• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Comics ASM #549 (Spoilers)

It's blatantly assuming readers are dumb asses.

"Look! We are giving him problems! Look! Problems! You liked a lot of these years ago! remember! Problems! Spidey has them!"

It's like when John Byrne re did the orgin story. Like, every issue was like a cock slap to the face with it's "SPIDEY'S ORGIN HAS CHANGED! WE DID THIS, DEAL WITH IT!"

It's lazy ass writing at it's best and insulting readers intelligence at it's worst.

It feels like it's been ages since Spider-man's had any real life problems, and I don't think it's an insult to the reader who's been picking up the book for the very first time.
 
Another great issue! Especially loving how seamless the change-over from creative teams feels. They nailed it. :cwink: :up:

Picking up on a few things from what some other posters have said:

I don't Dexter Bennet is really Menace. The brain-trust have already pulled off that trick with Mr. Negative/Li. Although i've no idea at this stage as to else it could be. But I am expecting Menace to be a younger foe.

Also, regarding the changing of Lily Hollister's hair colour... I don't get it. In all my issues she's had blonde hair and dark skin. But I did notice that in the latest issue Carlie Cooper's hair has changed from red to now a light brown!!

All in all. Loving Spidey. Loving Brand New Day.

Oh one more thing! Anyone else notice how in some preview images Larroca's Spider-Man had the movie costume's raised webbing?? But in the final product it's standard comic version?
 
Also, regarding the changing of Lily Hollister's hair colour... I don't get it. In all my issues she's had blonde hair and dark skin.

Yeah, you're right, but... in fact, in the first issues, Lily seemed to be of "white" origin with a really tanned skin, while now she seems to be more of "black" origin with blonde hair... I think it must be due to differences between the artists...
 
It feels like it's been ages since Spider-man's had any real life problems,
A valid point, no doubt, but...


and I don't think it's an insult to the reader who's been picking up the book for the very first time.
I do (well, maybe not a NEW reader, I guess, i dunno) because they are being so blatant with it. They are almost spoon feeding us. It's almost like they are in a hurry to show us all the problems that can arise from this new scenario.

Just take your time guys.....if you think your'e gonna stick with it (pleasenopleasenopleaseno :) ) what's your rush?
 
Yeah, you're right, but... in fact, in the first issues, Lily seemed to be of "white" origin with a really tanned skin, while now she seems to be more of "black" origin with blonde hair... I think it must be due to differences between the artists...
Her dad is black ain't he?
 
Also, regarding the changing of Lily Hollister's hair colour... I don't get it. In all my issues she's had blonde hair and dark skin. But I did notice that in the latest issue Carlie Cooper's hair has changed from red to now a light brown!!

I really didn't notice any differences with Lily's hair either, but I noticed the most recent issue was darker then what I saw on the internet, perhaps the colors vary when they're printed.

Oh one more thing! Anyone else notice how in some preview images Larroca's Spider-Man had the movie costume's raised webbing?? But in the final product it's standard comic version?

I noticed that also, I think it was the artists having some fun.:yay:
 
I was kinda hoping he was gonna stick to the movie style, make it look more realistic, oh well.
 
I don't Dexter Bennet is really Menace. The brain-trust have already pulled off that trick with Mr. Negative/Li. Although i've no idea at this stage as to else it could be. But I am expecting Menace to be a younger foe.

Well, I'm leaning more towards the idea that, while Dexter Bennet ISN'T Menace, he DOES have a working relationship with him, in that Menace, whoever he/she is, commits crime and mayhem and, in return, Bennet can get exclusive footage of him/her in action in order to sell more papers. This of course, sets up a contrast between how Peter took pictures of himself as Spidey and sold them to an unknowing Jameson who then used them to tarnish Spidey's reputation, and Bennet purposefully in league with a villain in order to achieve the same result. And of course, Bennet can't back out of his deal with Menace because then he becomes implicated as an accomplice to a criminal. At least, that's what I think Marvel is shooting for.

Also, regarding the changing of Lily Hollister's hair colour... I don't get it. In all my issues she's had blonde hair and dark skin. But I did notice that in the latest issue Carlie Cooper's hair has changed from red to now a light brown!!
Well, there goes the notion Carlie's Jackpot then, since her hair color was used as "evidence" for her being Jackpot. Unless of course Carlie loves dying her hair on a regular basis. After all, it was BLOND when we first saw her in ASM #545.

Oh one more thing!
Anyone else notice how in some preview images Larroca's Spider-Man had the movie costume's raised webbing?? But in the final product it's standard comic version?

Chalk it up to Marvel using those preview pages as a "bait and switch" to try and attract those who were only familiar with Spidey via the movies.
 
Well, I'm leaning more towards the idea that, while Dexter Bennet ISN'T Menace, he DOES have a working relationship with him, in that Menace, whoever he/she is, commits crime and mayhem and, in return, Bennet can get exclusive footage of him/her in action in order to sell more papers. This of course, sets up a contrast between how Peter took pictures of himself as Spidey and sold them to an unknowing Jameson who then used them to tarnish Spidey's reputation, and Bennet purposefully in league with a villain in order to achieve the same result. And of course, Bennet can't back out of his deal with Menace because then he becomes implicated as an accomplice to a criminal. At least, that's what I think Marvel is shooting for.

That's actually a pretty interesting theory.:up:

Well, there goes the notion Carlie's Jackpot then, since her hair color was used as "evidence" for her being Jackpot. Unless of course Carlie loves dying her hair on a regular basis. After all, it was BLOND when we first saw her in ASM #545.

I don't think Carlie should be a suspect, considering we get into Jackpot's thoughts in her short story in BND #1 about her supposedly doing the modeling thing. Unfortunately another hint at her being MJ.


Chalk it up to Marvel using those preview pages as a "bait and switch" to try and attract those who were only familiar with Spidey via the movies.

Possibly, but I believe it has more to do with Larocca saying he loved drawing the *movie* Spider-man.
 
Well, I'm leaning more towards the idea that, while Dexter Bennet ISN'T Menace, he DOES have a working relationship with him, in that Menace, whoever he/she is, commits crime and mayhem and, in return, Bennet can get exclusive footage of him/her in action in order to sell more papers. This of course, sets up a contrast between how Peter took pictures of himself as Spidey and sold them to an unknowing Jameson who then used them to tarnish Spidey's reputation, and Bennet purposefully in league with a villain in order to achieve the same result. And of course, Bennet can't back out of his deal with Menace because then he becomes implicated as an accomplice to a criminal. At least, that's what I think Marvel is shooting for.

Well, there goes the notion Carlie's Jackpot then, since her hair color was used as "evidence" for her being Jackpot. Unless of course Carlie loves dying her hair on a regular basis. After all, it was BLOND when we first saw her in ASM #545.




Perhaps she's wearing a wig?
 
Chalk it up to Marvel using those preview pages as a "bait and switch" to try and attract those who were only familiar with Spidey via the movies.

I thought that's exactly what they were doing, and if so: Bravo! I would applaud them for finally taking advantage of what the movies bring to the table.
 
I don't think Carlie should be a suspect, considering we get into Jackpot's thoughts in her short story in BND #1 about her supposedly doing the modeling thing. Unfortunately another hint at her being MJ.

Well I never considered Carlie as being Jackpot, either, since I think that was an attempt by some to try and convince themselves that it's too obvious for MJ to be Jackpot to be true. But like I said earlier, I don't think Marvel is even trying to hide the idea that MJ is Jackpot. Question is HOW did she become Jackpot. And as for the obvious question, it was also obvious that the new Captain America would be Bucky, and that the Red Hulk would be Rick Jones. It was even obvious that "One More Day" was going to be used to undo the marriage and that Mephisto would be the catalyst. Jackpot being MJ I think falls into the same category.

Possibly, but I believe it has more to do with Larocca saying he loved drawing the *movie* Spider-man.

Which I can understand, considering how I actually like the movie version of the red and blues over the classic one (Stillanerd braces for the barrage of verbal tomatoes and boos.:woot:).
 
Right, just as Joe taunted us for years and beloowed out with what he was gonna do with the marriage, and some thought it was all just a "curveball"....yet it wasn't at all....and it's just as so with MJ being a superhero now..i think it is pretty straight forward.

I mean, if not, it is kinda corny to have some 'other girl' using ALL her catch phrases and dressing like her.
 
Which I can understand, considering how I actually like the movie version of the red and blues over the classic one (Stillanerd braces for the barrage of verbal tomatoes and boos.:woot:).

I don't know if I prefer the movie over the classic, but I do prefer the movie Spider-emblem on the back and chest to the classic! The movie emblem on the back is just wicked!! The classic version looks like a tick.
 
I don't know if I prefer the movie over the classic, but I do prefer the movie Spider-emblem on the back and chest to the classic! The movie emblem on the back is just wicked!! The classic version looks like a tick.

Boooooooooooooooo.... :cmad: :cmad: :cmad:

**throws rotten tomatoes at shinlyle**

:yay:
 
I don't know if I prefer the movie over the classic, but I do prefer the movie Spider-emblem on the back and chest to the classic! The movie emblem on the back is just wicked!! The classic version looks like a tick.

Absolutely, and that's one of the main reasons why I prefer the movie one over the classic (although the "tick" emblem on the back certainly looks better than some of Ditko's earlier designs of the back emblem.) BTW, Shin, thanks for being my human shield for TMOB "wrath." :cwink:
 
I don't know if I prefer the movie over the classic, but I do prefer the movie Spider-emblem on the back and chest to the classic! The movie emblem on the back is just wicked!! The classic version looks like a tick.

Even though I like the "tick" :woot: I agree it is kind of odd looking. I believe in the first couple of issues of Amazing Ditko drew it as a spider, perhaps he changed it because it was easier to draw.:huh: The movie costume is definitely sharp looking. :up:
 
This was more of a modern and realistic take on Spidey (Dan Slott's arc was pure classic Spidey from start to finish). I like the change of style, but I like Slott's more active, energetic, and stan lee-ish take on the book.

AMAZING 546
Story: 4/5
Art: 4.5/5

AMAZING 547
Story: 3.5/5
Art: 4.5/5

AMAZING 548
Story: 4/5
Art: 4.5/5

AMAZING 549
STORY: 3.5 stars
ART: 3.5 stars
 
I don't know if I prefer the movie over the classic, but I do prefer the movie Spider-emblem on the back and chest to the classic! The movie emblem on the back is just wicked!! The classic version looks like a tick.

Dare I say it, I was always iffy on it, even as a kid!

*wolvie2020 uses his Spidey sense to dodge smelly eggs*
 
This was more of a modern and realistic take on Spidey (Dan Slott's arc was pure classic Spidey from start to finish). I like the change of style, but I like Slott's more active, energetic, and stan lee-ish take on the book.

AMAZING 546
Story: 4/5
Art: 4.5/5

AMAZING 547
Story: 3.5/5
Art: 4.5/5

AMAZING 548
Story: 4/5
Art: 4.5/5

AMAZING 549
STORY: 3.5 stars
ART: 3.5 stars

I agree. And I usually enjoy his art.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,262
Messages
22,074,447
Members
45,876
Latest member
kedenlewis
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"