ThreadPool
Thank you, SHH
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2011
- Messages
- 1,208
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Haha! Exactly. This is gonna be fun to watch. 

Any review listed on RT has a likely chance of containing spoilers. The first review does have spoilers so proceed with caution unless you've already seen the film or don't care to be spoiled![]()
So I take it that he thinks MOS is pretty good, but not great.![]()
If he gave The Avengers the same rating, that means he thought it was also good, but not great?
If this is the case, then. . .
![]()
t:
Now 2 Fresh, 0 Rotten
Just read the last paragraph of his review. I don't get the impression that he loved it.![]()
I like a ton of movies that are 3/4 stars. no big deal, he liked it move on.
Yea, really. Now the critic has to "love" the movie? A favorable review is good enough.
Whatever problems Man of Steel has - and it has enough to keep it from being a cohesively great movie - it has enough good to make it a must-see. Like I said up top, a couple of thousand words ago, this is the Superman movie weve been waiting to see. The fact that it leaves room for improvement only makes me more excited for the next one.
MAN OF STEEL was still way better than this yr's other summer tentpoles IRON MAN 3 and STAR TREK 2. I'm all for Snyder returning for sequel.