TheFlamingCoco
Avenger
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2013
- Messages
- 10,479
- Reaction score
- 16
- Points
- 33
^ IM2 was compromised. IM3 was better movie on a stand-alone basis, but an EVEN worse sequel than IM2.
Why are we posting this in here? A breakdown of some of the chronology of the movie is a spoiler!
Hence my use of spoiler tags. It was in response to a review someone posted. I suppose I could quote that review with my question in another thread? Which would you recommend?
A critical chat about MOS:
Sideswipe2674: With a actor like Henry Cavill, being Clark Kent
Sideswipe2674: youre a big handsome guy, and some characters that interact with Clark are lost on his size and charm. It didnt feel realistic.
Sideswipe2674: He definitely felt out of place as Clark Kent, but hes not the Clark Kent that we grew up knowing.
Sideswipe2674: Hes much more natural as Superman in this film.
EZP88: hahaha
Sideswipe2674: As slow as the story was, it made up for it with the action in the middle and end.
Sideswipe2674: The story lags in between, so I felt like pacing was off.
EZP88: So, you got a little bored after the first action scene?
Sideswipe2674: Yeah.
EZP88: How would you rank it with the rest of the blockbusters so far?
Sideswipe2674: Id rank it, Star Trek, Iron Man 3 then Superman.
EZP88: Really?
Sideswipe2674: Iron Man 3 has comedy, charm and personality.
EZP88: I thought Iron Man 3 was far behind Star Trek.
Sideswipe2674: Superman feels more serious.
EZP88: I think I liked Fast and Furious 6 more than Iron Man 3.
Sideswipe2674: Star Trek is way beyond all of them.
Sideswipe2674: MOS feels like a movie with potential, and thats the problem
Sideswipe2674: its still just a movie with potential.
Hence my use of spoiler tags. It was in response to a review someone posted. I suppose I could quote that review with my question in another thread? Which would you recommend?
Actually, I'm relieved to hear that he thought it "dragged" in the middle. From all the reports it was sounding like MOS was just wall-to-wall action, and I really want some of those quieter character-building moments to get a chance to breathe.
Also, not at all concerned about it having less "comedy and charm" because this is Superman - I WANT his story to be treated with more reverence and respect than your average superhero. I don't want him being apologized for, and a lot of times, I feel like the humor injected into recent CBM flicks (e.g. Thor, Iron Man, etc) is there to help the audience laugh at the inherently ridiculous aspects of the film. That shouldn't be the case with Supes. He should be more straightforward, seeing as he's the original mythmaker out of the bunch.
Actually, I'm relieved to hear that he thought it "dragged" in the middle. From all the reports it was sounding like MOS was just wall-to-wall action, and I really want some of those quieter character-building moments to get a chance to breathe.
Also, not at all concerned about it having less "comedy and charm" because this is Superman - I WANT his story to be treated with more reverence and respect than your average superhero. I don't want him being apologized for, and a lot of times, I feel like the humor injected into recent CBM flicks (e.g. Thor, Iron Man, etc) is there to help the audience laugh at the inherently ridiculous aspects of the film. That shouldn't be the case with Supes. He should be more straightforward, seeing as he's the original mythmaker out of the bunch.
^ It initially was untagged. And sorry for calling you dude. :/
General discussion or review and discussion thread (spoilers)
Sideswipe2674: With a actor like Henry Cavill, being Clark Kent, youre a big handsome guy, and some characters that interact with Clark are lost on his size and charm. It didnt feel realistic. He definitely felt out of place as Clark Kent, but hes not the Clark Kent that we grew up knowing
I don't get it. Is this poster saying Cavill is too handsome and charming for Clark? He/she expected dork reporter Clark not wandering Clark?
I think we really have two different audiences out there for summer blockbusters right now. The crowd that wants them to be big, bright and humorous (note I didn't say "dumb" so nobody should take that as an insult) and the crowd that wants them to be serious, introspective with a bit of weight behind them.
I think if anything MOS will come the closest this summer to appeasing both sides of the fence, but it's still inevitable that it's not going to be everyone's cup of tea.
They actually set up Superman as an amalgam of different pulp and literary heroes from the day ie. Doc Samson, John Carter, etc.
Not quite, at least as far as his creators were concerned. Superman (origin and all) was almost entirely modeled after Moses. His story is largely from the old testament (Moses), not the new testament (Jesus). Over time, other adaptations have made associations between Superman and Jesus, which is quite easy and often done with any messianic character. But as far as basis, Superman was always supposed to be more of an old testament-inspired character.
Yes. I want them to be both, because I think that's what COMIC BOOKS are. They're grandiose and big, but can also be smaller and more personal, with top notch action (depending on the artist) and have good supporting characters (depending on the writer)
Superman is much more of a Moses figure than he is a Christ one. I don't even see the Christ comparison.
Even Moses' nemesis, Pharoh, is bald, like Luthor. Superman and Moses are both put in "baskets" and sent away for their own safety, and in the new film Superman's birth is illegal (natural conception), much like Moses was (slaying of all the males).
Yeah, the person complained that he wasn't awkward enough as Clark
But he/she said he was a fantastic Superman
Sometimes I think that the biggest struggle the movie has, is the preconceptions of Superman coming fron the donnerverse. We all have opened our minds for a change, but some of this reactions are proof that the general audience is gonna need more time to adjust. Some reactions are really frustrating but what can we do.