I knew we wouldn't get anything of substance. But reusing the same art and trying to pass it off as new? That's lazy You can call me a troll or hater or whatever. It's just lazy.
Doesn't Quicksilver have white hair in the comics because of Magneto? Is that the reason Marvel can't give him white hair?
I don't get why you think they're trying to pass off the old art as new. They're not reusing images that hardly anyone saw or that can be easily forgotten or weren't all over the place lol. And have you seen much concept art/pre-vis? Check your DVDs/blu-ray extras or get a making-of book to a sci-fi/fantasy/superhero film (sequel). That should stop these embarrassing assertions.You people can call me a troll all you want. Reusing the same art for a new movie and likely trying to pass it off as "new" is lazy.
I don't think you are whining. I completely get you here. I just think that if we don't see the hair at some point, I don't think it will be because they didn't try.
I knew we wouldn't get anything of substance. But reusing the same art and trying to pass it off as new? That's lazy You can call me a troll or hater or whatever. It's just lazy.
In the comics 70's QS and modern day QS look relatively the same.In Dofp quicksilver is in the 70's
In the Avengers 2 Quicksilver is in the present day
Okay I must be crazy because I know I will be shot for this.
In Dofp quicksilver is in the 70's
In the Avengers 2 Quicksilver is in the present day
So their costumes are never going to be similar.
Their personalities sound different especially with the time frames, so I dont personally get why people are comparing them. I get people want comic accurate characters but as of right now neither characters are exactly copied from page to screen and that is okay for me, but what if singer brings quicksilver back for apocalypse in the 80's makes him a member of the brotherhood and gives him a costume? I am not trying to cause anything bad but I have heard why people think it on the X-Men forums so thought I should check what peoples opinions are here.
IMHO it'd be better if Ultron took over the suit with Tony still inside. Would be more dramatic if Hulk has to take the suit down without harming Tony. Otherwise he could just tear it to piecesWhat makes you think Hulk is the "villain" in that fight....?
Could be that Hulkbuster is controlled by Ultron. Easy enough for him to hack any one (or all) of Tony's suits.
Hulkbuster might be the one on the rampage there, and Hulk is trying to stop him. (Or "it," if Tony isn't inside the suit.)
IMHO it'd be better if Ultron took over the suit with Tony still inside. Would be more dramatic if Hulk has to take the suit down without harming Tony. Otherwise he could just tear it to pieces
While I'm excited about the Hulkbuster, I'm kind of confused.
In Avengers, Banner loses control and attacks Black Widow and Thor.
Later on he says he's always angry and in control of Hulk for the final battle.
Now in Avengers 2, he loses control of Hulk.
Make up your mind Banner. Can you control it or not?
Standard practice is what it is. You seem dense.
Scarlet Witch costume is pretty lazy. One of the only Marvel Studio costumes (can we even call it that?) I have felt nothing for...Quicksilver however looks absolutely perfect.
In the comics 70's QS and modern day QS look relatively the same.
We can only hope.5 bucks says that's just her civilian outfit.
Scarlet Witch costume is pretty lazy. One of the only Marvel Studio costumes (can we even call it that?) I have felt nothing for...Quicksilver however looks absolutely perfect.