I didn't understand you were writing your own version. Ecuse me if I've been harsh.
As I always say!

I didn't understand you were writing your own version. Ecuse me if I've been harsh.

what stories?
I am surprised that none of the sites which reported on the script updated their reports to say that the script was a fake following yesterday's revelations.
The stories in the Arkham games are very generic, and Origins is the only one with any kind of remarkable characterization. I think the only reason the story is praised is because of the atmosphere built (which is superb), because the plots themselves are of little note.
There's a lot of inspiration that can be taken from them visually, though.
I didn't think Origin's story was that much better, it just wasn't as convoluted as the others. It was much more streamlined. Other than that, it had the same beats.
Knight actually looks to be as convoluted as AA and AC. We'll see, though.....
I didn't think Origin's story was that much better, it just wasn't as convoluted as the others. It was much more streamlined. Other than that, it had the same beats.
Knight actually looks to be as convoluted as AA and AC. We'll see, though.....
Dini helped them write Asylum and City![]()
Agreed. The only thing that was better in Origins, was how they handled Bane. But his characterization wasn't even that great, he was just used as a repeating boss, whereas with the other, there were multiple bosses strewn throughout, instead of just focusing on one.Just curious, what do y'all think was the big problem with characterization in AA and AC? The only characters they completely botched were Bane and Two-Face, imo.
I don't see how the Origins story was thaaat much better. The whole Batman/Joker relationship was nicely done, as well as the Bruce/Alfred banter, but nothing else really stood out to me.