BlackFox
Yautja
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2012
- Messages
- 14,844
- Reaction score
- 7,223
- Points
- 103
*sees that V For Vendetta is not in the Top 5 and removes self from conversation*
*sees that V For Vendetta is not in the Top 5 and removes self from conversation*
Other than the brilliant character interaction there is nothing there that makes it better than Iron Man 1 IMO some the action felt there for the sake of action and the final action scene was quite generic.
Yeah the bad guys really didnt match up well when compared to any Batman film in the current trilogy. The guy who played Loki did a good job but in the league of a Bane or Joker, no just no, not even Ra's, Two-Face or Catwoman.
And as for the alien things, well they were just there to get smacked by the good guys really. Again great fun to watch but nothing of substance.
Yeah I don't feel that Avengers will play well on multiple viewings. IMO once I get past "oh it's awesome to see Iron Man and Captain America on the same screen" there isn't much else. As many small flaws TDKR may have it will hold up on multiple viewings.
**** off is Avengers number 1. A load of fun it maybe but it would never be number 1 compared to some of the others on the list a superbly done comic book film but I struggle to see how it's better than Nolan's trilogy or Kick Ass.
Avengers as no. 1? ...Eh.

Other than the brilliant character interaction there is nothing there that makes it better than Iron Man 1 IMO some the action felt there for the sake of action and the final action scene was quite generic.
I like how you swat aside "brilliant character interaction" like it's a miniscule thing. It is the equivalent of "other than the brilliant performance of Heath Ledger TDK isn't all that". That is what makes the film. In an age of blockbusters where characters are stilted, brooding and angsty, Avengers is a refreshing return to the form of old Hollywood fun. No, it's not deep. But neither was Raiders or the Wizard of Oz.Other than the brilliant character interaction there is nothing there that makes it better than Iron Man 1 IMO some the action felt there for the sake of action and the final action scene was quite generic.
I like how you swat aside "brilliant character interaction" like it's a miniscule thing. It is the equivalent of "other than the brilliant performance of Heath Ledger TDK isn't all that". That is what makes the film. In an age of blockbusters where characters are stilted, brooding and angsty, Avengers is a refreshing return to the form of old Hollywood fun. No, it's not deep. But neither was Raiders or the Wizard of Oz.
And what I said is not the equivilent of "without Heath Ledger TDK isn't great", (which is a stupid statement anyway IMO) that just means if Ledger wasn't there TDK was a piece of crap what I'm saying without the quick, witty and refreshing interactions of big superheroes in the Avengers it does nothing special. It is still a good film the action is good, it looks good, the acting is good, every character has their moment but their isn't anything that makes it the greatest superhero film known to man.
Have to disagree. People went to see all these big superheroes on the big screen in one film with explosions all around with about 5 years of build up. If anything the fact the character interaction was so good was the icing on the cake. Only people who knew how good Whedon was with large casts (which wasn't that many before Avengers) were expecting it. The GA were expecting a big loud blockbuster with big names that is what all the trailers pointed to.Well of course. It you take out what makes a film special then you are left with a film that's not special. People didn't come to see the final act of the Avengers, that was just the icing on the cake, if they wanted that they would rewatch Bayformers; people came to see all these larger than life characters play off of each other.

Motivation has nothing to do with relatability. Your motivation can be as big as to rule the entire solar system and still be relatable or as small as stealing a lady's purse and be unrelatable. Relatability is overrated anyways; you don't need to relate, you just need to empathize, and both characters can absorb empathy with room to spare.You can relate to Bruce Wayne because from the moment his parents hit the pavement in Crime Alley to the end of his journey as Batman, his whole life was a realistic tragedy. Stuff like that CAN happen, but it's unlikely. It's not the same with Iron Man; his motive was to create world peace by stopping production of all weapons. That's unrealistic, no one would dare to try that.
Motivation has nothing to do with relatability. Your motivation can be as big as to rule the entire solar system and still be relatable or as small as stealing a lady's purse and be unrelatable. Relatability is overrated anyways; you don't need to relate, you just need to empathize, and both characters can absorb empathy with room to spare.