As I recall, the flak about Batman and Ra’s in BATMAN BEGINS was down to what Batman had done and whether it was murder. There wasn’t much flak over the line themselves there.
So basically you want something similar to Clooney's Batman speech to Bane at the end of B&R?
No, where do you get that from? I want Batman to come up with his own things to say, not use a less meaningful version of someone else’s dialogue.
"Then...you have my permission to die" was a fitting reprise of a powerful line.
Not really, because the subtext and meaning of the line is pretty weak compared to what it contained when Bane used it on Bruce.
When Bane used the line on Bruce, he had literally physically broken him. He was going to torture and destroy a city. He was going to torture Bruce Wayne’s mind.
Whereas when Batman uses the line, he’s beat the crap out of him, ok, but that doesn’t really compare. The line means what it means. “I beat you”. It doesn’t have any deeper meaning really, because Batman doesn’t intend to torture Bane or his city or any of that.
It’s just Batman repeating what Bane said to him earlier. It doesn’t really mean anything other than “Ha, I beat you, and when you give me what I want, you have my permission to die”.
Meh. Boring. Mildly confusing and annoying, since Batman’s supposedly not an executioner.
It's similar to "mind your surroundings" from BB, and one-line reprisals are something of movie cliche.
That wasn’t great dialogue, either. It was about as cliché as it gets, and he sounds like Tom Cruise with a cold when he says it.
Him getting back at Bane with that line wasn't about him actually wanting to kill him. It wasn't to be taken literally.
Then why say it?
Yeah, it was just Batman's clever way of saying "I've beaten you, I know you're in excruciating pain right now, but you're not off the hook until you tell me what I want to know." And throwing back Bane's cruel words in his face.
But it wasn’t clever. He used someone else’s words.
Being clever involves thinking for yourself.
Did you hate Batman's "You've never learned to mind your surroundings..." reversal on Ra's Al Ghul as well before he lets Ra's crumble to his death as well?
Hate? No. It’s the kind of thing Batman says all the time in the comics. I think it’s cheesy and cliché in an “almost every martial arts movie does this” sort of way, but there’s actual meaning to that line, too. It actually has a purpose, in terms of how it makes the scene flow, and its intention (misdirection, distraction).
It's not lazy, it's just a different goal than you might have in mind. It's playing with audience expectation, and maybe you didn't like it, but my audience sure as hell loved it. It's also important from a character perspective because he's finally got the upper hand on Bane and, mirroring Bane and Talia's original plan to watch him fail, he's doing the same, telling Bane he's going to make him watch his own plan fail.
Bane and Talia’s plan was to torture him and his city. That’s what “When Gotham is in ashes, then you have my permission to die” means. Not “We’re going to defeat you.” What they were doing to him went well beyond "defeat".
I don’t see how Batman repeating Bane’s lines in an action movie cliché/staple is “playing with audience expectation”. It’s the most expected trope in an action movie for a hero to repeat something a villain said to them earlier in the film, or to say some variation of “I’m going to kill you” during a final confrontation.
I don’t dislike it beyond the fact that it just isn’t that interesting, and kind of sends the wrong message about a Batman who supposedly doesn’t execute people. I just don’t think it’s anything particularly clever.
And the whole argument was that the call and response dialogue in this film is lazy compared to the previous two films, in which call and response dialogue generally had more meaning and better insertion into the films. Not just that this particular line is lazy as a piece of writing.
To be honest, in general, I think “call and response” dialogue IS some of the laziest writing that can be done, whether it has deeper meaning or not. I don't know why anyone would consider it truly clever. It’s just so cliché and "formulaic" an approach to handling character interaction/resolutions.