Are you serious?
Every Batmobile goes through walls and buildings.
So? It's one thing it did.
You didn't say "Did things that no other Batmobile does (spoiler, neither does The Tumbler, especially when compared to the comics mobiles)", and I never said no other Batmobile could do the things it does.
It didn't survive the parademons, they were wrecking it till the JL arrived.
Except that it did. They were starting to wreck it, but did not in fact, wreck it.
Survived a collison with Superman? Lol, he was just standing around.
And he's Superman.
It didn't fire missiles but yeah it had guns, guns and even more guns and a grapple line which I already mentioned.
Yes, it did fire missles, to clear a path through the large building right after Wonder Woman rescues him from the parademons.
It didn't have a leaping ability or an ejector seat. Please stick with what
was actually shown.
Maybe you should go watch the scenes in BVS and Justice League again. You are incorrect.
The vehicle wasn't shown to do anything beyond firing bullets and towing another car...
Look,the point is that the Snyder mobile did absolutely nothing. His vehicular action was garbage as hell. Remember that giant plane?all it did was shoot missiles.
I mean, it also carried him places rapidly, which is what Batman's planes are generally designed to do, and had remote piloting capability, so Alfred could fly it from the cave. We also saw Batman leap from the plane through a warehouse window. But hey, if you want to be reductionist, be reductionist.
The Batmobile is a product of that particular vision of Snyder. The Burton and Nolan cars played pivotal roles. The scenes they were used in were pivotal and tense. Rescuing Vicki, Penguin taking control, saving Rachel, blowing up the train tracks, etc. Snyder mobile shot thugs and parademons. In the end, that's all it did.
There were story reasons for the inclusion of the Snydermobile in BVS and Justice League, too. You don't have to like them as much as the chase sequences with the damsels in distress, but there are concrete story reasons for their inclusion.
No, that is not all it did, nor all it could do. You are talking about the quality of the movie in a discussion about the car itself. Which is relevant to a comparison of the films and the use of the cars, but when you make hyperbolic statements like "It didn't do anything but X", you confuse the issue.
I'm simply saying that story telling matters a lot. Burton and Nolan's cars are iconic because everything about their visions are iconic. These things dont exist in a vaccum.
Then simply say that. When you resort to using lazy shorthand like "It did nothing", again, you confuse the issue. Someone who cares about the quality of the film around the car should be able to be more articulate.[/quote]