I don't think it's very practical to create a whole mask which can perfectly position itself that close to the eyes and not risk severe misalignment during movements.I was pretty firmly against the idea of lenses being used in live action for a long time,but I've come around on the idea and think they could work if done properly.
I wouldn't want them to be something that's permanently positioned over his eyes,but rather something that can be retracted into the mask when they're not needed.
This could work IMO if they went with a mask similar to the one in Arkham city(Which I hope they do anyway...with or without the lenses) rather than the traditional black eye makeup look
![]()
See how the eye holes are just about the size of his actual eyes?
I can easily see lenses sliding down from inside the mask whenever he needs them for either tactical(Heat/night vision) or theatric reasons.
Sorry.If the head want so FAT I would agree with you.
Slightly off topic, IMHO the BB Bat-Suit is the best big screen Bat-Suit so far.
![]()
P/S Like TheFlamingCoco said the BB suit would have looked a lot cooler if it would have been black and gray instead of all black.
It makes him a bit too "super" and safe - he pretty much never has to worry about heights.
It kind of makes him Falcon or Condorman almost. That's not meant to be one of his abilities. It was pretty much invented by Nolan.
At the MOST the cape should be able to *barely* slow down a straight down fall from one story high.
Nope. Keaton had a glider cape in Batman Returns.
Nope. Keaton had a glider cape in Batman Returns.
If you watch the commentary for BR, Burton talks about how Nolan's TDKT was an inspiration for the glider. Shauner will tell ya.
What does the 2nd T in TDKT stand for?
If they had just made the cowl out of a different, darker shade of black material (since they supposedly ordered it from another company, why is it made out of the same stuff as the bodysuit he found at Wayne Enterprises?)
That always perplexes me. Also, what's he deal with that Batsymbol? Not only does it seem to be made of the same material as the suit underneath, it seems to be a molded part of it. Did Lucius foresee Bruce's mission years before, when he constructed the armour?
I couldn't have said it better!This, 1,000,000 times. The DK trilogy has it's strengths and weaknesses but falling short on the visual side is a cardinal sin for a hero character like Batman.
Every shot of the lead character in costume in the Marvel movies or Man OF Steel looks like a splash page. There's barely anything in Nolan's trilogy that fits that bill and what there is is fleeting.
To put it another way - I always thought Batman Begins would have been a movie I would actually loved if the leaked script (which I liked a bit better than the final one) had been directed by Zac Snyder. I felt that way before he did MOS.
The man knows how to do comic book visuals right, it IS his forte. There's no one better at it IMO.
So it's pretty great I actually get to see a Zac Snyder Batman and I didn't have to wait 10 or 20 years after Nolan to get it.
That always perplexes me. Also, what's he deal with that Batsymbol? Not only does it seem to be made of the same material as the suit underneath, it seems to be a molded part of it. Did Lucius foresee Bruce's mission years before, when he constructed the armour?
That always perplexes me. Also, what's he deal with that Batsymbol? Not only does it seem to be made of the same material as the suit underneath, it seems to be a molded part of it. Did Lucius foresee Bruce's mission years before, when he constructed the armour?
Now you guys are really grasping at straws to find "logic holes" in Nolans Batman movies. Nice effort.
You do realize Bruce tinkered with the suit? It's fair to say that the bat symbol came after Bruce received the suit from Fox.![]()