My bad, I let my other argument bleed into yours, roach. Regardless, it sounds like people outside know about the country... that makes sense. When earlier you said no one knows anything about it, but it's got all this prosperity from interacting with people, it's like... hmmm...
Unless the lawyer plays into the story, it may not be a good idea to include.
Yes people would know about Wakanda but thats about it....much like the country of Tanzania. We know it's a country in Africa but without looking it up on the internet what could you tell me about it. Now imagine if that country purposefully hid info about it.
That has really worked out well for North Korea, eh?
I wrote this in another thread but this is a little plot of what I thought for a Black Panther film
Black Panther - Set in a mix of Wakanda and New York. Origins of Black Panther are explored in depth. Explains Wakanda and it's lore. BP faces Ape-Man. In the mix BP goes to New York and breaks into Tony Stark's lab and plants a virus in his system. He then makes himself known so Iron Man can come after him in Wakanda. There they fight and BP activates the virus rendering Tony's suit useless. Having defeated Iron Man he offers BP a shot on the team after realizing BP is not a villain. Leads in to Avengers 3.
What do you guys think?
But it is. The MCU uses WW2, New York and other real places. They have made it a point throughout the comics to use real places and insert their characters in our world.
No one is saying Wakanda won't exist in some form, what we are saying is that Wakanda needs to be semi-believable in a modern world otherwise the place looks like fantasy land on Earth. Is Asgard believable on Earth? No, why should Wakanda be? Because that's what the comics say? The comics say all sorts of things and the films don't stick to that material perfectly anyway.
We are trying to fix huge holes in Wakanda's history so that we can make a compelling story for Black Panther within that world. BP is informed by his homeland, and if that isn't remotely believable it takes away from the character and no one wants that.
The MCU featured a World War 2 that had a Nazi with a red skull for a head, technology far more superior than anything at the time on both Stark and Hydra's end, and vibranium being pretty much indestructible. In modern day they have a giant hellicarrier that's basically a submarine and flying ship, and no one knew a damn thing about it. Wakanda isn't that far fetched when you consider that the SHIELD has a giant floating ship that no one has seen, even Tony Stark who had the most advanced tech of them all. In this world it's not so far fetched that a place like Wakanda could exist without much contact from outsiders.
It's the super advanced world with no contact from outsiders that is hard to believe. Wakanda cannot achieve the level of sophistication that some folks are arguing for, by themselves. The modern world has achieved what it has through trade and an exchange of ideas. To say a country who has stayed apart from the rest of the world achieved even greater achievement faster than the rest of the collective world is a bridge too far. Couple that with being super small, landlocked with few human and natural resources, and they're lucky they can make a toaster, let alone giant laser cannons.
The United States, Europe, Japan and other advanced nations would not be where they are without each other. An advanced Wakanda cannot exist without the rest of the world as Wakanda does not possess the resources it would need to be advanced by itself.
I can believe Asgard in space, I cannot believe Asgard on Earth and that's the problem. You can make fantastic, unbelievable worlds in space because it doesn't play by the same rules as Earth does. An unbelievable Wakanda only works to undermine Black Panther, not make him better. I won't walk out of Black Panther, I just won't see it.
But it's not our universe...it's the MCU....they had lazer beams and arc cannons in WW2, a man in a cave can build a sophisticated suit or armor....he has an AI house...now imagine Tony Stark's ingenuity expressed on a country level.
Then they would take over the world, but I bet you have a really good way of explaining that away too.
What you guys want is for Wakanda to be an outlier to an extreme degree. Let's bring it back down a bit so that it actually works.
And let's stop comparing Wakanda to GoTG. If Wakanda was populated by talking raccoons you wouldn't believe it either.
So how do you know Tony fans (much of the audience) won't be like "T'Challa's a ______ for that. Tony didn't do anything to him."
I don't think a BP film should co-star Iron Man. He needs to be established on his own (not counting possible cameos).
They are isolationists...they want to be left alone. Why would they want to take over the world?
But why should Wakanda be toned down....nothing else in the MCU has?
The thing about Panther is he's always been the guy to test the other characters. Add in the aspect that Black Panther is testing Tony to see if he's worthy of helping him and if so then he's also going to help him. In the end it would benefit him and Tony if Panther dies this.
It wouldn't be co-staring Iron Man. If they wanted they could make the "Iron Man arc" the last 20-30 minute third act of the film. It's a way to introduce BP to the rest of the MCU in a unconventional but perfect character fitting way.
I would keep IM out of it. BP needs to flex on his own...if there has to be a cameo maybe Fury or Cap
I say use IM because so far IM is kind of like the center to the MCU. As of now most people see him and the smartest guy in the MCU. Having Panther come and show him up like he does in the comics is a perfect way to introduce his intellect to the audience and it'd just be cool as heck to see Panther defeat Iron Man