And I didn't say that you did....I was reminding you not to it in the future, because at the moment you are getting a little exciteable in your posting and I don't want you to go over board.
Why not? I thought this wasn't Hitler territory right?
Whenever someone tries to compare the staff on here trying to maintain civility to the actions of mass murdering baby killing rapists.....I shake my head, take a deep breath, and remember what I am dealing with before I continue.
Why can't someone share their opinion?
Your opinion can be shared....if it is civil and non offensively stated.
Im not saying it's right to call someone a ****e, or be insanely rude about it. But i should have the right to say that a post or a gif is ignorant, which could lead to a realistic discussion.
No, you do not have that right. Calling what someone posts as ignorant is rude. It leads to fights and name calling. If you can't express your dislike of something without going to the lowest route then I suggest you not post your dislike at all.
Or if i think their taste isn't that great because a film that they like has no redeeming qualities,
When you show me the document signed off by all the world's leaders that assign you the designation ARBITER OF THE WORLD'S TASTE...then you can do that. Until then you must post civilly on here.
the fact that we to sugarcoat it or bite our tongue is quite ridiculous. Again, all of this can be said without insulting their culture or whatever, it can be civil and strictly about their taste in movies. It really isn't the end of the world if two people disagree on their taste in movies.
Apparently it is the end of the world to you...because you keep saying that if someone has an opinion you don't agree with...you somehow feel the need to belittle them for it and call them names and call in question their intelligence for it.
I agree, it doesn't automatically make them ignorant fools because they have a different opinion. If you read my posts, i said clearly that Olsen can love Pfeiffer's Catwoman. But to say that she's the only one and it shouldn't be remade, even though Pfeiffer wasn't the first and wasn't that accurate.....yeaaah...it's a bit ignorant.
OR.....it could be that an actress is being interviewed, and out of the blue she is asked about the character Catwoman...and she makes a light hearted quick answer to it....she isn't writing a blog or college thesis on the subject, she isn't even having the time to ponder it and formulate her thoughts into a coherent fully thought out response on a comic book website....she is sitting in a room all day taking thousands of questions from dozens of reporters and then makes a quick lighthearted response to a question about a comic book character.....is it ignorance or is it just a flippant remark not meant to personally offend your sensitive sensabilities?
If someone thinks im ignorant for saying something, or i have bad taste in movies, i should be able to respond and defend my view or taste. Vice versa. This is what i mean by this forum being run by people who dont let people breathe.
And if you have spent any time on here actually reading what I have posted in the past....you would know that I have posted hundreds if not thousands of times....you are allowed to rebut any comment, you are allowed to discuss, debate, and argue any point....AS LONG AS IT I DONE CIVILLY.
