TMOS Reviews Thread - Non Spoiler Review and Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Too Sci-Fi" :funny:
It's fine if it's not their type of movie, but you would think people would know the movie is about ALIENS.
 
Too sci-fi?? thats like saying POTC is too piratey lol.
 
Maybe that reviewer that compared it to ID4 is kind of true
 
Tyler Fetterman

8 hours ago near San Jose, CA via Mobile

Just finished watching MAN OF STEEL!!!! I know I say this about most superhero movies but this is seriously one of the greatest films I have ever seen. And this is coming from a guy who is not a Superman fan. This film to find a new level of action. The cinematography was gorgeous. The writing was great. The story was intense. The acting was awesome. I haven't been so intensely happy since the Avengers. In fact......I'll say it. Something I never thought I'd ever say. MAN OF STEEL IS BETTER THAN THE AVENGERS!!!! This movie made me a Superman fan.
 
I've been wanting a Superman movie that explores the spacey/science fiction stuff in more detail. Bats is low level grit, Supes is mythology. 'Too sci-fi' is a big plus to me.
 
I've been wanting a Superman movie that explores the spacey/science fiction/fantasy stuff in more detail. Bats is low level grit, Supes is mythology. 'Too sci-fi' is a big plus to me.


Same and same.
 
I've been wanting a Superman movie that explores the spacey/science fiction stuff in more detail. Bats is low level grit, Supes is mythology. 'Too sci-fi' is a big plus to me.

Yep, and I love that they decided to spend more time on Krypton in this movie :D
 
Superhero movies are usually Sci-Fi.....

Wrong again... sci-fi is based on 'real science' and speculated into the far future.. like Star Trek.

Superhero movies are mostly Fantasy... where everything is totally made up of smoke... Like Star Wars.. that's fantasy as well..

There's a difference... one has the potential to come true, the other, not... one deals in 'magic' and 'whatever you can think up'... the other requires a strong foundation in 'science'... most sci-fis are written by scientists..
 
Wrong again... sci-fi is based on 'real science' and speculated into the far future.. like Star Trek.

Superhero movies are mostly Fantasy... where everything is totally made up of smoke... Like Star Wars.. that's fantasy as well..

There's a difference... one has the potential to come true, the other, not... one deals in 'magic' and 'whatever you can think up'... the other requires a strong foundation in 'science'... most sci-fis are written by scientists..

I disagree.

Star Wars IS Sci-Fi and a lot of superhero movies have Sci-Fi elements, they do not simply depend on "fantasy and magic". Even Thor tried to be scientific.
 
Tyler Fetterman

8 hours ago near San Jose, CA via Mobile

Just finished watching MAN OF STEEL!!!! I know I say this about most superhero movies but this is seriously one of the greatest films I have ever seen. And this is coming from a guy who is not a Superman fan. This film to find a new level of action. The cinematography was gorgeous. The writing was great. The story was intense. The acting was awesome. I haven't been so intensely happy since the Avengers. In fact......I'll say it. Something I never thought I'd ever say. MAN OF STEEL IS BETTER THAN THE AVENGERS!!!! This movie made me a Superman fan.

Awwwwwww yea.
 
Yep, and I love that they decided to spend more time on Krypton in this movie :D
Agreed. And I also mean stuff like regular size keys being carved out of dwarf stars and weighing half a million tons - only Superman can lift it.
 
Wrong again... sci-fi is based on 'real science' and speculated into the far future.. like Star Trek.

Superhero movies are mostly Fantasy... where everything is totally made up of smoke... Like Star Wars.. that's fantasy as well..

There's a difference... one has the potential to come true, the other, not... one deals in 'magic' and 'whatever you can think up'... the other requires a strong foundation in 'science'... most sci-fis are written by scientists..

You're looking at an old text book edition. It's hard to think that fantasy includes Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, Game of Throne, Pirates of the Caribbean, and then...the out of place Star Wars.

Doctor Who is considered to be sci-fi and that probably can't 'exist'. Buck Rogers..Flash Gordon..John Carter?

There is many 'sun genres' too. Hard Sci-fi is probably what you're talking about.
 
I disagree.

Star Wars IS Sci-Fi and a lot of superhero movies have Sci-Fi elements, they do not simply depend on "fantasy and magic". Even Thor tried to be scientific.

You can disagree all you like... but facts are facts... I grow up reading science fiction, and probably read over a 1000 books by now...

Here's the definition of science fiction:

Science fiction is a genre of fiction with imaginative but more or less plausible content such as settings in the future, futuristic science and technology, space travel, parallel universes, aliens, and paranormal abilities. Exploring the consequences of scientific innovations is one purpose of science fiction, making it a "literature of ideas".[1] Science fiction has been used by authors as a device to discuss philosophical ideas such as identity, desire, morality, and social structure.
Science fiction is largely based on writing rationally about alternative possible worlds or futures.[2] It is similar to, but differs from fantasy in that, within the context of the story, its imaginary elements are largely possible within scientifically established or scientifically postulated laws of nature (though some elements in a story might still be pure imaginative speculation).

Superman doesn't have any scientific basis to it (even the slightest to any of his powers)... Just because something is 'space oriented, or alien in origin' does not make it plausible... or sci-fi for that matter... You can write a story about dragons and wizards fighting it out in 'space' and that doesn't make it sci-fi...

And yup, Star Wars is Fantasy:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0076759/

It's genre is : Action, Adventure, Fantasy...


ps: If Superman had kept to leaping tall buildings, slightly stronger than a regular person, etc, because of the stronger gravitional field that Kryptonians lived on, then sure, that's sci-fi... but superman have evolved into pure fantasy...
 
Last edited:
It's fantasy... with aliens... it's sci-fantasy
 
Tyler Fetterman

8 hours ago near San Jose, CA via Mobile

Just finished watching MAN OF STEEL!!!! I know I say this about most superhero movies but this is seriously one of the greatest films I have ever seen. And this is coming from a guy who is not a Superman fan. This film to find a new level of action. The cinematography was gorgeous. The writing was great. The story was intense. The acting was awesome. I haven't been so intensely happy since the Avengers. In fact......I'll say it. Something I never thought I'd ever say. MAN OF STEEL IS BETTER THAN THE AVENGERS!!!! This movie made me a Superman fan.

I know people say Green Lantern got positive buzz early on but no one was saying stuff like this about GL, that's for sure. :woot:

(excluding the Avengers-related praise since that movie came out years later)
 
You're looking at an old text book edition. It's hard to think that fantasy includes Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, Game of Throne, Pirates of the Caribbean, and then...the out of place Star Wars.

Doctor Who is considered to be sci-fi and that probably can't 'exist'. Buck Rogers..Flash Gordon..John Carter?

There is many 'sun genres' too. Hard Sci-fi is probably what you're talking about.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0076759/

Genre: Fantasy..

Check-Mate
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"