xXCosmicCutieXx
Civilian
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2016
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 1
Well I watch the tv series but is there anything from the comics?
What comic is Arrow based off of?
What comic is Arrow based off of?
If MOS is anything to go by, those characters would be better off on Arrow. Lets wait to see how BvS does first before we talk about anyone making an "excellent" villain in any of those films. "Excellent" is not a word that I would use to describe anything in MOS.
Zod and Faora were great,I sincerely doubt Arrow could do anything half as good with them. I'm not even a MOS fan but what exactly does Arrow does so right that MOS got wrong? they atleast treated their lead female with respect. You know something is wrong when Felicity Smoak is a bigger character than Black Canary.
I want him to be a Batman or JL villain as that's what he is,I dont want the character to be in a tangle of rights which would ensue should Arrow choose to use him. There is another villain like him in Onomatopoeia,he's the better choice.
Some villains I need them to introduce in S5:
Red Dart:
![]()
http://comicvine.gamespot.com/prometheus/4005-22784/
This entire family:
![]()
Creote and Savant:
![]()
KGB assassins

Arrow has been received much more warmly by fans than MOS, despite having far less resources at its disposal. It has not received as much praise as Daredevil, but it is respected and viewed as a good show and one of the very best Superhero shows (and by a lot of people as the best). MOS in comparison has received a mixed reception by fans and critics and is not viewed as one of the best Superhero movies, or even close to it. Arrow has been more of a success than MOS was, despite having less resources at its disposal and being on a network that forces it to focus a lot on drama and relationships. It has done far more right than MOS has done. Arrow has created a whole universe because people wanted more. Nobody cared enough about MOS getting a sequel and they had to force Batman into the movie (and have his name in the title) to keep the universe going.
Because they have plenty of characters that they can use and don't have to pull exclusively from Batman.

They dont?
Merlyn, Count Vertigo, Sportsmaster, Chesire, Lady Shiva, Onomatopoeia, China White, Komodo, Cupid, DC has a whole library of villains that aren't Batman villains.
He's saying they don't pull exclusively from Batman's rogues gallery.
Why do people care what villain originally belonged to which character originally? Because it's an alternate universe than the comics and regardless, heroes fight other character's villains all the time. As long as they have an interesting story in mind, shouldn't we just be excited that these characters are getting more exposure?
But Batman has the greatest rogue gallery in comics and Ollie is a similar character so I forgive em.
Why do people care what villain originally belonged to which character originally? Because it's an alternate universe than the comics and regardless, heroes fight other character's villains all the time. As long as they have an interesting story in mind, shouldn't we just be excited that these characters are getting more exposure?
Well I watch the tv series but is there anything from the comics?
What comic is Arrow based off of?
I heard they were changing the name of the show next season to Overwatch