Clark-Kent
I don't need glasses
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2015
- Messages
- 4,459
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
We know too muchI really don't want to know your fantasies jaymes.![]()
We know too muchI really don't want to know your fantasies jaymes.![]()
Ever since TDK, Bale's voice has been horrible. I still think the worst is after he captured The Joker.
"DIZZ SURTY, JUST SHOULD YOU, THAT ITZ FURL OF PURPLE, READY TO BURWEVE IN GURRRRD"
![]()
Ask Talia's death scene, she'll tell you.![]()
Same 5 o'clock shadow and everything.
I really don't want to know your fantasies jaymes.![]()
We know too much![]()

I've been meaning to ask you or another fan of the character: When exactly did "the scruffy" look for Batman originate in the comics? To clarify, I'm not referring to the times when his lack of grooming was the result of some disability incurred in the line of duty. When did it first become kind of commonplace for him to be depicted that way? I'm guessing it started with All Star Batman & Robin, the Boy Wonder.
That's where I thought it all started too. And I thought the talk of it was brought up especially with Affleck playing a Frank Miller inspired Batman.
In Year One, he sports a mustache![]()
Yeah, that's when I first noticed DC pushing that look for the character. In other instances prior to ASB&R, there was usually some reason -- stress, disability, etc. -- for it being there. Then, following the release of All Star, "the scruffy" was almost ubiquitous. You'd see it in other comics, the Arkham games, and now a live-action movie.
Seems like it. And I like it.
Yes, that's one good thing about All Star: the art.

Yes. And the "scruffy" translates well on screen.
![]()
Visually yes, he's the Batman. He's Bruce Wayne. It's pretty cool. But it all means nothing until we see his performance. A few clips as of now doesn't tell us the answer, yet. And if he really is fantastic, and these movies turn out meh, that will be frustrating because the wait for a solo film will feel longer for me.
I dont know about all of you guys, but as a Batman fan first and foremost, i would have preferred this Batman in a new trilogy instead of what we're getting. Ill feel shafted if he only does like 1 solo film and 4 team-ups with Snyder. That would be a waste of a great Batman imo. It's like yeaaah we got the Batman from the comics (not jumping to this conclusion yet of course) but he only did 1 real Batman movie! Man that would suck.
Indeed, it does.
I still remember when many of us would have discussions about the look when the film was still in the early stages of production. I never thought Snyder would actually go for that, though. It just goes to show what a true fan of the character he is.
Like you Shauner, I definitely want to see more of this Batman in more than just one solo movie if he turns out to be as good and interesting as I expect him to be. But I can't imagine Affleck will work on a trilogy. He's going to want to invest in other projects probably. Just my thinking. And like you say also, it ultimately depends on his schedule.
I said it before and I'll say it again - I always thought that scruffy look works great for Batman and I'm glad they went with it.
the 5 o'clock shadow was a must for me and I still can't believe they did it
just gives him that rugged toughness