Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]452173[/split]
I would like to see this order:
Trinity (Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman team first team-up)
WW Solo Origin
Justice League (JL established and recruits other members)
" A decision's being made, I'm sure, post opening weekend!"
Here's what Cavill said about JL in an interview about MoS:
Only for something else to happen and get WB all scared of what to do and change their minds.
Here's what Cavill said about JL in an interview about MoS:
Rebooting the VERY successful Nolan Batman film franchise within 3 years after that particular Trilogy ends?
The general movie going public will be confused.....big time!
Spidey didn't even do it that quick.
Well, with the Spider-Man franchise they were going to go with a sequel, but when the Rami/MacGuire team bid too high they decided to reboot. Had they made that decision sooner, I feel they would have made The Amazing Spiderman sooner since making money has no holding period. I don't think the public would have been confused since we knew from the start the the film was going to be a reboot (it's not like people don't read the news).
When and where did this interview take place?
How successful (financially) was Webbs Spidey films ahead of Raimis films?
Granted the 3rd Raimi Spidey film was terrible also.
WB's better hire Aronofsky or possibly R Johnson for the eventual reboot if they are going to have a chance of not embarrassing themselves.
It's best to reboot Batman 5 to 7 years after the last movie, and in his own solo film. With no origin. But a young Batman. Now when i say young Batman, that could mean Bruce Wayne (2nd year or so after his debut) or Terry McGinnis (2nd year or so after his debut).Rebooting the VERY successful Nolan Batman film franchise within 3 years after that particular Trilogy ends?
The general movie going public will be confused.....big time!
Spidey didn't even do it that quick.
Well, with the Spider-Man franchise they were going to go with a sequel, but when the Rami/MacGuire team bid too high they decided to reboot.
It's best to reboot Batman 5 to 7 years after the last movie, and in his own solo film. With no origin. But a young Batman. Now when i say young Batman, that could mean Bruce Wayne (2nd year or so after his debut) or Terry McGinnis (2nd year or so after his debut).
That was NOT the reason why Sony rebooted the Spider-Man franchise. The producers wouldn't give Raimi creative freedom (which he earned since those three films made a pretty penny for Sony and Marvel Entertainment), and Raimi decided to leave to avoid a repeat of Spider-Man 3.
I'm sick of people acting like "well, Raimi was getting too expensive and SM-3 was awful, that's why they rebooted". I guarantee you guys that if the producers (aka Avi Arad and Laura Ziskin) had let Raimi have creative control for Spider-Man 4 -- he would've likely deferred his usual big upfront payment in order to make the film he wanted. There would be no Amazing Spider-Man, we would've had two more Raimi Spider-man movies.
Except that Tobey really didn't seem to want to do it either. No starring actor, no movie.