The Dark Knight Rises The TDKR General Discussion Thread - Part 127 (NO SPOILERS)

Status
Not open for further replies.
You didn't love Batman Begins and you think Nolan's greatest asset was Ledger.

Please just leave. :dry:

Are you denying that Ledger was the greatest asset of TDK and the biggest reason for its critical acclaim? I can point to a number of reviews that basically admit they think TDKR is weaker because it doesn't have Ledger's performance.
 
Are you mocking me? Seriously i thought the boards were more mature than this. This movie is really important to me that's why I'm freaking out

You're becoming depressed over a few negative reviews.

I thought the forums were more mature as well.
 
You didn't love Batman Begins and you think Nolan's greatest asset was Ledger.

Please just leave. :dry:

I think TDK is sloppily paced, has beats and subplots that exist for no real dramatic purpose (or at best tepid ones).

Should I leave?

Is that the thing here? People express opinions and then have to leave?
 
Are you mocking me? Seriously i thought the boards were more mature than this. This movie is really important to me that's why I'm freaking out

There's no need to freak out. Just relax and enjoy the movie.
 
QFT.

It's weird, I guess this is going to be a polarizing film after all.
That's what Drew said alright, but I suspect that was aimed more at the Bat fanbase.

Just finished watching B89. Surprised by how well Keaton's performance holds up, but Jack's Joker just feels too cartoonish compared with Heath's.
 
Tom_Shone

"Dark Knight Rises: structurally better than TDK, missing The Joker but gaining in majesty what it loses in levity"

Now see right here, this is a constructive and relevant way of looking at The Joker's and implicitly Ledger's absence in TDKR. The 'it's not as good as TDK because of the absence of the Joker' reasoning was getting quite tiring.
 
MmbPx.jpg
 
Like I said, I just skimmed it. That's a little encouraging, but it's still a negative score.

I honestly have a feeling Ebert isn't going to give it as positive of a review as we hope, if not a positive review at all. I don't know why exactly, but I certainly hope I'm proven wrong.

Since when is 2.5/4 a negative review? :doh:
 
Are you denying that Ledger was the greatest asset of TDK and the biggest reason for its critical acclaim? I can point to a number of reviews that basically admit they think TDKR is weaker because it doesn't have Ledger's performance.

Nah, just saying that Nolan's greatest asset in BB and TDKR was not Ledger. It's insulting to all the other actors.

I think TDK is sloppily paced, has beats and subplots that exist for no real dramatic purpose (or at best tepid ones).

Should I leave?

Is that the thing here? People express opinions and then have to leave?
:facepalm:

Not what I said at all. See above.
 
Like I said, I just skimmed it. That's a little encouraging, but it's still a negative score.

I honestly have a feeling Ebert isn't going to give it as positive of a review as we hope, if not a positive review at all. I don't know why exactly, but I certainly hope I'm proven wrong.

WB might have poisoned the well with Ebert when they pulled that embargo nonsense. As far as a 2.5/4 being negative, no it is not. Anything above 60% is considered positive unless the reviewer asks for it to be listed as negative. 2.5/4 is 62.5% and the words in the review are more positive than negative. But who knows, maybe he'll ask them to label it negative.
 
Are you mocking me? Seriously i thought the boards were more mature than this. This movie is really important to me that's why I'm freaking out

It's not right to mock people, no, but the way you've been reacting to a few negative reviews hasn't been mature. At all.
 
Are you mocking me? Seriously i thought the boards were more mature than this. This movie is really important to me that's why I'm freaking out
Its important to all of us otherwise we wouldnt be here. A couple negative reviews wont affect the publics opinion of the film and it shouldn't affect you the way it is.
 
The Prestige is a better film than TDK (or BB for that matter), and probably better than TDKR as well (still need to see TDKR before judging). So yeah, it's not like RT is perfect at judging the quality of films. Matter of fact, history is littered with films that weren't universally acclaimed at first but became more appreciated over time.

What's interesting to me about TDKR is the constant, I meant constant references to Ledger's Joker. Not even in the movie and still having an impact on this movie. I have to see it myself, but I'm not convinced it's getting an entirely fair shake if people are comparing it to TDK and wanting another Heath Joker. The Batman fans who have seen it seem to be gushing a lot of praise for the fact that it ties back in so well with BB. Critics might not give a damn about that aspect of it, but I sure do.

And the best film that Christopher Nolan ever made is still Memento. IMHO
 
I think TDK is sloppily paced, has beats and subplots that exist for no real dramatic purpose (or at best tepid ones).

Should I leave?

Is that the thing here? People express opinions and then have to leave?
That's right. Now get out. No room for discussion or difference of opinion here.
 
kv, that was priceless. Some people here really need to read this :up:
 
I don't appreciate all these users making fun of me.

It's kinda coming off like you're having a panic attack, bud. It's just a movie and reviews mean so very very little in the grand scheme of things. The general consensus is that TDKR is good, maybe even great. SOOOO my advice to you is to take it down a notch, and at 12:01am on Friday, sit back and enjoy the ride. It's just a movie. It's just a movie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,355
Messages
22,090,455
Members
45,886
Latest member
Elchido
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"