seems to happen on film anyway).
Yep. It's all gotta be "real" and "serious".
http://world.time.com/2013/02/05/yo...r/slide/the-smartest-ninjas-didnt-wear-black/
A real life argument for the "dark blue" cape and cow designl. Also, almost all real life camo has a color break-up (ie.no solid black or grey)
I wouldn't mind if the suit had some type of light-reflective quality to blend in different settings. But I don't want Batman to go completely "invisibility-cape" on us. I want his silhouette to always be visible to the audience, unless he's in total "stealth mode."